Validity of a German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument based on the ESC Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines.

Sophie van den Houdt, Julian Colberg, Christina Samel, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Nina Kupper, Christian Albus
{"title":"Validity of a German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument based on the ESC Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines.","authors":"Sophie van den Houdt,&nbsp;Julian Colberg,&nbsp;Christina Samel,&nbsp;Christoph Herrmann-Lingen,&nbsp;Nina Kupper,&nbsp;Christian Albus","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2023.69.1.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Following guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the current study validated the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in participants who underwent coronary angiography. <b>Methods:</b> 314 participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 69.7 ± 12.0; 69 % male) completed the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated comparison scales to measure depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), work stress (ERI), family stress (SMSS), trauma (PC-PTSD), and anger and hostility (Z-scale of MMPI-2). <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the psychosocial risk factors were separate entities rather than a signs or symptoms of a single broad indication of distress (CFI = .872, RMSEA = .056, SRMR = .058). Intraclass coefficients (ICC), kappa and diagnostic accuracy indicators (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) indicated that most screener scales were sufficient to good. We also compared patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD; n = 213) to those with no current CHD (n = 100) and found overall similar results. <b>Discussion:</b> The German version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance. Aside from minor improvements, the screening instrument could be implemented in the cardiological practice to screen patients on multidimensional psychosocial risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"69 1","pages":"76-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2023.69.1.76","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC), the current study validated the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in participants who underwent coronary angiography. Methods: 314 participants (Mage = 69.7 ± 12.0; 69 % male) completed the German Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated comparison scales to measure depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), work stress (ERI), family stress (SMSS), trauma (PC-PTSD), and anger and hostility (Z-scale of MMPI-2). Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the psychosocial risk factors were separate entities rather than a signs or symptoms of a single broad indication of distress (CFI = .872, RMSEA = .056, SRMR = .058). Intraclass coefficients (ICC), kappa and diagnostic accuracy indicators (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) indicated that most screener scales were sufficient to good. We also compared patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD; n = 213) to those with no current CHD (n = 100) and found overall similar results. Discussion: The German version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance. Aside from minor improvements, the screening instrument could be implemented in the cardiological practice to screen patients on multidimensional psychosocial risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ESC心血管预防指南的德国综合社会心理筛查工具的有效性。
背景:根据欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的心血管疾病预防指南,目前的研究在接受冠状动脉造影的参与者中验证了德国综合社会心理筛查工具。方法:314例受试者(Mage = 69.7±12.0;69%男性)完成了德国综合社会心理筛查量表,并验证了抑郁(PHQ-9)、焦虑(GAD-7)、D型人格(DS14)、工作压力(ERI)、家庭压力(SMSS)、创伤(PC-PTSD)、愤怒和敌意(MMPI-2 z量表)的比较量表。结果:验证性因素分析(CFA)证实,心理社会风险因素是独立的实体,而不是单一的广义窘迫指征的体征或症状(CFI = 0.872, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.058)。类内系数(ICC)、kappa和诊断准确性指标(受试者操作者特征(ROC)曲线、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值[PPV];NPV])表明大多数筛选尺度都足够好。我们还比较了已确诊冠心病(CHD;n = 213)和目前没有冠心病的人(n = 100),发现总体结果相似。讨论:德国版的综合社会心理筛查工具有一个可以接受的表现。除了一些小的改进之外,筛查仪器可以在心脏病学实践中实施,以筛查患者的多维心理社会风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
期刊最新文献
Fragebogen zur Empirischen Untersuchung von Abwehrmechanismen (FEUA). Schweigen in der videobasierten Psychotherapie Eine Pilotstudie. Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Heftes. Editorial. Viele Wege führen zum Ziel – Therapieerfolg im Spiegel individueller Strukturen und systemischer Herausforderungen. Inhalt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1