Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters.

A K M Rezaul Karim, Sanchary Prativa, Lora T Likova
{"title":"Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters.","authors":"A K M Rezaul Karim,&nbsp;Sanchary Prativa,&nbsp;Lora T Likova","doi":"10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2022.5.000405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This exploratory study was designed to examine the effects of visual experience and specific texture parameters on both discriminative and aesthetic aspects of tactile perception. To this end, the authors conducted two experiments using a novel behavioral (ranking) approach in blind and (blindfolded) sighted individuals. Groups of congenitally blind, late blind, and (blindfolded) sighted participants made relative stimulus preference, aesthetic appreciation, and smoothness or softness judgment of two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) tactile surfaces through active touch. In both experiments, the aesthetic judgment was assessed on three affective dimensions, Relaxation, Hedonics, and Arousal, hypothesized to underlie visual aesthetics in a prior study. Results demonstrated that none of these behavioral judgments significantly varied as a function of visual experience in either experiment. However, irrespective of visual experience, significant differences were identified in all these behavioral judgments across the physical levels of smoothness or softness. In general, 2D smoothness or 3D softness discrimination was proportional to the level of physical smoothness or softness. Second, the smoother or softer tactile stimuli were preferred over the rougher or harder tactile stimuli. Third, the 3D affective structure of visual aesthetics appeared to be amodal and applicable to tactile aesthetics. However, analysis of the aesthetic profile across the affective dimensions revealed some striking differences between the forms of appreciation of smoothness and softness, uncovering unanticipated substructures in the nascent field of tactile aesthetics. While the physically softer 3D stimuli received higher ranks on all three affective dimensions, the physically smoother 2D stimuli received higher ranks on the Relaxation and Hedonics but lower ranks on the Arousal dimension. Moreover, the Relaxation and Hedonics ranks accurately overlapped with one another across all the physical levels of softness/hardness, but not across the physical levels of smoothness/roughness. These findings suggest that physical texture parameters not only affect basic tactile discrimination but differentially mediate tactile preferences, and aesthetic appreciation. The theoretical and practical implications of these novel findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perceptual imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019098/pdf/nihms-1789353.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perceptual imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2022.5.000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study was designed to examine the effects of visual experience and specific texture parameters on both discriminative and aesthetic aspects of tactile perception. To this end, the authors conducted two experiments using a novel behavioral (ranking) approach in blind and (blindfolded) sighted individuals. Groups of congenitally blind, late blind, and (blindfolded) sighted participants made relative stimulus preference, aesthetic appreciation, and smoothness or softness judgment of two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) tactile surfaces through active touch. In both experiments, the aesthetic judgment was assessed on three affective dimensions, Relaxation, Hedonics, and Arousal, hypothesized to underlie visual aesthetics in a prior study. Results demonstrated that none of these behavioral judgments significantly varied as a function of visual experience in either experiment. However, irrespective of visual experience, significant differences were identified in all these behavioral judgments across the physical levels of smoothness or softness. In general, 2D smoothness or 3D softness discrimination was proportional to the level of physical smoothness or softness. Second, the smoother or softer tactile stimuli were preferred over the rougher or harder tactile stimuli. Third, the 3D affective structure of visual aesthetics appeared to be amodal and applicable to tactile aesthetics. However, analysis of the aesthetic profile across the affective dimensions revealed some striking differences between the forms of appreciation of smoothness and softness, uncovering unanticipated substructures in the nascent field of tactile aesthetics. While the physically softer 3D stimuli received higher ranks on all three affective dimensions, the physically smoother 2D stimuli received higher ranks on the Relaxation and Hedonics but lower ranks on the Arousal dimension. Moreover, the Relaxation and Hedonics ranks accurately overlapped with one another across all the physical levels of softness/hardness, but not across the physical levels of smoothness/roughness. These findings suggest that physical texture parameters not only affect basic tactile discrimination but differentially mediate tactile preferences, and aesthetic appreciation. The theoretical and practical implications of these novel findings are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
触觉对象的感知与欣赏:视觉经验与纹理参数的作用。
本探索性研究旨在探讨视觉经验和特定纹理参数对触觉知觉的辨别和审美方面的影响。为此,作者在盲人和(蒙眼)视力正常的个体中进行了两个实验,使用了一种新的行为(排序)方法。先天失明组、晚期失明组和(蒙眼)视力正常组通过主动触摸对二维或三维触觉表面进行相对刺激偏好、审美欣赏和平滑或柔软判断。在这两个实验中,审美判断都是在三个情感维度上进行评估的,放松、享乐和觉醒,这是先前研究中假设的视觉美学基础。结果表明,在两个实验中,这些行为判断都没有明显的视觉经验变化。然而,不管视觉体验如何,所有这些行为判断在平滑或柔软的物理水平上都存在显著差异。一般来说,2D平滑度或3D柔软度的辨别与物理平滑度或柔软度成正比。其次,较光滑或较柔软的触觉刺激比粗糙或较硬的触觉刺激更受欢迎。第三,视觉美学的三维情感结构表现出模态性,适用于触觉美学。然而,在情感维度上对审美轮廓的分析揭示了对平滑和柔软的欣赏形式之间的一些显著差异,揭示了触觉美学新兴领域中意想不到的子结构。虽然物理上较柔软的3D刺激在所有三个情感维度上得分较高,但物理上较光滑的2D刺激在放松和快乐维度上得分较高,但在唤醒维度上得分较低。此外,放松和享乐的排名在柔软/硬度的所有物理级别上都精确地重叠,但在光滑/粗糙的物理级别上却没有重叠。这些结果表明,物理纹理参数不仅影响基本的触觉辨别,而且对触觉偏好和审美有差异的调节作用。讨论了这些新发现的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Adaptation Time in High Dynamic Range Luminance Transitions Efficient Coding in Human Vision as a Useful Bias in Computer Vision and Machine Learning Pictures: Crafting and Beholding Transparency and Translucency in Visual Appearance of Light-Permeable Materials Natural Scene Statistics and Distance Perception: Ground Surface and Non-ground Objects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1