Improved Maximal Workload and Systolic Blood Pressure After Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Thoracic Aortic Repair: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1097/HCR.0000000000000798
Niek Koenders, Henrita van Zetten, Michelle Smulders, Martin L Verra, Roland R J van Kimmenade, Thomas van Brakel, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Tim Smith
{"title":"Improved Maximal Workload and Systolic Blood Pressure After Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Thoracic Aortic Repair: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.","authors":"Niek Koenders,&nbsp;Henrita van Zetten,&nbsp;Michelle Smulders,&nbsp;Martin L Verra,&nbsp;Roland R J van Kimmenade,&nbsp;Thomas van Brakel,&nbsp;Thijs M H Eijsvogels,&nbsp;Tim Smith","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>It is of clinical importance to gain more knowledge about the risks and benefits of exercise in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. Therefore, the aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, and the incidence of adverse events during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of outcomes before versus after outpatient CR in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD42022301204) and published. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were systematically searched for eligible studies. Overall certainty of evidence was scored with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We included five studies with data from in total 241 patients. Data from one study could not be used in our meta-analysis because they were provided in a different unit of measure. Four studies with data of 146 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean maximal workload increased with 28.7 W (95% CI: 21.8-35.6 W, n = 146, low certainty of evidence). The mean systolic blood pressure during exercise testing increased with 25.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.6-34.3, n = 133, low certainty of evidence). No exercise-induced adverse events were reported. These outcomes indicate that CR seems beneficial and safe to improve exercise tolerance in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair, although outcomes were based on data from a small, heterogeneous group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: It is of clinical importance to gain more knowledge about the risks and benefits of exercise in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. Therefore, the aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, blood pressure, and the incidence of adverse events during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair.

Review methods: We performed a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of outcomes before versus after outpatient CR in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair. The study protocol was registered (PROSPERO CRD42022301204) and published. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were systematically searched for eligible studies. Overall certainty of evidence was scored with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

Summary: We included five studies with data from in total 241 patients. Data from one study could not be used in our meta-analysis because they were provided in a different unit of measure. Four studies with data of 146 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean maximal workload increased with 28.7 W (95% CI: 21.8-35.6 W, n = 146, low certainty of evidence). The mean systolic blood pressure during exercise testing increased with 25.4 mm Hg (95% CI: 16.6-34.3, n = 133, low certainty of evidence). No exercise-induced adverse events were reported. These outcomes indicate that CR seems beneficial and safe to improve exercise tolerance in patients recovering from thoracic aortic repair, although outcomes were based on data from a small, heterogeneous group of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸主动脉修复后心脏康复后最大工作负荷和收缩压的改善:系统综述和代谢分析。
目的:了解运动对胸主动脉修复术后患者的风险和益处具有临床意义。因此,本综述的目的是对胸主动脉修复后患者在心脏康复(CR)过程中心肺功能、血压和不良事件发生率的变化进行荟萃分析。综述方法:我们对胸主动脉修复后患者门诊CR前后的结果进行了系统综述和随机效应荟萃分析。研究方案已注册(PROSPERO CRD42022301204)并发表。MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL被系统地搜索合格的研究。证据的总体确定性通过建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)进行评分。总结:我们纳入了五项研究,共有241名患者的数据。一项研究的数据不能用于我们的荟萃分析,因为它们是以不同的计量单位提供的。荟萃分析中纳入了四项研究,数据涉及146名患者。平均最大工作量增加了28.7W(95%可信区间:21.8-35.6W,n=146,证据确定性低)。运动测试期间的平均收缩压增加了25.4毫米汞柱(95%置信区间:16.6-34.3,n=133,证据确定性低)。未报告运动诱发的不良事件。这些结果表明,CR对改善胸主动脉修复后患者的运动耐受性似乎是有益和安全的,尽管结果是基于一小群异质性患者的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Promising Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Gait and Balance in Patients With COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. History of Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An International Perspective. Remote Exercise Engagement Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. A Comparison of Rural and Urban Differences in Geographic Proximity to Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services in Tennessee. 2022 County-Level Population Changes in the United States Through the Lens of the Lifestyle Health Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1