Participant characteristics predicting communication outcomes in AAC implementation for individuals with ASD and IDD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Augmentative and Alternative Communication Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/07434618.2022.2116355

J B Ganz, James E Pustejovsky, Joe Reichle, Kimberly J Vannest, Margaret Foster, Lauren M Pierson, Sanikan Wattanawongwan, Armando J Bernal, Man Chen, April N Haas, Ching-Yi Liao, Mary Rose Sallese, Rachel Skov, S D Smith

{"title":"Participant characteristics predicting communication outcomes in AAC implementation for individuals with ASD and IDD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"J B Ganz, James E Pustejovsky, Joe Reichle, Kimberly J Vannest, Margaret Foster, Lauren M Pierson, Sanikan Wattanawongwan, Armando J Bernal, Man Chen, April N Haas, Ching-Yi Liao, Mary Rose Sallese, Rachel Skov, S D Smith","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2022.2116355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis examined communication outcomes in single-case design studies of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions and their relationship to participant characteristics. Variables addressed included chronological age, pre-intervention communication mode, productive repertoire, and pre-intervention imitation skills. Investigators identified 114 single-case design studies that implemented AAC interventions with school-aged individuals with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability. Two complementary effect size indices, Tau(AB) and the log response ratio, were applied to synthesize findings. Both indices showed positive effects on average, but also exhibited a high degree of heterogeneity. Moderator analyses detected few differences in effectiveness when comparing across diagnoses, age, the number and type of communication modes, participant's productive repertoires, and imitation skills to intervention. A PRISMA-compliant abstract is available: https://bit.ly/30BzbLv.</p>","PeriodicalId":49234,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","volume":"39 1","pages":"7-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2022.2116355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined communication outcomes in single-case design studies of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions and their relationship to participant characteristics. Variables addressed included chronological age, pre-intervention communication mode, productive repertoire, and pre-intervention imitation skills. Investigators identified 114 single-case design studies that implemented AAC interventions with school-aged individuals with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability. Two complementary effect size indices, Tau(AB) and the log response ratio, were applied to synthesize findings. Both indices showed positive effects on average, but also exhibited a high degree of heterogeneity. Moderator analyses detected few differences in effectiveness when comparing across diagnoses, age, the number and type of communication modes, participant's productive repertoires, and imitation skills to intervention. A PRISMA-compliant abstract is available: https://bit.ly/30BzbLv.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

预测ASD和IDD患者AAC实施中沟通结果的参与者特征:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

本荟萃分析考察了增强和替代沟通(AAC)干预的单例设计研究的沟通结果及其与参与者特征的关系。研究的变量包括实足年龄、干预前的沟通模式、生产曲目和干预前的模仿技能。研究人员确定了114项单例设计研究，这些研究对患有自闭症谱系障碍和/或智力残疾的学龄个体实施了AAC干预。采用互补效应大小指标Tau(AB)和对数响应比(log response ratio)对结果进行综合。两项指标的平均效应均为正，但也表现出高度的异质性。当比较不同的诊断、年龄、沟通模式的数量和类型、参与者的生产技能和模仿技巧时，调节分析发现，干预的有效性差异不大。一个prisma兼容的摘要是可用的:https://bit.ly/30BzbLv。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Augmentative and Alternative Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

15.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： As the official journal of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) publishes scientific articles related to the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) that report research concerning assessment, treatment, rehabilitation, and education of people who use or have the potential to use AAC systems; or that discuss theory, technology, and systems development relevant to AAC. The broad range of topic included in the Journal reflects the development of this field internationally. Manuscripts submitted to AAC should fall within one of the following categories, AND MUST COMPLY with associated page maximums listed on page 3 of the Manuscript Preparation Guide. Research articles (full peer review), These manuscripts report the results of original empirical research, including studies using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with both group and single-case experimental research designs (e.g, Binger et al., 2008; Petroi et al., 2014). Technical, research, and intervention notes (full peer review): These are brief manuscripts that address methodological, statistical, technical, or clinical issues or innovations that are of relevance to the AAC community and are designed to bring the research community’s attention to areas that have been minimally or poorly researched in the past (e.g., research note: Thunberg et al., 2016; intervention notes: Laubscher et al., 2019).