Ignacio D Velazquez, Kenneth K Woo, Mohammed Siddiqui, Sion K Roy
{"title":"Case Report: Culture-negative Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis.","authors":"Ignacio D Velazquez, Kenneth K Woo, Mohammed Siddiqui, Sion K Roy","doi":"10.2174/1573403X19666230411151214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prosthetic valve endocarditis can be difficult to diagnose and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially when no culture data are available to guide therapy. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms, the studies of choice for initial endocarditis evaluation, can be less reliable due to artifact and post-surgical changes. Some less common forms of endocarditis may be difficult to culture and, due to their fastidious nature, may delay the identification of causative organisms. Given the lack of directed antimicrobial treatment, culturenegative prosthetic valve endocarditis is specifically difficult. A wide differential diagnosis is critical to make a timely diagnosis and initiate treatment.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present a case of a patient presenting with dyspnea which was found to have culture-negative endocarditis requiring mitral and aortic valve replacement that ultimately was complicated with culture-negative prosthetic valve endocarditis. Identifying a culprit organism made appropriate and timely antimicrobial treatment difficult, ultimately resulting in the patient dying from endocarditis complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high index of suspicion is needed when managing infective endocarditis, especially when prosthetic valves are involved. Diagnostic accuracy of cultures and echocardiography may be reduced when dealing with prosthetic valve endocarditis; thus, alternative methods of diagnosis may be required to make a timely diagnosis of causative organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X19666230411151214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prosthetic valve endocarditis can be difficult to diagnose and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially when no culture data are available to guide therapy. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms, the studies of choice for initial endocarditis evaluation, can be less reliable due to artifact and post-surgical changes. Some less common forms of endocarditis may be difficult to culture and, due to their fastidious nature, may delay the identification of causative organisms. Given the lack of directed antimicrobial treatment, culturenegative prosthetic valve endocarditis is specifically difficult. A wide differential diagnosis is critical to make a timely diagnosis and initiate treatment.
Case presentation: We present a case of a patient presenting with dyspnea which was found to have culture-negative endocarditis requiring mitral and aortic valve replacement that ultimately was complicated with culture-negative prosthetic valve endocarditis. Identifying a culprit organism made appropriate and timely antimicrobial treatment difficult, ultimately resulting in the patient dying from endocarditis complications.
Conclusion: A high index of suspicion is needed when managing infective endocarditis, especially when prosthetic valves are involved. Diagnostic accuracy of cultures and echocardiography may be reduced when dealing with prosthetic valve endocarditis; thus, alternative methods of diagnosis may be required to make a timely diagnosis of causative organisms.
期刊介绍:
Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.