Endometrial receptivity evaluation using hysteroscopic endometrial gland image recognition.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Fertility Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-21 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2023.2191345
Shi Zheng, Zhu Minbo, Tong Chunya
{"title":"Endometrial receptivity evaluation using hysteroscopic endometrial gland image recognition.","authors":"Shi Zheng, Zhu Minbo, Tong Chunya","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2023.2191345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the endometrial gland count on hysteroscopic endometrial images in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) to evaluate endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcomes. Since endometrial receptivity and endometrial glands density are strongly influenced by numerous factors, we selected 98 patients who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in a natural cycle. Within 1-3 menstrual cycles before embryo transfer, hysteroscopic exploration was performed 3-7 days after ovulation. Uterine cavity morphological data were measured, and hysteroscopic endometrial imaging was performed. An endometrial gland opening labelling algorithm was used to recognize and count the endometrial glands. Patients were divided into pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups based on ET outcomes. No significant differences were noted in patients' general information and laboratory parameters, including age, years of infertility, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, endometrial thickness and embryos transferred between the two groups. The number of endometrial glands in the pregnancy group was higher than that in the non-pregnancy group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hysteroscopic examination of the uterine cavity and gland counting analysis of images using image recognition software can better indicate endometrial receptivity and improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":" ","pages":"1347-1353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2191345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the endometrial gland count on hysteroscopic endometrial images in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) to evaluate endometrial receptivity and predict pregnancy outcomes. Since endometrial receptivity and endometrial glands density are strongly influenced by numerous factors, we selected 98 patients who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in a natural cycle. Within 1-3 menstrual cycles before embryo transfer, hysteroscopic exploration was performed 3-7 days after ovulation. Uterine cavity morphological data were measured, and hysteroscopic endometrial imaging was performed. An endometrial gland opening labelling algorithm was used to recognize and count the endometrial glands. Patients were divided into pregnancy and non-pregnancy groups based on ET outcomes. No significant differences were noted in patients' general information and laboratory parameters, including age, years of infertility, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, endometrial thickness and embryos transferred between the two groups. The number of endometrial glands in the pregnancy group was higher than that in the non-pregnancy group (p < 0.05). Hysteroscopic examination of the uterine cavity and gland counting analysis of images using image recognition software can better indicate endometrial receptivity and improve pregnancy outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用宫腔镜子宫内膜腺体图像识别评估子宫内膜受孕率。
我们研究了接受体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)的患者在宫腔镜下子宫内膜图像上的子宫内膜腺体数量,以评估子宫内膜的接受能力并预测妊娠结局。由于子宫内膜容受性和子宫内膜腺体密度受多种因素的强烈影响,我们选择了98名在自然周期中接受冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)的患者。在胚胎移植前的 1-3 个月经周期内,于排卵后 3-7 天进行宫腔镜检查。测量宫腔形态数据,并进行宫腔镜子宫内膜成像。采用子宫内膜腺体开口标记算法来识别和计数子宫内膜腺体。根据 ET 结果将患者分为妊娠组和非妊娠组。两组患者的一般信息和实验室指标(包括年龄、不孕年数、体重指数、抗穆勒氏激素、子宫内膜厚度和胚胎移植)无明显差异。妊娠组的子宫内膜腺体数量高于非妊娠组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
期刊最新文献
Do very young oocyte donors negatively impact live birth rates in their recipients? The infected blood inquiry report-lessons for gamete donation. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes. Mpox in assisted conception: should we be worried about this monkey wrench? Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): British Fertility Society policy and practice guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1