Perspective of educational environment on students' perception of teaching and learning.

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1007/s10984-022-09428-8
Falguni Singh, Monika Saini, Ashish Kumar, Seeram Ramakrishna, Mousumi Debnath
{"title":"Perspective of educational environment on students' perception of teaching and learning.","authors":"Falguni Singh,&nbsp;Monika Saini,&nbsp;Ashish Kumar,&nbsp;Seeram Ramakrishna,&nbsp;Mousumi Debnath","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09428-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional research was designed using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) to examine the impact of the educational environment on students' perceptions of learning and teaching in a university offering higher education. Using a Likert scale, 300 participants from various streams were assessed. There were no disparities in the students' judgments in the five DREEM categories of discipline, accommodation, gender, level of study, and disciplines. In general, students judged that the student-teaching environment was satisfactory. To investigate the validity of the DREEM, we conducted Cronbach alpha analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) employing principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Only 44 of the 50 factors were deemed to be significant, with a cumulative explained variance of 46.539%. The total construct dependability of the EFA nine-factor solutions was 0.954. Finally, only five acceptable factors explained 46.539% variance using the criteria of eigenvalue > 1 and Cronbach's alpha > 0.6. Factor analysis was appropriate as evidenced by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy of 0.942. With a Cronbach alpha of 0.955, the revised first domain of \"student perception of learning\" was the most trustworthy DREEM item, accounting for 20.19% of the variance. The highest factor loading was for the item \"Teaching helps me become a more active learner\". A redesigned DREEM might be valuable for assessing the educational environment at institutions providing higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"337-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9629770/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09428-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cross-sectional research was designed using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) to examine the impact of the educational environment on students' perceptions of learning and teaching in a university offering higher education. Using a Likert scale, 300 participants from various streams were assessed. There were no disparities in the students' judgments in the five DREEM categories of discipline, accommodation, gender, level of study, and disciplines. In general, students judged that the student-teaching environment was satisfactory. To investigate the validity of the DREEM, we conducted Cronbach alpha analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) employing principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Only 44 of the 50 factors were deemed to be significant, with a cumulative explained variance of 46.539%. The total construct dependability of the EFA nine-factor solutions was 0.954. Finally, only five acceptable factors explained 46.539% variance using the criteria of eigenvalue > 1 and Cronbach's alpha > 0.6. Factor analysis was appropriate as evidenced by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy of 0.942. With a Cronbach alpha of 0.955, the revised first domain of "student perception of learning" was the most trustworthy DREEM item, accounting for 20.19% of the variance. The highest factor loading was for the item "Teaching helps me become a more active learner". A redesigned DREEM might be valuable for assessing the educational environment at institutions providing higher education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育环境对学生教学感知的影响。
使用Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure(DREM)设计了一项横断面研究,以考察教育环境对提供高等教育的大学学生学习和教学观念的影响。使用Likert量表,对来自不同流的300名参与者进行了评估。学生对DREEM学科、住宿、性别、学习水平和学科的五个类别的判断没有差异。总的来说,学生们认为学生的教学环境令人满意。为了研究DREM的有效性,我们采用方差最大旋转的主成分分析进行了Cronbachα分析和探索性因素分析(EFA)。50个因素中只有44个被认为是显著的,累积解释方差为46.539%。EFA九个因素解决方案的总结构可靠性为0.954。最后,使用特征值标准,只有五个可接受的因素解释了46.539%的方差 > 1和克朗巴赫α > 0.6。因子分析是适当的,如0.942的Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin采样充分性度量所证明的。Cronbachα为0.955,修正后的“学生学习感知”第一领域是最值得信赖的DREM项目,占方差的20.19%。因子负荷最高的是“教学帮助我成为一个更积极的学习者”这一项目。重新设计的DREM可能有助于评估提供高等教育的机构的教育环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Learning Environments Research publishes original academic papers dealing with the study of learning environments, including theoretical reflections, reports of quantitative and qualitative research, critical and integrative literature reviews and meta-analyses, discussion of methodological issues, reports of the development and validation of assessment instruments, and reviews of books and evaluation instruments.  The scope of the journal deliberately is very broad in terms of both substance and methods. `Learning environment'' refers to the social, physical, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs and which affect student achievement and attitudes. The aim of the journal is to increase our understanding of pre-primary, primary, high school, college and university, and lifelong learning environments irrespective of subject area. Apart from classroom-level and school-level environments, special attention is given to the many out-of-school learning environments such as the home, science centres, and television, etc. The influence of the rapidly developing field of Information Technology with its whole new range of learning environments is an important aspect of the scope of the journal. A wide range of qualitative and quantitative methods for studying learning enviromnents, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, are strongly encouraged. The journal has an affiliation with the American Educational Research Association''s Special Interest Group on the Study of Learning Environments. However, having Regional Editors and an Editorial Board from around the world ensures that LER is a truly international journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of university online teaching and learning delivery approaches and students’ performance during COVID-19 Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) Pedagogical strategies employed in the Emergency Remote Learning Environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The tale of teachers and school ICT coordinators Promoting adolescent subjective well-being: a classroom environment approach Value vs. vulnerability: exploring asynchronous commenting in lecture-capture video recordings for undergraduate medical and dental students and its impact on learning through a pre and post survey design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1