Discourse abilities in euthymic elderly patients with bipolar disorder: a preliminary study.

Maria Gabriela Valeriano, Renné Alegria, Orestes Vicente Forlenza, Marcia Radanovic
{"title":"Discourse abilities in euthymic elderly patients with bipolar disorder: a preliminary study.","authors":"Maria Gabriela Valeriano,&nbsp;Renné Alegria,&nbsp;Orestes Vicente Forlenza,&nbsp;Marcia Radanovic","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment has been well described in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD), as well as in elderly patients. Language disturbances are less studied, and several inconsistencies are reported in the literature. Most language studies focus on verbal fluency and semantic alterations, with a lack of studies addressing discursive abilities in BD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate discourse abilities in euthymic elderly individuals with BD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 19 euthymic elderly patients with BD and a control group of non-BD, which performed a cognitive assessment of attention, memory, executive functions, and visual abilities. All participants produced a description from the Cookie Theft Picture in oral and written modalities that was analyzed according to micro- and macrolinguistic aspects. Generalized linear models were performed to compare intergroup linguistic performance and to determine whether any cognitive domain was associated with linguistic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BD group produced more cohesion errors in the oral and written modalities (p=0.016 and p=0.011, respectively) and fewer thematic units in the oral modality (p=0.027) than the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BD patients presented minimal changes in the descriptive discourse task. The BD group produced more cohesion errors than the control group in the oral (p=0.016) and written discourse (p=0.011); also, the BD group produced fewer thematic units than controls in the oral discourse (p=0.027).</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment has been well described in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (BD), as well as in elderly patients. Language disturbances are less studied, and several inconsistencies are reported in the literature. Most language studies focus on verbal fluency and semantic alterations, with a lack of studies addressing discursive abilities in BD.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate discourse abilities in euthymic elderly individuals with BD.

Methods: We studied 19 euthymic elderly patients with BD and a control group of non-BD, which performed a cognitive assessment of attention, memory, executive functions, and visual abilities. All participants produced a description from the Cookie Theft Picture in oral and written modalities that was analyzed according to micro- and macrolinguistic aspects. Generalized linear models were performed to compare intergroup linguistic performance and to determine whether any cognitive domain was associated with linguistic outcomes.

Results: The BD group produced more cohesion errors in the oral and written modalities (p=0.016 and p=0.011, respectively) and fewer thematic units in the oral modality (p=0.027) than the control group.

Conclusions: BD patients presented minimal changes in the descriptive discourse task. The BD group produced more cohesion errors than the control group in the oral (p=0.016) and written discourse (p=0.011); also, the BD group produced fewer thematic units than controls in the oral discourse (p=0.027).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年健郁双相障碍患者话语能力的初步研究。
认知障碍在双相情感障碍(BD)患者和老年患者中都有很好的描述。语言障碍的研究较少,文献中有一些不一致的报道。大多数的语言研究都集中在语言流畅性和语义改变上,缺乏对老年双相障碍患者话语能力的研究。目的:本研究的目的是评估老年双相障碍患者的话语能力。方法:我们研究了19例老年双相障碍患者和对照组的非双相障碍患者,对他们的注意力、记忆、执行功能和视觉能力进行了认知评估。所有参与者都以口头和书面的方式对Cookie盗窃图片进行描述,并根据微观和宏观语言方面进行分析。采用广义线性模型来比较群体间的语言表现,并确定是否有任何认知领域与语言结果相关。结果:与对照组相比,BD组在口语和书面语中出现了更多的衔接错误(p=0.016和p=0.011),在口语中出现了更少的主位单元(p=0.027)。结论:双相障碍患者在描述性话语任务中表现出微小的变化。BD组在口语(p=0.016)和书面语篇(p=0.011)中产生的衔接错误多于对照组;此外,BD组在口头话语中产生的主题单位比对照组少(p=0.027)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
期刊最新文献
Brain morphometry in transient global amnesia: a triangulated analysis approach. Executive functions, mental health, and quality of life in healthy older adults. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in clinical practice in Brazil: recommendations from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Use of anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease in Brazil: a position paper from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Caring for people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic:a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1