Physical learning environments' supportiveness to innovative pedagogies: students' and teachers' experiences.

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-08 DOI:10.1007/s10984-022-09433-x
S Baars, G L M Schellings, J P Joore, P J V van Wesemael
{"title":"Physical learning environments' supportiveness to innovative pedagogies: students' and teachers' experiences.","authors":"S Baars,&nbsp;G L M Schellings,&nbsp;J P Joore,&nbsp;P J V van Wesemael","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09433-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research into the relationship between innovative physical learning environments (PLEs) and innovative psychosocial learning environments (PSLEs) indicates that it must be understood as a network of relationships between multiple psychosocial and physical aspects. Actors shape this network by attaching meanings to these aspects and their relationships in a continuous process of gaining and exchanging experiences. This study used a psychosocial-physical, relational approach for exploring teachers' and students' experiences with six innovative PLEs in a higher educational institute, with the application of a psychosocial-physical relationship (PPR) framework. This framework, which brings together the multitude of PLE and PSLE aspects, was used to map and analyse teachers' and students' experiences that were gathered in focus group interviews. The PPR framework proved useful in analysing the results and comparing them with previous research. Previously-identified relationships were confirmed, clarified, and nuanced. The results underline the importance of the attunement of system aspects to pedagogical and spatial changes, and of a psychosocial-physical relational approach in designing and implementing new learning environments, including the involvement of actors in the discourse within and between the different system levels. Interventions can be less invasive, resistance to processes could be reduced, and innovative PLEs could be used more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"617-659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9643926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09433-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research into the relationship between innovative physical learning environments (PLEs) and innovative psychosocial learning environments (PSLEs) indicates that it must be understood as a network of relationships between multiple psychosocial and physical aspects. Actors shape this network by attaching meanings to these aspects and their relationships in a continuous process of gaining and exchanging experiences. This study used a psychosocial-physical, relational approach for exploring teachers' and students' experiences with six innovative PLEs in a higher educational institute, with the application of a psychosocial-physical relationship (PPR) framework. This framework, which brings together the multitude of PLE and PSLE aspects, was used to map and analyse teachers' and students' experiences that were gathered in focus group interviews. The PPR framework proved useful in analysing the results and comparing them with previous research. Previously-identified relationships were confirmed, clarified, and nuanced. The results underline the importance of the attunement of system aspects to pedagogical and spatial changes, and of a psychosocial-physical relational approach in designing and implementing new learning environments, including the involvement of actors in the discourse within and between the different system levels. Interventions can be less invasive, resistance to processes could be reduced, and innovative PLEs could be used more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理学习环境对创新教学法的支持:学生和教师的经验。
对创新物理学习环境(PLEs)和创新心理社会学习环境(PSLE)之间关系的研究表明,必须将其理解为多个心理社会和物理方面之间的关系网络。行动者通过在不断获得和交流经验的过程中赋予这些方面及其关系以意义来塑造这个网络。本研究采用社会心理-身体关系的方法,探讨了教师和学生在高等教育机构中使用六种创新PLE的经历,并应用了社会心理-生理关系(PPR)框架。该框架汇集了PLE和PSLE的众多方面,用于绘制和分析在焦点小组访谈中收集的教师和学生的经验。PPR框架在分析结果并将其与以前的研究进行比较方面证明是有用的。先前确定的关系得到了证实、澄清和细致入微。研究结果强调了系统方面与教学和空间变化相协调的重要性,以及在设计和实施新的学习环境时采用心理-物理-关系方法的重要性,包括参与者参与不同系统层面内部和之间的话语。干预可以减少侵入性,减少对过程的阻力,并且可以更有效地使用创新的PLE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Learning Environments Research publishes original academic papers dealing with the study of learning environments, including theoretical reflections, reports of quantitative and qualitative research, critical and integrative literature reviews and meta-analyses, discussion of methodological issues, reports of the development and validation of assessment instruments, and reviews of books and evaluation instruments.  The scope of the journal deliberately is very broad in terms of both substance and methods. `Learning environment'' refers to the social, physical, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs and which affect student achievement and attitudes. The aim of the journal is to increase our understanding of pre-primary, primary, high school, college and university, and lifelong learning environments irrespective of subject area. Apart from classroom-level and school-level environments, special attention is given to the many out-of-school learning environments such as the home, science centres, and television, etc. The influence of the rapidly developing field of Information Technology with its whole new range of learning environments is an important aspect of the scope of the journal. A wide range of qualitative and quantitative methods for studying learning enviromnents, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, are strongly encouraged. The journal has an affiliation with the American Educational Research Association''s Special Interest Group on the Study of Learning Environments. However, having Regional Editors and an Editorial Board from around the world ensures that LER is a truly international journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of university online teaching and learning delivery approaches and students’ performance during COVID-19 Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) Pedagogical strategies employed in the Emergency Remote Learning Environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The tale of teachers and school ICT coordinators Promoting adolescent subjective well-being: a classroom environment approach Value vs. vulnerability: exploring asynchronous commenting in lecture-capture video recordings for undergraduate medical and dental students and its impact on learning through a pre and post survey design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1