A three-timepoint network analysis of Covid-19's impact on schizotypal traits, paranoia and mental health through loneliness.

Keri Ka-Yee Wong, Yi Wang, Gianluca Esposito, Adrian Raine
{"title":"A three-timepoint network analysis of Covid-19's impact on schizotypal traits, paranoia and mental health through loneliness.","authors":"Keri Ka-Yee Wong,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Gianluca Esposito,&nbsp;Adrian Raine","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2019 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic has impacted people's mental wellbeing. Studies to date have examined the prevalence of mental health symptoms (anxiety and depression), yet fewer longitudinal studies have compared across background factors and other psychological variables to identify vulnerable subgroups in the general population. This study tests to what extent higher levels of schizotypal traits and paranoia are associated with mental health variables 6- and 12-months since April 2020. Over 2300 adult volunteers (18-89 years, female = 74.9%) with access to the study link online were recruited from the UK, the USA, Greece and Italy. Self-reported levels of schizotypy, paranoia, anxiety, depression, aggression, loneliness and stress from three timepoints (17 April to 13 July 2020, <i>N<sub>1</sub></i> = 1599; 17 October to 31 January 2021, <i>N<sub>2</sub></i> = 774; and 17 April to 31 July 2021, <i>N<sub>3</sub></i> = 586) were mapped using network analysis and compared across time and background variables (sex, age, income, country). Schizotypal traits and paranoia were positively associated with poorer mental health through loneliness, with no effect of age, sex, income levels, countries and timepoints. Loneliness was the most influential variable across all networks, despite overall reductions in levels of loneliness, schizotypy, paranoia and aggression during the easing of lockdown (time 3). Individuals with higher levels of schizotypal traits/paranoia reported poorer mental health outcomes than individuals in the low-trait groups. Schizotypal traits and paranoia are associated with poor mental health outcomes through self-perceived feelings of loneliness, suggesting that increasing social/community cohesion may improve individuals' mental wellbeing in the long run.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"4 ","pages":"e044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2019 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic has impacted people's mental wellbeing. Studies to date have examined the prevalence of mental health symptoms (anxiety and depression), yet fewer longitudinal studies have compared across background factors and other psychological variables to identify vulnerable subgroups in the general population. This study tests to what extent higher levels of schizotypal traits and paranoia are associated with mental health variables 6- and 12-months since April 2020. Over 2300 adult volunteers (18-89 years, female = 74.9%) with access to the study link online were recruited from the UK, the USA, Greece and Italy. Self-reported levels of schizotypy, paranoia, anxiety, depression, aggression, loneliness and stress from three timepoints (17 April to 13 July 2020, N1 = 1599; 17 October to 31 January 2021, N2 = 774; and 17 April to 31 July 2021, N3 = 586) were mapped using network analysis and compared across time and background variables (sex, age, income, country). Schizotypal traits and paranoia were positively associated with poorer mental health through loneliness, with no effect of age, sex, income levels, countries and timepoints. Loneliness was the most influential variable across all networks, despite overall reductions in levels of loneliness, schizotypy, paranoia and aggression during the easing of lockdown (time 3). Individuals with higher levels of schizotypal traits/paranoia reported poorer mental health outcomes than individuals in the low-trait groups. Schizotypal traits and paranoia are associated with poor mental health outcomes through self-perceived feelings of loneliness, suggesting that increasing social/community cohesion may improve individuals' mental wellbeing in the long run.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎对精神分裂型特征、偏执和孤独感心理健康影响的三时间点网络分析
2019年冠状病毒(Covid-19)大流行影响了人们的心理健康。迄今为止的研究已经调查了心理健康症状(焦虑和抑郁)的患病率,但很少有纵向研究比较背景因素和其他心理变量,以确定一般人群中的弱势亚群体。这项研究测试了自2020年4月以来的6个月和12个月里,较高水平的分裂型特征和偏执与心理健康变量的关联程度。从英国、美国、希腊和意大利招募了2300多名成年志愿者(18-89岁,女性= 74.9%),他们可以在线访问研究链接。三个时间点精神分裂、偏执、焦虑、抑郁、攻击、孤独和压力的自我报告水平(2020年4月17日至7月13日,N1 = 1599;2021年10月17日至1月31日,N2 = 774;和2021年4月17日至7月31日,N3 = 586),使用网络分析绘制地图,并跨时间和背景变量(性别、年龄、收入、国家)进行比较。精神分裂型特征和偏执与孤独感导致的心理健康状况较差呈正相关,而年龄、性别、收入水平、国家和时间点没有影响。在所有网络中,孤独是最具影响力的变量,尽管在放松封锁期间(时间3),孤独、分裂型、偏执和攻击的水平总体上有所下降。分裂型特征/偏执水平较高的个体报告的心理健康结果比低特征组的个体差。精神分裂型特征和偏执狂通过自我感知的孤独感与心理健康状况不佳有关,这表明从长远来看,增加社会/社区凝聚力可能会改善个人的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Procedural justice and (in)equitable participation in climate negotiations. Miniaturisation of the Daphnia magna immobilisation assay for the reliable testing of low volume samples. A virtual global carbon price is essential to drive rapid decarbonisation. Urinary arsenic species and birth outcomes in Tacna, Peru, 2019: a prospective cohort study. Hydrophobic treatments and their application with internal wall insulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1