Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Bio-C Repair, Endosequence BC Root Repair, MTA Angelus and MTA Repair HP.

Q2 Medicine Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202305047
Suene Moçato Siguematsu Abrão, Danielle Gregorio, Monalisa Kethleen Costa De Azevedo, Graziela Garrido Mori, Regina Célia Poli-Frederico, Luciana Prado Maia
{"title":"Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Bio-C Repair, Endosequence BC Root Repair, MTA Angelus and MTA Repair HP.","authors":"Suene Moçato Siguematsu Abrão,&nbsp;Danielle Gregorio,&nbsp;Monalisa Kethleen Costa De Azevedo,&nbsp;Graziela Garrido Mori,&nbsp;Regina Célia Poli-Frederico,&nbsp;Luciana Prado Maia","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Bio-C Repair (BCR), compared to Endosequence BC Root Repair (ERRM), MTA Angelus (MTA-Ang), and MTA Repair HP (MTA-HP). MC3T3 osteoblastic cells were exposed to extracts of the repairing bioceramic cements. After 1, 3, and 7 days, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were evaluated by MTT and Micronucleus tests, respectively. Cells not exposed to biomaterials were used as a negative control. Data were compared using ANOVA two-way, followed by the Tukey Test (α=5%). MTA-Ang and MTA-HP showed no difference in relation to control regarding cytotoxicity in any experimental times. BCR and ERRM reduced cell viability after 3 and 7 days (p<0.05); however, the reduction caused by BCR was less than that caused by ERRM. Considering the micronucleus formation, all biomaterials caused an increase after 3 and 7 days (p<0.05), being greater for the BCR and ERRM groups. It can be concluded that BCR is non-cytotoxic in osteoblastic cells, as well as MTA-Ang e MTA Repair HP. BCR and ERRM showed greater genotoxicity than others tested biomaterials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 2","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Bio-C Repair (BCR), compared to Endosequence BC Root Repair (ERRM), MTA Angelus (MTA-Ang), and MTA Repair HP (MTA-HP). MC3T3 osteoblastic cells were exposed to extracts of the repairing bioceramic cements. After 1, 3, and 7 days, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were evaluated by MTT and Micronucleus tests, respectively. Cells not exposed to biomaterials were used as a negative control. Data were compared using ANOVA two-way, followed by the Tukey Test (α=5%). MTA-Ang and MTA-HP showed no difference in relation to control regarding cytotoxicity in any experimental times. BCR and ERRM reduced cell viability after 3 and 7 days (p<0.05); however, the reduction caused by BCR was less than that caused by ERRM. Considering the micronucleus formation, all biomaterials caused an increase after 3 and 7 days (p<0.05), being greater for the BCR and ERRM groups. It can be concluded that BCR is non-cytotoxic in osteoblastic cells, as well as MTA-Ang e MTA Repair HP. BCR and ERRM showed greater genotoxicity than others tested biomaterials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bio-C修复、Endosequence BC根修复、MTA Angelus和MTA Repair HP的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。
目的是评估Bio-C Repair (BCR)的体外细胞毒性和遗传毒性,并与Endosequence BC Root Repair (ERRM)、MTA Angelus (MTA- ang)和MTA Repair HP (MTA-HP)进行比较。将MC3T3成骨细胞暴露于修复生物陶瓷水泥提取物中。1、3、7 d后,分别用MTT和微核试验评价细胞毒性和遗传毒性。未暴露于生物材料的细胞作为阴性对照。数据比较采用双因素方差分析,随后采用Tukey检验(α=5%)。在任何实验时间,MTA-Ang和MTA-HP在细胞毒性方面与对照组没有差异。BCR和ERRM在3天和7天后降低了细胞活力(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Can a dentin bonding agent prevent color change in regenerative endodontic procedures? An in vitro evaluation Antibacterial ability of different activated irrigation after root canal preparation: intratubular analyses Inhibition of incipient caries lesion progression by different fluoridated varnishes A new hydroxyapatite-alginate-gelatin biocomposite favor bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect model Prevalence of lectures about dental esthetics and female speakers in three Brazilian conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1