An Educational Intervention to Enhance the Performance of Peer Feedback.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001290
Amanda Haverhals
{"title":"An Educational Intervention to Enhance the Performance of Peer Feedback.","authors":"Amanda Haverhals","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Offering peer feedback on a routine basis may improve nursing, patient, and organizational outcomes by addressing potentially problematic issues before they occur.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited literature of specific feedback processes, although national agencies support peer feedback as a professional responsibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational tool was used to train nurses on defining what constitutes professional peer review, reviewing ethical and professional standards, and evaluating the types of peer feedback supported by the literature along with suggestions to use when giving and receiving peer feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Beliefs about Peer Feedback Questionnaire was used to evaluate the nurses' perceived value and confidence when giving and receiving peer feedback before and after the implementation of the educational tool. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated overall improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When peer feedback educational tools were available to nurses and the environment supports professional peer review, there was a significant improvement in the level of comfort when giving and receiving peer feedback, along with increased perceived value of peer feedback given and received.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Offering peer feedback on a routine basis may improve nursing, patient, and organizational outcomes by addressing potentially problematic issues before they occur.

Background: There is limited literature of specific feedback processes, although national agencies support peer feedback as a professional responsibility.

Methods: An educational tool was used to train nurses on defining what constitutes professional peer review, reviewing ethical and professional standards, and evaluating the types of peer feedback supported by the literature along with suggestions to use when giving and receiving peer feedback.

Results: The Beliefs about Peer Feedback Questionnaire was used to evaluate the nurses' perceived value and confidence when giving and receiving peer feedback before and after the implementation of the educational tool. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated overall improvement.

Conclusions: When peer feedback educational tools were available to nurses and the environment supports professional peer review, there was a significant improvement in the level of comfort when giving and receiving peer feedback, along with increased perceived value of peer feedback given and received.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高同伴反馈表现的教育干预。
目的:在日常基础上提供同伴反馈可以通过在潜在问题发生之前解决这些问题来改善护理、患者和组织的结果。背景:关于具体反馈过程的文献有限,尽管国家机构支持将同行反馈作为一种专业责任。方法:使用教育工具培训护士定义什么是专业同行评审,审查道德和专业标准,评估文献支持的同行反馈类型,以及在给予和接受同行反馈时使用的建议。结果:采用同伴反馈信念问卷对实施该教育工具前后护士在给予和接受同伴反馈时的感知价值和信心进行了评估。非参数Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示总体改善。结论:当护士可以使用同伴反馈教育工具,并且环境支持专业的同伴评估时,给予和接受同伴反馈时的舒适度显著提高,同时给予和接受的同伴反馈的感知价值也有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
National Incidence of Nurse Suicide and Associated Features. Exploring Reasons for Satisfaction with Job Assignments Among Travel Nurses. Institution-Wide Moral Distress Among Nurses. Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1