Eye Care in Young Children: A Parents' Perspective of Access and Barriers.

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13186
Ali M Alsaqr
{"title":"Eye Care in Young Children: A Parents' Perspective of Access and Barriers.","authors":"Ali M Alsaqr","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate parental perspectives of accessing eye care for children aged under seven years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted during September 2020 to March 2021 using online applications and distributed to parents whose children were between the ages of three and seven years. The survey included parents' background, their knowledge of the provision of eye-care services, and the possible barriers that existed to access eye-care services. The relationship between parents' knowledge, barrier scores, level of parental education, and demographic or socioeconomic status was assessed using nonparametric tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1037 questionnaires were completed. The respondents were from 50 cities across Saudi regions. The participants' age was 39 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 7.5 years, and 54% of them had at least one child under the age of seven (<i>n</i> = 564). Further, 47% had not taken their children for vision screening at reception/year one (<i>n</i> = 467). In addition, 65% of them were not aware of the mandatory screening program at reception/year <i>1</i>; whereas, only 20% (<i>n</i> = 207) knew how to access eye-care services; and only 39% of the children had undergone any kind of eye or vision test. The pathways to eye care and the cost of eye services/glasses were the main limitations. The parents' responses were significantly influenced by their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (Kruskal Wallis, <i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a need for enhancing parent information on how to access eye care for young children and the currently available vision screening programs. Finally, a national protocol to cover the cost of the eye exam as well as spectacle prescription shall be proposed as a mean of incentive.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"192-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate parental perspectives of accessing eye care for children aged under seven years.

Methods: The survey was conducted during September 2020 to March 2021 using online applications and distributed to parents whose children were between the ages of three and seven years. The survey included parents' background, their knowledge of the provision of eye-care services, and the possible barriers that existed to access eye-care services. The relationship between parents' knowledge, barrier scores, level of parental education, and demographic or socioeconomic status was assessed using nonparametric tests.

Results: In total, 1037 questionnaires were completed. The respondents were from 50 cities across Saudi regions. The participants' age was 39 ± 7.5 years, and 54% of them had at least one child under the age of seven (n = 564). Further, 47% had not taken their children for vision screening at reception/year one (n = 467). In addition, 65% of them were not aware of the mandatory screening program at reception/year 1; whereas, only 20% (n = 207) knew how to access eye-care services; and only 39% of the children had undergone any kind of eye or vision test. The pathways to eye care and the cost of eye services/glasses were the main limitations. The parents' responses were significantly influenced by their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (Kruskal Wallis, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: There was a need for enhancing parent information on how to access eye care for young children and the currently available vision screening programs. Finally, a national protocol to cover the cost of the eye exam as well as spectacle prescription shall be proposed as a mean of incentive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿眼保健:家长视角下的可及性与障碍
目的:评价7岁以下儿童获得眼保健的家长观点。方法:调查于2020年9月至2021年3月通过在线申请进行,并分发给子女年龄在3至7岁之间的父母。调查内容包括家长的背景、他们对提供眼科护理服务的了解程度,以及可能存在的妨碍获得眼科护理服务的障碍。使用非参数检验评估父母知识、障碍分数、父母教育水平与人口或社会经济地位之间的关系。结果:共完成问卷1037份。受访者来自沙特地区的50个城市。参与者年龄为39±7.5岁,54%的参与者至少有一个7岁以下的孩子(n = 564)。此外,47%的人在接待时没有带孩子进行视力筛查(n = 467)。此外,65%的人不知道在接待/第一年的强制性筛查程序;然而,只有20% (n = 207)知道如何获得眼科护理服务;只有39%的孩子接受了任何类型的眼睛或视力测试。获得眼科保健的途径和眼科服务/眼镜的费用是主要的限制。父母的人口学特征和社会经济特征显著影响父母的回答(Kruskal Wallis, P 0.05)。结论:有必要加强对如何获得幼儿眼睛保健和现有视力筛查方案的家长信息。最后,应提出一项国家协议,以支付眼科检查和眼镜处方的费用,作为一种激励手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1