Clinical evaluation of a deep learning segmentation model including manual adjustments afterwards for locally advanced breast cancer

Nienke Bakx , Dorien Rijkaart , Maurice van der Sangen , Jacqueline Theuws , Peter-Paul van der Toorn , An-Sofie Verrijssen , Jorien van der Leer , Joline Mutsaers , Thérèse van Nunen , Marjon Reinders , Inge Schuengel , Julia Smits , Els Hagelaar , Dave van Gruijthuijsen , Johanna Bluemink , Coen Hurkmans
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a deep learning segmentation model including manual adjustments afterwards for locally advanced breast cancer","authors":"Nienke Bakx ,&nbsp;Dorien Rijkaart ,&nbsp;Maurice van der Sangen ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Theuws ,&nbsp;Peter-Paul van der Toorn ,&nbsp;An-Sofie Verrijssen ,&nbsp;Jorien van der Leer ,&nbsp;Joline Mutsaers ,&nbsp;Thérèse van Nunen ,&nbsp;Marjon Reinders ,&nbsp;Inge Schuengel ,&nbsp;Julia Smits ,&nbsp;Els Hagelaar ,&nbsp;Dave van Gruijthuijsen ,&nbsp;Johanna Bluemink ,&nbsp;Coen Hurkmans","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly developed for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy. Qualitative analysis is of great importance for clinical implementation, next to quantitative. This study evaluates a DL segmentation model for left- and right-sided locally advanced breast cancer both quantitatively and qualitatively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For each side a DL model was trained, including primary breast CTV (CTVp), lymph node levels 1–4, heart, lungs, humeral head, thyroid and esophagus. For evaluation, both automatic segmentation, including correction of contours when needed, and manual delineation was performed and both processes were timed. Quantitative scoring with dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (95%HD) and surface DSC (sDSC) was used to compare both the automatic (not-corrected) and corrected contours with the manual contours. Qualitative scoring was performed by five radiotherapy technologists and five radiation oncologists using a 3-point Likert scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Time reduction was achieved using auto-segmentation in 95% of the cases, including correction. The time reduction (mean ± std) was 42.4% ± 26.5% and 58.5% ± 19.1% for OARs and CTVs, respectively, corresponding to an absolute mean reduction (hh:mm:ss) of 00:08:51 and 00:25:38. Good quantitative results were achieved before correction, e.g. mean DSC for the right-sided CTVp was 0.92 ± 0.06, whereas correction statistically significantly improved this contour by only 0.02 ± 0.05, respectively. In 92% of the cases, auto-contours were scored as clinically acceptable, with or without corrections.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A DL segmentation model was trained and was shown to be a time-efficient way to generate clinically acceptable contours for locally advanced breast cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/0d/main.PMC10205480.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly developed for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy. Qualitative analysis is of great importance for clinical implementation, next to quantitative. This study evaluates a DL segmentation model for left- and right-sided locally advanced breast cancer both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Methods

For each side a DL model was trained, including primary breast CTV (CTVp), lymph node levels 1–4, heart, lungs, humeral head, thyroid and esophagus. For evaluation, both automatic segmentation, including correction of contours when needed, and manual delineation was performed and both processes were timed. Quantitative scoring with dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (95%HD) and surface DSC (sDSC) was used to compare both the automatic (not-corrected) and corrected contours with the manual contours. Qualitative scoring was performed by five radiotherapy technologists and five radiation oncologists using a 3-point Likert scale.

Results

Time reduction was achieved using auto-segmentation in 95% of the cases, including correction. The time reduction (mean ± std) was 42.4% ± 26.5% and 58.5% ± 19.1% for OARs and CTVs, respectively, corresponding to an absolute mean reduction (hh:mm:ss) of 00:08:51 and 00:25:38. Good quantitative results were achieved before correction, e.g. mean DSC for the right-sided CTVp was 0.92 ± 0.06, whereas correction statistically significantly improved this contour by only 0.02 ± 0.05, respectively. In 92% of the cases, auto-contours were scored as clinically acceptable, with or without corrections.

Conclusions

A DL segmentation model was trained and was shown to be a time-efficient way to generate clinically acceptable contours for locally advanced breast cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期乳腺癌深度学习分割模型的临床评价
引言深度学习(DL)模型越来越多地被开发用于放射治疗中的自动分割。定性分析对临床实施非常重要,仅次于定量分析。本研究从定量和定性两个方面评估了左、右侧局部晚期癌症的DL分割模型。方法每侧训练一个DL模型,包括原发性乳腺CTV(CTVp)、淋巴结水平1-4、心脏、肺、肱骨头、甲状腺和食道。为了进行评估,执行了自动分割(包括在需要时校正轮廓)和手动描绘,并且两个过程都是定时的。使用骰子相似系数(DSC)、95%豪斯多夫距离(95%HD)和表面DSC(sDSC)进行定量评分,将自动(未校正)和校正轮廓与手动轮廓进行比较。定性评分由五名放射治疗技术人员和五名放射肿瘤学家使用三点Likert量表进行。结果在95%的病例中,使用自动分割可以减少时间,包括校正。OAR和CTV的时间减少(平均值±std)分别为42.4%±26.5%和58.5%±19.1%,对应于00:08:51和00:25:38的绝对平均减少(hh:mm:ss)。校正前获得了良好的定量结果,例如右侧CTVp的平均DSC为0.92±0.06,而校正在统计学上分别仅显著改善了0.02±0.05。在92%的病例中,自动轮廓被评分为临床可接受,无论是否校正。结论对局部晚期癌症进行了DL分割模型的训练,并证明其是一种生成临床可接受轮廓的时间有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
The status quo of global geriatric radiation oncology education: A scoping review A systematic review of prostate bed motion and anisotropic margins in post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy International virtual radiation therapy professional development: Reflections on a twinning collaboration between a low/middle and high income country A code orange for traffic-light-protocols as a communication mechanism in IGRT On the trail of CBCT-guided adaptive rectal boost radiotherapy, does daily delineation require a radiation oncologist?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1