Prognostic significance of splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy in patients with remnant gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis.

Seung Hyun Back, Sung Eun Oh, Ji Yeong An, Min-Gew Choi, Tae Sung Sohn, Jae Moon Bae, Jun Ho Lee
{"title":"Prognostic significance of splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy in patients with remnant gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Seung Hyun Back,&nbsp;Sung Eun Oh,&nbsp;Ji Yeong An,&nbsp;Min-Gew Choi,&nbsp;Tae Sung Sohn,&nbsp;Jae Moon Bae,&nbsp;Jun Ho Lee","doi":"10.14216/kjco.21015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Splenectomy for patients with remnant gastric cancer has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of splenectomy in the treatment of remnant gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 285 patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent completion total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy in Samsung Medical Center, between September 1996 and December 2017. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, and pathologic stage. After the matching process, we compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of follow-up was 58.0 months (range, 0-132 months). After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the splenectomy group (n=77) and no splenectomy group (n=77) in terms of clinicopathological features. The 5-year OS rate between the no splenectomy and splenectomy group were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between 5-year DFS of the matched groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenectomy is not a significant prognostic factor in terms of 5-year OS (no splenectomy vs. splenectomy; 61.5% vs. 60.2%, P=0.884) or DFS (74.9% vs. 69.8%, P=0.880).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Splenectomy has no impact on the OS and DFS in patients with remnant gastric cancer. Splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy may not be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":74045,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/83/18/kjco-17-2-96.PMC9942751.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.21015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Splenectomy for patients with remnant gastric cancer has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of splenectomy in the treatment of remnant gastric cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 285 patients with remnant gastric cancer who underwent completion total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy in Samsung Medical Center, between September 1996 and December 2017. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching method for the analysis. The matching factors were age, sex, and pathologic stage. After the matching process, we compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with and without splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy.

Results: The median duration of follow-up was 58.0 months (range, 0-132 months). After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the splenectomy group (n=77) and no splenectomy group (n=77) in terms of clinicopathological features. The 5-year OS rate between the no splenectomy and splenectomy group were not significantly different. There was no significant difference between 5-year DFS of the matched groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that splenectomy is not a significant prognostic factor in terms of 5-year OS (no splenectomy vs. splenectomy; 61.5% vs. 60.2%, P=0.884) or DFS (74.9% vs. 69.8%, P=0.880).

Conclusion: Splenectomy has no impact on the OS and DFS in patients with remnant gastric cancer. Splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy may not be necessary.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残余胃癌完全全胃切除术中脾切除术的预后意义:倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:残余胃癌的脾切除术一直存在争议。本研究的目的是确定脾切除术在残余胃癌治疗中的影响。方法:回顾性分析1996年9月至2017年12月在三星医疗中心行完整全胃切除或不切除脾的285例残余胃癌患者。我们使用1:1倾向评分匹配方法进行分析。匹配因素为年龄、性别、病理分期。在匹配过程后,我们比较了完成全胃切除术中脾切除术和不脾切除术患者的5年总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。结果:中位随访时间为58.0个月(范围0-132个月)。倾向评分匹配后,脾切除术组(n=77)与未脾切除术组(n=77)的临床病理特征差异无统计学意义。未脾切除术组与脾切除术组的5年生存率无显著性差异。配对组5年DFS差异无统计学意义。多因素分析显示,脾切除术不是5年OS的重要预后因素(未脾切除术vs.脾切除术;61.5%比60.2%,P = 0.884)或DFS(74.9%比69.8%,P = 0.880)。结论:脾切除术对残胃癌患者的OS和DFS无影响。完全性全胃切除术期间可能不需要脾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of tumor budding and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with clinicopathological parameters in gallbladder carcinoma. Clinical course of pancreas cancer diagnosed after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with borderline lesion: two case reports. Measurement of human peritoneal surface area using artificial intelligence software in abdominal computed tomography. Pancreatoduodenectomy with colon-last approach for advanced pancreatic head cancer. Prediction of the minimum amount of anti-adhesive agent required for entire intra-abdominal cavity using fluorescent dye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1