On the role of experience versus motivation in predicting the own-race effect

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12628
Ryan E. Tracy, Dvora Zomberg, Steven G. Young
{"title":"On the role of experience versus motivation in predicting the own-race effect","authors":"Ryan E. Tracy,&nbsp;Dvora Zomberg,&nbsp;Steven G. Young","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The other-race effect (ORE) is a longstanding phenomenon in experimental psychology, where recognition for same-race faces is superior than for other-race faces. The present research pits two competing theories of perceptual expertise and social motivation against each other to see which is the more robust predictor of the ORE. In Study 1, we measured Black and White participants' <i>prior</i> contact with individuals from the other-race (i.e. expertise) as well as their <i>expected</i> level of future interaction with other-race individuals (i.e. motivation). Of the two theories, anticipated interaction (i.e. motivation) emerged as a significant predictor of the ORE. Study 2 followed the same design, measuring motivation with a self-report assessment of how much participants are willing to have cross-race friendships. Here, neither experience nor motivation predicted the ORE, though an ORE was established. Differences in measures that assess motivation and the experience versus motivation debate are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"114 S1","pages":"172-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The other-race effect (ORE) is a longstanding phenomenon in experimental psychology, where recognition for same-race faces is superior than for other-race faces. The present research pits two competing theories of perceptual expertise and social motivation against each other to see which is the more robust predictor of the ORE. In Study 1, we measured Black and White participants' prior contact with individuals from the other-race (i.e. expertise) as well as their expected level of future interaction with other-race individuals (i.e. motivation). Of the two theories, anticipated interaction (i.e. motivation) emerged as a significant predictor of the ORE. Study 2 followed the same design, measuring motivation with a self-report assessment of how much participants are willing to have cross-race friendships. Here, neither experience nor motivation predicted the ORE, though an ORE was established. Differences in measures that assess motivation and the experience versus motivation debate are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经验与动机在预测本种族效应中的作用
异种族效应(ORE)是实验心理学中一种长期存在的现象,即对同种族面孔的识别优于对异种族面孔的识别。目前的研究将两种相互竞争的感知专业知识和社会动机理论相互对立,以确定哪种理论更能预测ORE。在研究1中,我们测量了黑人和白人参与者与其他种族个体(即专业知识)的先前接触,以及他们与其他种族个体未来互动的预期水平(即动机)。在这两种理论中,预期的互动(即动机)成为了ORE的重要预测因素。研究2遵循了相同的设计,通过自我报告评估参与者愿意建立跨种族友谊的程度来衡量动机。在这里,经验和动机都不能预测ORE,尽管建立了ORE。在评估动机和经验与动机的辩论措施的差异进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Automated face recognition assists with low-prevalence face identity mismatches but can bias users. The role of surface and structural similarities in the retrieval of realistic perceptual events. Daily effects of a brief compassion-focused intervention for self-compassion. Inter-brain synchrony is associated with greater shared identity within naturalistic conversational pairs. The differences in essential facial areas for impressions between humans and deep learning models: An eye-tracking and explainable AI approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1