Optimizing the Aging Brain: The BEAD Study on the Ethics of Dementia Prevention.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jfa.2023.6
M Andreoletti, C Lazzaroni, N Petersen, S Segawa, A Leibing, S Schicktanz, A Blasimme
{"title":"Optimizing the Aging Brain: The BEAD Study on the Ethics of Dementia Prevention.","authors":"M Andreoletti,&nbsp;C Lazzaroni,&nbsp;N Petersen,&nbsp;S Segawa,&nbsp;A Leibing,&nbsp;S Schicktanz,&nbsp;A Blasimme","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia has lately undergone a profound reconceptualization. Long conceived of as an unpreventable process of mental deterioration, current evidence shows that it can be prevented in at least one in three cases intervening on a specified set of factors. Issues of justice and equity loom large on the implementation of dementia prevention, from a global health perspective. Our project thus embraces emerging evidence about dementia risk factors and their uneven distribution nationally and globally by specifically focusing on the situated aspects of dementia prevention. The aim of the BEAD study (Optimizing the Aging Brain? Situating Ethical Aspects in Dementia Prevention) is to dissect the ethical and clinical assumptions of this novel understanding of dementia, and to analyze how such new discourse on dementia prevention plays out in three countries: Canada, Germany and Switzerland. This study adopts a multi-perspective, comparative, qualitative approach, combining stakeholder interviews with different kinds of focused ethnographies, elaborating on conceptual, ethical, and social aspects of what we would like to call the \"new dementia\". By situating the paradigmatic shifts in Alzheimer's and dementia research within current aging cultures and contemporary social policies, we aim to initiate a debate about the often implicit unresolved social, ethical, and political implications and preconditions of the medical understanding and handling of cognitive disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":75074,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"12 2","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dementia has lately undergone a profound reconceptualization. Long conceived of as an unpreventable process of mental deterioration, current evidence shows that it can be prevented in at least one in three cases intervening on a specified set of factors. Issues of justice and equity loom large on the implementation of dementia prevention, from a global health perspective. Our project thus embraces emerging evidence about dementia risk factors and their uneven distribution nationally and globally by specifically focusing on the situated aspects of dementia prevention. The aim of the BEAD study (Optimizing the Aging Brain? Situating Ethical Aspects in Dementia Prevention) is to dissect the ethical and clinical assumptions of this novel understanding of dementia, and to analyze how such new discourse on dementia prevention plays out in three countries: Canada, Germany and Switzerland. This study adopts a multi-perspective, comparative, qualitative approach, combining stakeholder interviews with different kinds of focused ethnographies, elaborating on conceptual, ethical, and social aspects of what we would like to call the "new dementia". By situating the paradigmatic shifts in Alzheimer's and dementia research within current aging cultures and contemporary social policies, we aim to initiate a debate about the often implicit unresolved social, ethical, and political implications and preconditions of the medical understanding and handling of cognitive disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化老化的大脑:痴呆预防伦理学的研究。
痴呆症最近经历了一次深刻的重新定义。长期以来被认为是一种不可预防的精神退化过程,目前的证据表明,至少三分之一的病例可以通过干预一系列特定因素来预防。从全球健康的角度来看,司法和公平问题在实施预防痴呆症方面显得尤为突出。因此,我们的项目通过特别关注痴呆症预防的情境方面,包含了有关痴呆症风险因素及其在国内和全球分布不均匀的新证据。这项研究的目的是优化老化的大脑?《痴呆症预防中的伦理问题》将剖析这种对痴呆症的新理解的伦理和临床假设,并分析这种关于痴呆症预防的新论述如何在三个国家:加拿大、德国和瑞士发挥作用。本研究采用多视角、比较、定性的方法,将利益相关者访谈与不同类型的重点民族志相结合,详细阐述了我们称之为“新型痴呆”的概念、伦理和社会方面。通过将阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症研究的范式转变置于当前老龄化文化和当代社会政策的背景下,我们旨在发起一场关于通常隐含的未解决的社会、伦理和政治影响以及医学理解和处理认知障碍的先决条件的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1