Long-term capacity planning for obstetric surgical suites using quantile linear regression.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/0310057X221127713
Franklin Dexter, Richard H Epstein, Kokila N Thenuwara
{"title":"Long-term capacity planning for obstetric surgical suites using quantile linear regression.","authors":"Franklin Dexter,&nbsp;Richard H Epstein,&nbsp;Kokila N Thenuwara","doi":"10.1177/0310057X221127713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstetric surgical suites differ from most inpatient surgical suites, serving one specialty, and often small. We evaluated long-term capacity planning for these operating rooms. The retrospective cohort study included all caesarean births in three operating rooms over 28 years, 1994 through 2021, plus all other obstetric procedures over the latter 19 years. We calculated the obstetric anaesthesia activity index, 0.5 × neuraxial labour analgesia placement + 1.0 × caesarean births. Annual caesarean births from one year to the next had a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.993. Therefore, linear regression can be used for long-term capacity planning. However, the difference between 0.9 and 0.1 quantiles in weekly caseloads was greater than tenfold larger than the annual rate of growth in births per week. Therefore, clinicians likely would be unable to distinguish, by experience, between growth versus being busy due to variability, suggesting value of the modelling. Over 19 years, the fraction of the obstetric workload from caesarean births was unchanging, Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.04. Therefore, use of the obstetric anaesthesia activity index to judge changes in workload was appropriate. The annual total for the index increased linearly, Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.98, supporting validity of the finding that long-term capacity can be planned with linear regression. The difference between 0.9 and 0.1 quantiles in weekly totals of the index exceeded annual rate of growth, supporting validity of the finding that variability week to week is very large relative to growth. These results help decision-makers ensure that operating rooms and staff meet referring hospitals' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"178-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X221127713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstetric surgical suites differ from most inpatient surgical suites, serving one specialty, and often small. We evaluated long-term capacity planning for these operating rooms. The retrospective cohort study included all caesarean births in three operating rooms over 28 years, 1994 through 2021, plus all other obstetric procedures over the latter 19 years. We calculated the obstetric anaesthesia activity index, 0.5 × neuraxial labour analgesia placement + 1.0 × caesarean births. Annual caesarean births from one year to the next had a Pearson linear correlation coefficient of 0.993. Therefore, linear regression can be used for long-term capacity planning. However, the difference between 0.9 and 0.1 quantiles in weekly caseloads was greater than tenfold larger than the annual rate of growth in births per week. Therefore, clinicians likely would be unable to distinguish, by experience, between growth versus being busy due to variability, suggesting value of the modelling. Over 19 years, the fraction of the obstetric workload from caesarean births was unchanging, Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.04. Therefore, use of the obstetric anaesthesia activity index to judge changes in workload was appropriate. The annual total for the index increased linearly, Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.98, supporting validity of the finding that long-term capacity can be planned with linear regression. The difference between 0.9 and 0.1 quantiles in weekly totals of the index exceeded annual rate of growth, supporting validity of the finding that variability week to week is very large relative to growth. These results help decision-makers ensure that operating rooms and staff meet referring hospitals' needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用分位数线性回归的产科外科套房的长期容量规划。
产科外科套房不同于大多数住院外科套房,服务于一个专业,往往很小。我们评估了这些手术室的长期容量规划。这项回顾性队列研究包括1994年至2021年28年间在三间手术室进行的所有剖腹产手术,以及后19年的所有其他产科手术。计算产科麻醉活动指数,0.5 ×神经轴分娩镇痛放置+ 1.0 ×剖宫产。年剖宫产数与年剖宫产数的Pearson线性相关系数为0.993。因此,线性回归可以用于长期容量规划。然而,每周病例数量的0.9和0.1分位数之间的差异比每周出生的年增长率大十倍以上。因此,临床医生可能无法根据经验区分生长与忙碌之间的差异,这表明了模型的价值。19年来,剖腹产在产科工作量中所占的比例没有变化,Pearson相关系数为0.04。因此,使用产科麻醉活动指数来判断工作量的变化是合适的。该指标的年总量呈线性增长,Pearson相关系数为0.98,支持线性回归对长期产能进行规划的有效性。该指数每周总量的0.9和0.1分位数之间的差异超过了年增长率,支持了周与周的变异性相对于增长率非常大的发现的有效性。这些结果有助于决策者确保手术室和工作人员满足转诊医院的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Experiences and outcomes of patients participating in a perioperative shared decision-making pathway. JG Farrell and The Lung: An early description of intensive care delirium in literature. Promoting behavioural change by educating anaesthetists about the environmental impact of inhalational anaesthetic agents: A systematic review. MET call prevention. A cross-sectional study of the relationship between iron deficiency anaemia and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1