Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pierre-Louis Naillon, Valentin Flaudias, Georges Brousse, Catherine Laporte, Julien S Baker, Valentin Brusseau, Aurélie Comptour, Marek Zak, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Frédéric Dutheil
{"title":"Cannabis Use in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Pierre-Louis Naillon,&nbsp;Valentin Flaudias,&nbsp;Georges Brousse,&nbsp;Catherine Laporte,&nbsp;Julien S Baker,&nbsp;Valentin Brusseau,&nbsp;Aurélie Comptour,&nbsp;Marek Zak,&nbsp;Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois,&nbsp;Frédéric Dutheil","doi":"10.3390/medicines10050029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Cannabis use by physicians can be detrimental for them and their patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of cannabis use by medical doctors (MDs)/students. <b>Method</b>: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect were searched for studies reporting cannabis use in MDs/students. For each frequency of use (lifetime/past year/past month/daily), we stratified a random effect meta-analysis depending on specialties, education level, continents, and periods of time, which were further compared using meta-regressions. <b>Results</b>: We included 54 studies with a total of 42,936 MDs/students: 20,267 MDs, 20,063 medical students, and 1976 residents. Overall, 37% had used cannabis at least once over their lifetime, 14% over the past year, 8% over the past month and 1.1 per thousand (‱) had a daily use. Medical students had a greater cannabis use than MDs over their lifetime (38% vs. 35%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the past year (24% vs. 5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the past month (10% vs. 2%, <i>p</i> < 0.05), without significance for daily use (0.5% vs. 0.05%, NS). Insufficient data precluded comparisons among medical specialties. MDs/students from Asian countries seemed to have the lowest cannabis use: 16% over their lifetime, 10% in the past year, 1% in the past month, and 0.4% daily. Regarding periods of time, cannabis use seems to follow a U-shape, with a high use before 1990, followed by a decrease between 1990 and 2005, and a rebound after 2005. Younger and male MDs/students had the highest cannabis use. <b>Conclusions</b>: If more than a third of MDs tried cannabis at least once in their lifetime, this means its daily use is low but not uncommon (1.1‱). Medical students are the biggest cannabis users. Despite being common worldwide, cannabis use is predominant in the West, with a rebound since 2005 making salient those public health interventions during the early stage of medical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74162,"journal":{"name":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10221702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines10050029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use by physicians can be detrimental for them and their patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of cannabis use by medical doctors (MDs)/students. Method: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo and ScienceDirect were searched for studies reporting cannabis use in MDs/students. For each frequency of use (lifetime/past year/past month/daily), we stratified a random effect meta-analysis depending on specialties, education level, continents, and periods of time, which were further compared using meta-regressions. Results: We included 54 studies with a total of 42,936 MDs/students: 20,267 MDs, 20,063 medical students, and 1976 residents. Overall, 37% had used cannabis at least once over their lifetime, 14% over the past year, 8% over the past month and 1.1 per thousand (‱) had a daily use. Medical students had a greater cannabis use than MDs over their lifetime (38% vs. 35%, p < 0.001), the past year (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and the past month (10% vs. 2%, p < 0.05), without significance for daily use (0.5% vs. 0.05%, NS). Insufficient data precluded comparisons among medical specialties. MDs/students from Asian countries seemed to have the lowest cannabis use: 16% over their lifetime, 10% in the past year, 1% in the past month, and 0.4% daily. Regarding periods of time, cannabis use seems to follow a U-shape, with a high use before 1990, followed by a decrease between 1990 and 2005, and a rebound after 2005. Younger and male MDs/students had the highest cannabis use. Conclusions: If more than a third of MDs tried cannabis at least once in their lifetime, this means its daily use is low but not uncommon (1.1‱). Medical students are the biggest cannabis users. Despite being common worldwide, cannabis use is predominant in the West, with a rebound since 2005 making salient those public health interventions during the early stage of medical studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻在医生中的使用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:医生使用大麻对他们和他们的病人都是有害的。我们对医生/学生使用大麻的流行程度进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、PsycInfo和ScienceDirect中报告医学博士/学生使用大麻的研究。对于每个使用频率(终生/过去一年/过去一个月/每天),我们根据专业、教育水平、大洲和时间段对随机效应元分析进行分层,并进一步使用元回归进行比较。结果:我们纳入54项研究,共纳入42,936名医学博士/学生:20,267名医学博士,20,063名医学生和1976名住院医生。总体而言,37%的人在其一生中至少使用过一次大麻,14%的人在过去一年中使用过大麻,8%的人在过去一个月中使用过大麻,1.1‰的人每天使用大麻。医学生一生中使用大麻的比例大于医学博士(38%对35%,p < 0.001),过去一年(24%对5%,p < 0.001)和过去一个月(10%对2%,p < 0.05),每日使用大麻的比例无统计学意义(0.5%对0.05%,NS)。数据不足妨碍了医学专业间的比较。来自亚洲国家的医学博士/学生似乎使用大麻最少:一生中16%,过去一年10%,过去一个月1%,每天0.4%。就时间段而言,大麻的使用似乎呈u形,1990年之前使用量很大,随后在1990年至2005年期间减少,2005年之后出现反弹。年轻和男性医学博士/学生的大麻使用量最高。结论:如果超过三分之一的医学博士在其一生中至少尝试过一次大麻,这意味着大麻的日常使用量很低,但并不罕见(1.1)。医科学生是最大的大麻使用者。尽管大麻在全世界都很普遍,但在西方占主导地位,自2005年以来的反弹突出了医学研究早期阶段的公共卫生干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Breathing for Two: Asthma Management, Treatment, and Safety of Pharmacological Therapy during Pregnancy. GDF15 Targeting for Treatment of Hyperemesis Gravidarum. Deciphering Mechanisms, Prevention Strategies, Management Plans, Medications, and Research Techniques for Strokes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: Insight into Pathological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Benefits of Chinese Herbal Medicines. Incidence and Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccine Hypersensitivity Reactions and Success of COVID-19 Vaccine Provocation Tests Post Previous COVID-19 Vaccine Hypersensitivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1