The Validity of Heart Rate Variability Obtained from Electrocardiography and Blood Pressure in Rats Subjected to Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Ischemia.

Maryam Farokhipour, Farzaneh Ketabchi
{"title":"The Validity of Heart Rate Variability Obtained from Electrocardiography and Blood Pressure in Rats Subjected to Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Ischemia.","authors":"Maryam Farokhipour,&nbsp;Farzaneh Ketabchi","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart rate variability (HRV) is calculated by electrocardiography (ECG-HRV) or blood pressure (BP-HRV). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the above methods in rats with normal and ischemic hearts during the baroreflex maneuver.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, in 2021. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a sham group and an isoproterenol-mediated cardiac ischemia (ISO) group. Saline and isoproterenol (150 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously for 2 consecutive days in the sham and ISO groups, respectively. Then, the animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (60 mg/kg), and the femoral artery and vein were cannulated. Baroreflex was activated using an intravenous injection of phenylephrine (10 μg/100 μL saline). ECG, BP, and heart rate (HR) were recorded, and the time domain of HRV and baroreflex gain were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baroreflex gain in the ISO group (male, weight=275.8±2.8 g, n=8) was lower than that in the sham group (male, weight=258±2.3 g, n=8) (P<0.05). ECG-HRV indicated an increase in the standard deviation of the RR interval (SDRR), the index of overall HRV, and the parasympathetic index of the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in both groups. However, the rise in SDRR and RMSSD in the ISO group was less than that in the sham group (P<0.05). SDRR and RMSSD obtained from BP did not show a difference between the sham and ISO groups, nor did they correspond with the results seen in baroreflex gain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BP-HRV was not as valuable as ECG-HRV in assessing cardiac ischemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"18 1","pages":"33-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/6d/JTHC-18-33.PMC10225032.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) is calculated by electrocardiography (ECG-HRV) or blood pressure (BP-HRV). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the above methods in rats with normal and ischemic hearts during the baroreflex maneuver.

Methods: The study was conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, in 2021. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into a sham group and an isoproterenol-mediated cardiac ischemia (ISO) group. Saline and isoproterenol (150 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously for 2 consecutive days in the sham and ISO groups, respectively. Then, the animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (60 mg/kg), and the femoral artery and vein were cannulated. Baroreflex was activated using an intravenous injection of phenylephrine (10 μg/100 μL saline). ECG, BP, and heart rate (HR) were recorded, and the time domain of HRV and baroreflex gain were calculated.

Results: Baroreflex gain in the ISO group (male, weight=275.8±2.8 g, n=8) was lower than that in the sham group (male, weight=258±2.3 g, n=8) (P<0.05). ECG-HRV indicated an increase in the standard deviation of the RR interval (SDRR), the index of overall HRV, and the parasympathetic index of the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in both groups. However, the rise in SDRR and RMSSD in the ISO group was less than that in the sham group (P<0.05). SDRR and RMSSD obtained from BP did not show a difference between the sham and ISO groups, nor did they correspond with the results seen in baroreflex gain.

Conclusion: BP-HRV was not as valuable as ECG-HRV in assessing cardiac ischemia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异丙肾上腺素致心脏缺血大鼠心电图和血压心率变异性的有效性。
背景:心率变异性(HRV)是通过心电图(ECG-HRV)或血压(BP-HRV)来计算的。本研究的目的是确定上述方法在正常心脏和缺血心脏大鼠的压力反射操作中的有效性。方法:该研究于2021年在伊朗设拉子的设拉子医学大学进行。将Sprague-Dawley大鼠分为假手术组和异丙肾上腺素介导的心脏缺血(ISO)组。假手术组和ISO组分别皮下注射生理盐水和异丙肾上腺素(150 mg/kg),连续2天。然后腹腔注射硫喷妥钠(60 mg/kg)麻醉大鼠,留置股动脉和股静脉。静脉注射苯肾上腺素(10 μg/100 μL生理盐水)激活Baroreflex。记录心电图、血压、心率(HR),计算HRV时域和压反射增益。结果:ISO组(男性,体重=275.8±2.8 g, n=8)血压反射增加明显低于假手术组(男性,体重=258±2.3 g, n=8)。结论:BP-HRV在评估心脏缺血方面不如ECG-HRV有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospitalization Rates due to Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. Heart Xenotransplantation: Current Issues and Perspectives. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and High-Risk Features in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Multicenter Study. Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension among 10663 Adults Based on the Baseline Data of the Kherameh Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1