Role of Surface Electrocardiography in Differentiation between Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Mahsa Nourani, Mehdi Mirzaie, Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli, Amirfarjam Fazelifar, Majid Haghjoo
{"title":"Role of Surface Electrocardiography in Differentiation between Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Mahsa Nourani,&nbsp;Mehdi Mirzaie,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli,&nbsp;Amirfarjam Fazelifar,&nbsp;Majid Haghjoo","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrocardiography (ECG), as an easily accessible modality, is usually helpful in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of ECG in differentiating between obstructive (OHCM) and non-obstructive (NOHCM) HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is a cross-sectional analysis of HCM patients referred to our center between 2008 and 2017. The study variables included age, sex, clinical presentation, medications, and ECG characteristics including PR interval, QRS width, QTc duration, Tpeak-Tend interval, QRS axis, QRS transition, ventricular hypertrophies, atrial abnormalities, ST-T abnormalities, and abnormal Q waves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HCM sample consisted of 200 patients (55% males; age 45.60±15.50 y) from our HCM database. We compared the clinical and ECG characteristics of 143 NOHCM patients with those of 57 OHCM patients. The OHCM group was significantly younger than the NOHCM group (age =41.7 vs 47.0 y; P=0.016). The initial clinical presentation was similar between the 2 forms (P>0.05), and palpitations were the dominant symptom. Baseline ECG intervals, including PR (155.6 vs 157.9 ms), QRS (82.5 vs 82.0 ms), and QTc (430.5 vs 433.0 ms), were similar (all Ps>0.050). There were no differences regarding baseline rhythm, atrial abnormalities, QRS transition, ventricular hypertrophies, axis changes, ST-T changes, and abnormal Q waves between the HCM groups (all Ps>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showed that standard 12-lead ECG had no role in distinguishing patients with the obstructive and non-obstructive forms of HCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"18 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/dc/JTHC-18-46.PMC10225031.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v18i1.12581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiography (ECG), as an easily accessible modality, is usually helpful in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of ECG in differentiating between obstructive (OHCM) and non-obstructive (NOHCM) HCM.

Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional analysis of HCM patients referred to our center between 2008 and 2017. The study variables included age, sex, clinical presentation, medications, and ECG characteristics including PR interval, QRS width, QTc duration, Tpeak-Tend interval, QRS axis, QRS transition, ventricular hypertrophies, atrial abnormalities, ST-T abnormalities, and abnormal Q waves.

Results: The HCM sample consisted of 200 patients (55% males; age 45.60±15.50 y) from our HCM database. We compared the clinical and ECG characteristics of 143 NOHCM patients with those of 57 OHCM patients. The OHCM group was significantly younger than the NOHCM group (age =41.7 vs 47.0 y; P=0.016). The initial clinical presentation was similar between the 2 forms (P>0.05), and palpitations were the dominant symptom. Baseline ECG intervals, including PR (155.6 vs 157.9 ms), QRS (82.5 vs 82.0 ms), and QTc (430.5 vs 433.0 ms), were similar (all Ps>0.050). There were no differences regarding baseline rhythm, atrial abnormalities, QRS transition, ventricular hypertrophies, axis changes, ST-T changes, and abnormal Q waves between the HCM groups (all Ps>0.05).

Conclusion: The present study showed that standard 12-lead ECG had no role in distinguishing patients with the obstructive and non-obstructive forms of HCM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体表心电图在鉴别梗阻性和非梗阻性肥厚性心肌病中的作用。
背景:心电图(ECG)作为一种容易获得的方法,通常有助于肥厚性心肌病(HCM)的诊断。本研究的目的是评估心电图在区分阻塞性(OHCM)和非阻塞性(NOHCM) HCM中的作用。方法:本研究对2008年至2017年在本中心就诊的HCM患者进行横断面分析。研究变量包括年龄、性别、临床表现、药物和心电图特征,包括PR间期、QRS宽度、QTc持续时间、Tpeak-Tend间期、QRS轴、QRS过渡、心室肥厚、心房异常、ST-T异常和异常Q波。结果:HCM样本包括200例患者(55%男性;年龄45.60±15.50岁),来自我们的HCM数据库。我们比较143例NOHCM患者和57例OHCM患者的临床和心电图特征。OHCM组明显比NOHCM组年轻(年龄=41.7 vs 47.0;P = 0.016)。两种形式的初始临床表现相似(P>0.05),心悸为主要症状。基线心电图间隔,包括PR (155.6 vs 157.9 ms)、QRS (82.5 vs 82.0 ms)和QTc (430.5 vs 433.0 ms)相似(所有Ps>0.050)。HCM组间基线心律、心房异常、QRS过渡、室性肥厚、心轴变化、ST-T变化、异常Q波等差异无统计学意义(均p >0.05)。结论:标准12导联心电图对区分梗阻性和非梗阻性HCM没有作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospitalization Rates due to Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. Heart Xenotransplantation: Current Issues and Perspectives. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and High-Risk Features in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Multicenter Study. Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension among 10663 Adults Based on the Baseline Data of the Kherameh Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1