Efficacy of a Gastroscope for Cecal Intubation during Colonoscopy in Patients with Severe Sigmoid Adhesion.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000528449
Jun Takada, Yukari Uno, Koji Yamashita, Masamichi Arao, Masaya Kubota, Takashi Ibuka, Hiroshi Araki, Masahito Shimizu
{"title":"Efficacy of a Gastroscope for Cecal Intubation during Colonoscopy in Patients with Severe Sigmoid Adhesion.","authors":"Jun Takada,&nbsp;Yukari Uno,&nbsp;Koji Yamashita,&nbsp;Masamichi Arao,&nbsp;Masaya Kubota,&nbsp;Takashi Ibuka,&nbsp;Hiroshi Araki,&nbsp;Masahito Shimizu","doi":"10.1159/000528449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cecal intubation during colonoscopy is difficult to achieve in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. This retrospective observational study assessed the efficacy of using a gastroscope for colonoscopy in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. Furthermore, the ability of computed tomography (CT) to predict the possibility of cecal intubation using a gastroscope was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,626 patients who underwent colonoscopy for total colon observation by one endoscopist were enrolled. Cecal intubation rate and other procedure-related outcomes were evaluated. We also investigated whether identification of the sigmoid colon pathway by CT was involved in cecal intubation rate using a gastroscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the enrolled patients, cecal intubation by colonoscope was not feasible in 19 patients (1.2%) because of severe sigmoid adhesions. Cecal intubation was possible in 13 patients (68.4%) using a gastroscope, and the cecal intubation rate of peritoneal carcinomatosis (0%, p < 0.01) was significantly lower than that of other causes such as a diverticulum (100%) and history of gynecologic surgery (80%). The identifiable case of the sigmoid colon pathway by horizontal section on CT showed significantly higher cecal intubation rate compared to those of unidentifiable cases (92.3% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a gastroscope is effective in performing cecal intubation during colonoscopy in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. However, in patients with sigmoid adhesions caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis, cecal intubation may be difficult, even when a gastroscope is used. The ability of CT to identify the sigmoid colon pathway may predict success of cecal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cecal intubation during colonoscopy is difficult to achieve in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. This retrospective observational study assessed the efficacy of using a gastroscope for colonoscopy in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. Furthermore, the ability of computed tomography (CT) to predict the possibility of cecal intubation using a gastroscope was examined.

Methods: A total of 1,626 patients who underwent colonoscopy for total colon observation by one endoscopist were enrolled. Cecal intubation rate and other procedure-related outcomes were evaluated. We also investigated whether identification of the sigmoid colon pathway by CT was involved in cecal intubation rate using a gastroscope.

Results: Of the enrolled patients, cecal intubation by colonoscope was not feasible in 19 patients (1.2%) because of severe sigmoid adhesions. Cecal intubation was possible in 13 patients (68.4%) using a gastroscope, and the cecal intubation rate of peritoneal carcinomatosis (0%, p < 0.01) was significantly lower than that of other causes such as a diverticulum (100%) and history of gynecologic surgery (80%). The identifiable case of the sigmoid colon pathway by horizontal section on CT showed significantly higher cecal intubation rate compared to those of unidentifiable cases (92.3% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Using a gastroscope is effective in performing cecal intubation during colonoscopy in patients with severe sigmoid adhesions. However, in patients with sigmoid adhesions caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis, cecal intubation may be difficult, even when a gastroscope is used. The ability of CT to identify the sigmoid colon pathway may predict success of cecal intubation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重乙状结肠粘连患者结肠镜检查时胃镜下盲肠插管的疗效。
背景:严重乙状结肠粘连患者在结肠镜检查时难以实现盲肠插管。这项回顾性观察性研究评估了在严重乙状结肠粘连患者中使用胃镜进行结肠镜检查的疗效。此外,计算机断层扫描(CT)的能力,以预测盲肠插管的可能性使用胃镜进行了检查。方法:共纳入1626例由一名内镜医师行结肠镜检查观察全结肠的患者。评估盲肠插管率和其他手术相关结果。我们还研究了CT对乙状结肠路径的识别是否与胃镜下盲肠插管率有关。结果:在纳入的患者中,由于严重的乙状结肠粘连,19例(1.2%)患者无法通过结肠镜进行盲肠插管。13例(68.4%)患者在胃镜下可行盲肠插管,其中腹膜癌的盲肠插管率(0%,p < 0.01)明显低于憩室(100%)和有妇科手术史(80%)等其他原因的盲肠插管率。在CT水平切片上发现乙状结肠通道的病例,盲肠插管率明显高于未发现病例(92.3% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01)。结论:在严重乙状结肠粘连的结肠镜下行盲肠插管是有效的。然而,在腹膜癌引起乙状结肠粘连的患者中,即使使用胃镜,盲肠插管也可能很困难。CT识别乙状结肠通路的能力可以预测盲肠插管的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1