Evaluation of first ray instability using the double dorsiflexion test: A prospective observational case-controlled study

Q2 Health Professions Foot Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2023.102019
Chandra Pasapula , Georgios Solomou , Ahmad Al-Sukaini , Ignatius Liew , James Goetz , Steven Cutts
{"title":"Evaluation of first ray instability using the double dorsiflexion test: A prospective observational case-controlled study","authors":"Chandra Pasapula ,&nbsp;Georgios Solomou ,&nbsp;Ahmad Al-Sukaini ,&nbsp;Ignatius Liew ,&nbsp;James Goetz ,&nbsp;Steven Cutts","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2023.102019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-Ray (FR) stability allows for foot propulsion in-stance, taking 60% weight. First-ray instability (FRI) is associated with middle column overload, synovitis, deformity and osteoarthritis. Clinical detection can still be challenging. We propose to develop a clinical test that helps identify FRI using two simple manual manoeuvres.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>10 patients with unilateral FRI were recruited. Unaffected contralateral feet were used as controls. Stringent exclusion criteria were applied including hallux MTP pain, laxity, inflammatory arthropathy and collagen disorders. A Klauemeter directly measured the sagittal plane dorsal first metatarsal head translation of affected vs unaffected feet. Maximum passive proximal phalanx 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion was measured using a video capture and Tracker motion software analysis with and without applying a dorsal force at the 1st metatarsal head using a Newton meter. Proximal phalanx motion was compared in affected vs unaffected feet with and without dorsal metatarsal head force application and compared to direct measurements using the Klaumeter. P value of &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FRI feet had dorsal translation greater than 8 mm (median, 11.94; interquartile range [IQR], 10.23–13.81) vs 1.77 for unaffected control feet was (median, 1.77; interquartile range [IQR], 1.23–2.96) using the Klauemeter. The percentage reduction in 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion ROM when applying the double dorsiflexion test FRI (mean reduction of 67.98%) when compared to control feet (mean reduction of 28.44%)(P &lt; 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that a 50% reduction in dorsiflexion ROM of 1st MTPJ when performing the double dorsiflexion test achieved a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 90% (AUC =0.990, 95%CI [0.958–1.000], P &gt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The double dorsiflexion (DDF) is easy to perform with two relatively simple manual manoeuvres that avoids the need for complex instrumented and radiation-based assessment. Greater than 50% decrease in proximal phalanx motion has an over 90% sensitivity in identifying feet with FRI.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>This was a prospective case-controlled study of consecutive cases of a level II evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259223000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

First-Ray (FR) stability allows for foot propulsion in-stance, taking 60% weight. First-ray instability (FRI) is associated with middle column overload, synovitis, deformity and osteoarthritis. Clinical detection can still be challenging. We propose to develop a clinical test that helps identify FRI using two simple manual manoeuvres.

Methods

10 patients with unilateral FRI were recruited. Unaffected contralateral feet were used as controls. Stringent exclusion criteria were applied including hallux MTP pain, laxity, inflammatory arthropathy and collagen disorders. A Klauemeter directly measured the sagittal plane dorsal first metatarsal head translation of affected vs unaffected feet. Maximum passive proximal phalanx 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion was measured using a video capture and Tracker motion software analysis with and without applying a dorsal force at the 1st metatarsal head using a Newton meter. Proximal phalanx motion was compared in affected vs unaffected feet with and without dorsal metatarsal head force application and compared to direct measurements using the Klaumeter. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

FRI feet had dorsal translation greater than 8 mm (median, 11.94; interquartile range [IQR], 10.23–13.81) vs 1.77 for unaffected control feet was (median, 1.77; interquartile range [IQR], 1.23–2.96) using the Klauemeter. The percentage reduction in 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion ROM when applying the double dorsiflexion test FRI (mean reduction of 67.98%) when compared to control feet (mean reduction of 28.44%)(P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that a 50% reduction in dorsiflexion ROM of 1st MTPJ when performing the double dorsiflexion test achieved a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 90% (AUC =0.990, 95%CI [0.958–1.000], P > 0.0001).

Conclusion

The double dorsiflexion (DDF) is easy to perform with two relatively simple manual manoeuvres that avoids the need for complex instrumented and radiation-based assessment. Greater than 50% decrease in proximal phalanx motion has an over 90% sensitivity in identifying feet with FRI.

Level of Evidence

This was a prospective case-controlled study of consecutive cases of a level II evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用双背屈试验评估第一射线不稳定性:一项前瞻性观察病例对照研究。
背景:第一光线(FR)的稳定性允许在站立时脚部推进,承受60%的重量。第一射线不稳定(FRI)与中柱超负荷、滑膜炎、畸形和骨关节炎有关。临床检测仍然具有挑战性。我们建议开发一种临床测试,使用两种简单的手动操作来帮助识别FRI。方法:收集10例单侧FRI患者。未受影响的对侧足被用作对照。采用严格的排除标准,包括拇MTP疼痛、松弛、炎症性关节病和胶原紊乱。Klauemeter直接测量受影响与未受影响足部的第一跖骨背侧矢状面平移。使用视频捕捉和Tracker运动软件分析,使用牛顿计在第一跖骨头处施加和不施加背向力的情况下,测量最大被动近节指骨第一MTP关节背屈。比较了在施加和不施加跖骨背头力的情况下受影响和未受影响的脚的近节指骨运动,并与使用Klaumeter的直接测量进行了比较。结果的P值:使用Klauemeter,FRI足的背侧平移大于8 mm(中位数11.94;四分位间距[IQR],10.23-13.81),而未受影响的对照足的背向平移为1.77(中位数1.77;四分位数间距[IKR],1.23-2.96)。与对照足(平均减少28.44%)相比,应用双背屈测试FRI时第一MTP关节背屈ROM的减少百分比(平均减少67.98%)(P 0.0001)。结论:双背屈(DDF)通过两种相对简单的手动操作很容易执行,无需复杂的仪器和基于辐射的评估。近节指骨运动减少50%以上,识别FRI足的敏感性超过90%。证据水平:这是一项前瞻性病例对照研究,对II级证据的连续病例进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of custom hard-shell 3D-printed foot orthoses in a cohort of patients who did not respond to treatment with custom ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) foot orthoses Regional changes in the free Achilles tendon volume in response to repeated submaximal contractions Mechanical drivers of intrinsic foot muscle for maximum toe flexor strength in upright standing across different body size Accuracy and reliability of the Ipswich touch test in identifying loss of protective sensation among diabetic patients Predictors of poor pre-operative patient reported outcome measures in elective foot and ankle surgery: Analysis of 1217 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1