The Pragmatic Role of COVID-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients with Contemporary ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Ata Firouzi, Zahra Hosseini, Zeinab Norouzi, Zohre Hosseini, Afshin Amirpour, Hamed Talakoob, Arash Amin, Abbas Soleimani, Nasrolah Moradifar, Shahrokh Karbalai, Mohammadhossein Mozafarybazargani, Hamidreza Hekmat, Majid Maleki, Parham Sadeghipour, Seyedeh Mahnaz Mirbod, Mina Ghorbanpoor Kohnaki, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Masoomeh Kalaei Nia, Fatemeh Sadate Habibizade, Sara Iraninejad, Mohammadreza Baay, Ehsan Khalilipur
{"title":"The Pragmatic Role of COVID-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients with Contemporary ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Ata Firouzi,&nbsp;Zahra Hosseini,&nbsp;Zeinab Norouzi,&nbsp;Zohre Hosseini,&nbsp;Afshin Amirpour,&nbsp;Hamed Talakoob,&nbsp;Arash Amin,&nbsp;Abbas Soleimani,&nbsp;Nasrolah Moradifar,&nbsp;Shahrokh Karbalai,&nbsp;Mohammadhossein Mozafarybazargani,&nbsp;Hamidreza Hekmat,&nbsp;Majid Maleki,&nbsp;Parham Sadeghipour,&nbsp;Seyedeh Mahnaz Mirbod,&nbsp;Mina Ghorbanpoor Kohnaki,&nbsp;Hooman Bakhshandeh,&nbsp;Masoomeh Kalaei Nia,&nbsp;Fatemeh Sadate Habibizade,&nbsp;Sara Iraninejad,&nbsp;Mohammadreza Baay,&nbsp;Ehsan Khalilipur","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"17 3","pages":"103-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/e1/JTHC-17-103.PMC10222945.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v17i3.10842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002).

Conclusion: In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对当代st段抬高型心肌梗死患者血栓分级的实际作用
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者合并st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的临床结局数据有限。方法:这项在伊朗6个中心进行的多中心研究旨在比较病例组(包括COVID-19 STEMI患者)和对照组(包括COVID-19大流行前的STEMI患者)之间的基线临床和程序数据,并确定院内梗死相关动脉血栓等级和主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs), MACCEs定义为任何原因(心血管和非心血管)死亡、非致死性中风、以及支架血栓形成。结果:两组患者基线特征无显著差异。72.9%的病例和98.5%的对照组行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI) (P=0.043); 6.2%的病例和1.4%的对照组行了冠状动脉旁路移植术(P=0.048)。病例组成功的PPCI手术(最终TIMI流量等级III)明显更少(66.5% vs 93.5%;P = 0.001)。两组患者过线前血栓的基线等级差异无统计学意义。病例组IV级和V级血栓发生率之和为75%,对照组为82% (P=0.432)。病例组和对照组MACCEs发生率分别为14.5%和2.1% (P=0.002)。结论:在我们的研究中,病例组与对照组之间血栓等级无显著差异;然而,病例组的无回流现象、术中心肌梗死、机械性并发症和MACCEs的住院率在统计学上显著高于病例组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospitalization Rates due to Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. Heart Xenotransplantation: Current Issues and Perspectives. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and High-Risk Features in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Multicenter Study. Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension among 10663 Adults Based on the Baseline Data of the Kherameh Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1