{"title":"First-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the immuno-oncology era: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu Fujiwara, Hirotaka Miyashita, Bobby C Liaw","doi":"10.1007/s00262-022-03341-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), either alone or in combination, confers a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for metastatic RCC in the first-line setting. However, guidance for optimal treatment selection in elderly patients remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line regimens for patients with advanced RCC older than 65 years old. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Indirect comparisons of available regimens were estimated using a random-effects network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 and five RCTs were eligible for PFS and OS analyses. Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) were associated with improved OS. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, and cabozantinib alone each showed improved PFS over sunitinib. Among these, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed better PFS than pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), but no PFS difference compared to nivolumab plus cabozantinib (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.03) and cabozantinib alone (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77). Network ranking showed pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib provided the favored OS and PFS benefit for elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of ICB with TKI such as pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib needs to be considered over monotherapy in the elderly population, but further validation using real-world data or prospective trials is necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for the geriatric population with advanced RCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"72 6","pages":"1355-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10991449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03341-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), either alone or in combination, confers a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for metastatic RCC in the first-line setting. However, guidance for optimal treatment selection in elderly patients remains limited.
Methods: A database search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating first-line regimens for patients with advanced RCC older than 65 years old. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Indirect comparisons of available regimens were estimated using a random-effects network meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 14 and five RCTs were eligible for PFS and OS analyses. Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) were associated with improved OS. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, and cabozantinib alone each showed improved PFS over sunitinib. Among these, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed better PFS than pembrolizumab plus axitinib (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), but no PFS difference compared to nivolumab plus cabozantinib (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.03) and cabozantinib alone (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77). Network ranking showed pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib provided the favored OS and PFS benefit for elderly patients.
Conclusions: The combination of ICB with TKI such as pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib needs to be considered over monotherapy in the elderly population, but further validation using real-world data or prospective trials is necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for the geriatric population with advanced RCC.
背景:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)或免疫检查点阻断剂(ICB),无论是单独使用还是联合使用,都能在一线治疗转移性RCC的过程中为患者带来显著的总生存期(OS)获益。然而,老年患者的最佳治疗选择指南仍然有限:方法:通过数据库检索,确定了符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了65岁以上晚期RCC患者的一线治疗方案。主要结果为无进展生存期(PFS)和OS。采用随机效应网络荟萃分析对现有方案进行间接比较:共有14项和5项研究符合PFS和OS分析条件。与舒尼替尼相比,pembrolizumab联合阿西替尼(HR 0.68,95% CI 0.48-0.97)和pembrolizumab联合来伐替尼(HR 0.61,95% CI 0.4-0.94)可改善OS。与舒尼替尼相比,Pembrolizumab联合来伐替尼、nivolumab联合卡博替尼、Pembrolizumab联合阿西替尼以及卡博替尼单药的PFS均有所改善。其中,pembrolizumab联合来伐替尼的PFS优于pembrolizumab联合阿西替尼(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.37-0.91),但与nivolumab联合卡博替尼(HR 0.63,95% CI 0.39-1.03)和卡博替尼单药(HR 0.84,95% CI 0.40-1.77)相比,PFS无差异。网络排名显示,pembrolizumab联合来伐替尼给老年患者带来的OS和PFS获益更多:结论:在老年人群中,需要考虑将ICB与TKI(如pembrolizumab加仑伐替尼)联合治疗,而不是单药治疗,但有必要使用真实世界数据或前瞻性试验进行进一步验证,以确认晚期RCC老年患者一线治疗方案的有效性和安全性。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions.
The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.