Facilitators and Barriers to Speech Intervention of Patients with Orofacial Cleft in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Seminars in Speech and Language Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1764432
Kerwyn Jim C Chan, Larissa Christia F Adique, Kathy B Reyes-Brander, Steven Angelo J Maristela, Ken Kristoffer A Tort
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Speech Intervention of Patients with Orofacial Cleft in the Philippines: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Kerwyn Jim C Chan,&nbsp;Larissa Christia F Adique,&nbsp;Kathy B Reyes-Brander,&nbsp;Steven Angelo J Maristela,&nbsp;Ken Kristoffer A Tort","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most individuals with orofacial cleft require various healthcare services, including speech therapy. However, Filipino patients constantly face challenges in availing these services due to limitations in the healthcare system of the Philippines. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients with orofacial cleft on the factors that may serve as facilitators and barriers to speech intervention. A descriptive phenomenological approach to qualitative research was used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the perceptions of these patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted through online video conferences or mobile phone calls. Twenty-one participants were interviewed, most of who were mothers (90%) of children with orofacial cleft. Ten themes were derived from the transcripts. Five were categorized as facilitators, while the rest were considered as barriers. Generally, the respondents showed positive attitudes toward orofacial cleft, were aware of the communication and swallowing issues of the patients, and actively sought services to address these issues. Most barriers to speech intervention resulted from limited access to quality healthcare services and information. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient perspectives in clinical care. Maximizing facilitators and addressing barriers may improve access to universal healthcare among Filipinos with orofacial cleft.</p>","PeriodicalId":48772,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech and Language","volume":"44 3","pages":"155-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech and Language","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most individuals with orofacial cleft require various healthcare services, including speech therapy. However, Filipino patients constantly face challenges in availing these services due to limitations in the healthcare system of the Philippines. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of patients with orofacial cleft on the factors that may serve as facilitators and barriers to speech intervention. A descriptive phenomenological approach to qualitative research was used to obtain an in-depth understanding of the perceptions of these patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted through online video conferences or mobile phone calls. Twenty-one participants were interviewed, most of who were mothers (90%) of children with orofacial cleft. Ten themes were derived from the transcripts. Five were categorized as facilitators, while the rest were considered as barriers. Generally, the respondents showed positive attitudes toward orofacial cleft, were aware of the communication and swallowing issues of the patients, and actively sought services to address these issues. Most barriers to speech intervention resulted from limited access to quality healthcare services and information. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient perspectives in clinical care. Maximizing facilitators and addressing barriers may improve access to universal healthcare among Filipinos with orofacial cleft.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾唇腭裂患者言语干预的促进因素与障碍:一项质性研究。
大多数唇腭裂患者需要各种保健服务,包括语言治疗。然而,由于菲律宾医疗保健系统的限制,菲律宾患者在利用这些服务时不断面临挑战。本研究旨在探讨唇腭裂患者对言语干预的促进因素和障碍因素的认知。定性研究采用描述性现象学方法,以深入了解这些患者的看法。半结构化访谈是通过在线视频会议或移动电话进行的。21名参与者接受了采访,其中大多数是患有唇腭裂儿童的母亲(90%)。从抄本中衍生出十个主题。5个被归类为促进者,其余被视为障碍。总体而言,受访者对腭裂表现出积极的态度,意识到患者的沟通和吞咽问题,并积极寻求解决这些问题的服务。言语干预的大多数障碍是由于获得优质医疗保健服务和信息的机会有限。这些发现强调了在临床护理中考虑患者观点的重要性。最大限度地促进和解决障碍可能会改善获得普遍医疗保健的菲律宾唇腭裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Speech and Language
Seminars in Speech and Language AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Seminars in Speech and Language is a topic driven review journal that covers the entire spectrum of speech language pathology. In each issue, a leading specialist covers diagnostic procedures, screening and assessment techniques, treatment protocols, as well as short and long-term management practices in areas such as apraxia, communication, stuttering, autism, dysphagia, attention, phonological intervention, memory as well as other disorders.
期刊最新文献
Adjustable Phonatory PEEP to Treat Dysphonia: A Preliminary Investigation of Progressive Masked Voice Exercises (PMVE). The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Caregiver Facilitation of Home Practice. Examining an Explicit Phonological Awareness Intervention: The Impact on First Sound Fluency in Young Children. Spurring Innovation in AAC Technology through Collaborative Dreaming and Needs Finding with Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Who Use AAC. Developing Participatory Methods to Include Young Children's Voices in Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1