Identification and Incidence of Child Maltreatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychology Public Policy and Law Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1037/law0000352
Stacy Metcalf, J Alex Marlow, Corey J Rood, Mark A Hilado, Catherine A DeRidder, Jodi A Quas
{"title":"Identification and Incidence of Child Maltreatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Stacy Metcalf, J Alex Marlow, Corey J Rood, Mark A Hilado, Catherine A DeRidder, Jodi A Quas","doi":"10.1037/law0000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised serious concerns about child maltreatment, which is known to increase in frequency and severity during times of high stress. The present study used diverse datasets to concurrently examine changes in identification and medical evaluation of maltreatment allegations from before to during COVID-19. Four sources of data were collected from two counties for the months of March-December in 2019 and 2020, including reports to social services and child maltreatment evaluation clinic medical evaluations (CMECs). The number of reports, number of children reported, and rate of children reported were used to evaluate identification. Incidence was estimated based on the number of medical evaluations conducted at the CMECs. Maltreatment type, reporter type, and child demographics were also considered. Across both counties, there were significantly fewer reports and reported children in 2020 compared to 2019, signifying decreased identification of suspected maltreatment cases. This was especially true in spring and fall when children are typically in school. Across both counties, the proportion of children reported to the county that received medical evaluations was higher in 2020 compared to 2019. This suggests that the pandemic was related to an increase in the occurrence maltreatment serious enough to warrant medical evaluations, or perhaps in the relative number of serious cases identified. Findings show divergent trends in reporting and evaluation of suspected maltreatment cases from before to during COVID-19. Identification and service delivery methods need creative solutions to adapt to changing environments. Medical, social, and legal systems need to prepare for increases in families seeking services as pandemic-related restrictions are lifted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51463,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195111/pdf/nihms-1888370.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Public Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised serious concerns about child maltreatment, which is known to increase in frequency and severity during times of high stress. The present study used diverse datasets to concurrently examine changes in identification and medical evaluation of maltreatment allegations from before to during COVID-19. Four sources of data were collected from two counties for the months of March-December in 2019 and 2020, including reports to social services and child maltreatment evaluation clinic medical evaluations (CMECs). The number of reports, number of children reported, and rate of children reported were used to evaluate identification. Incidence was estimated based on the number of medical evaluations conducted at the CMECs. Maltreatment type, reporter type, and child demographics were also considered. Across both counties, there were significantly fewer reports and reported children in 2020 compared to 2019, signifying decreased identification of suspected maltreatment cases. This was especially true in spring and fall when children are typically in school. Across both counties, the proportion of children reported to the county that received medical evaluations was higher in 2020 compared to 2019. This suggests that the pandemic was related to an increase in the occurrence maltreatment serious enough to warrant medical evaluations, or perhaps in the relative number of serious cases identified. Findings show divergent trends in reporting and evaluation of suspected maltreatment cases from before to during COVID-19. Identification and service delivery methods need creative solutions to adapt to changing environments. Medical, social, and legal systems need to prepare for increases in families seeking services as pandemic-related restrictions are lifted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间儿童虐待的识别和发生率。
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引起了人们对虐待儿童问题的严重关注,众所周知,在高度紧张时期,虐待儿童的频率和严重程度都会增加。本研究利用不同的数据集,同时研究了从 COVID-19 之前到期间虐待指控的识别和医疗评估方面的变化。本研究从两个县收集了 2019 年和 2020 年 3 月至 12 月期间的四种数据来源,包括向社会服务部门提交的报告和儿童虐待评估诊所的医疗评估(CMEC)。报告数量、报告的儿童数量和报告的儿童比率被用来评估鉴定结果。发生率根据在 CMEC 进行的医疗评估数量进行估算。此外,还考虑了虐待类型、报告者类型和儿童人口统计学特征。与 2019 年相比,两个县 2020 年的报告和被报告儿童人数明显减少,这表明疑似虐待案件的识别率有所下降。这种情况在春季和秋季尤为明显,因为此时儿童通常都在上学。在这两个县,2020 年向该县报告并接受医疗评估的儿童比例高于 2019 年。这表明,大流行与严重到需要进行医疗评估的虐待事件增加有关,或者可能与已确定的严重案例的相对数量增加有关。研究结果表明,从 COVID-19 之前到期间,疑似虐待病例的报告和评估趋势各不相同。识别和提供服务的方法需要创造性的解决方案,以适应不断变化的环境。医疗、社会和法律系统需要做好准备,以应对大流行相关限制解除后寻求服务的家庭增多的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law ® provides a forum in which to critically evaluate the contributions of psychology and related disciplines (hereinafter psychology) to public policy and legal issues, and vice versa. It is read by legal scholars and professionals and public policy analysts as well as psychology researchers and practitioners working at the interface of the three fields. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical articles that critically evaluate the contributions and potential contributions of psychology to public policy and legal issues;assess the desirability of different public policy and legal alternatives in light of the scientific knowledge base in psychology;articulate research needs that address public policy and legal issues for which there is currently insufficient theoretical and empirical knowledge;present empirical work that makes a significant contribution to the application of psychological knowledge to public policy or the law; andexamine public policy and legal issues relating to the conduct of psychology and related disciplines (e.g., human subjects, protection policies; informed consent procedures).
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Factors Contributing to the Delayed Submission of Competence to Stand Trial Reports and the Jail-Based Competency Crisis in Washington Factors contributing to the delayed submission of competence to stand trial reports and the jail-based competency crisis in Washington. Crowd reactions to the police use of force at the 2017 Phoenix Trump rally. Supplemental Material for Adult Male Rape Myths in England Since 1994: A Systemic Mixed Methods Review Deaf community experiences in the Canadian justice system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1