Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000097
Theresa M Albers, Kenneth S Henderson, Guy B Mulder, William R Shek
{"title":"Pathogen Prevalence Estimates and Diagnostic Methodology Trends in Laboratory Mice and Rats from 2003 to 2020.","authors":"Theresa M Albers, Kenneth S Henderson, Guy B Mulder, William R Shek","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rodents used in biomedical research are maintained as specific pathogen-free (SPF) by employing biosecurity measures that eliminate and exclude adventitious infectious agents known to confound research. The efficacy of these practices is assessed by routine laboratory testing referred to as health monitoring (HM). This study summarizes the results of HM performed at Charles River Research Animal Diagnostic Services (CR-RADS) on samples submitted by external (non-Charles River) clients between 2003 and 2020. Summarizing this vast amount of data has been made practicable by the recent introduction of end-user business intelligence tools to Excel. HM summaries include the number of samples tested and the percent positive by diagnostic methodology, including direct examination for parasites, cultural isolation and identification for bacteria, serology for antibodies to viruses and fastidious microorganisms, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for pathogen-specific genomic sequences. Consistent with comparable studies, the percentages of pathogen-positive samples by diagnostic methodology and year interval are referred to as period prevalence estimates (%P<sub>E</sub>). These %P<sub>E</sub> substantiate the elimination of once common respiratory pathogens, such as Sendai virus, and reductions in the prevalence of other agents considered common, such as the rodent coronaviruses and parvoviruses. Conversely, the %P<sub>E</sub> of certain pathogens, for example, murine norovirus (MNV), <i>Helicobacter</i>, <i>Rodentibacter</i>, and parasites remain high, perhaps due to the increasing exchange of genetically engineered mutant (GEM) rodents among researchers and the challenges and high cost of eliminating these agents from rodent housing facilities. Study results also document the growing role of PCR in HM because of its applicability to all pathogen types and its high specificity and sensitivity; moreover, PCR can detect pathogens in samples collected antemortem directly from colony animals and from the environment, thereby improving the detection of host-adapted, environmentally unstable pathogens that are not efficiently transmitted to sentinels by soiled bedding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rodents used in biomedical research are maintained as specific pathogen-free (SPF) by employing biosecurity measures that eliminate and exclude adventitious infectious agents known to confound research. The efficacy of these practices is assessed by routine laboratory testing referred to as health monitoring (HM). This study summarizes the results of HM performed at Charles River Research Animal Diagnostic Services (CR-RADS) on samples submitted by external (non-Charles River) clients between 2003 and 2020. Summarizing this vast amount of data has been made practicable by the recent introduction of end-user business intelligence tools to Excel. HM summaries include the number of samples tested and the percent positive by diagnostic methodology, including direct examination for parasites, cultural isolation and identification for bacteria, serology for antibodies to viruses and fastidious microorganisms, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for pathogen-specific genomic sequences. Consistent with comparable studies, the percentages of pathogen-positive samples by diagnostic methodology and year interval are referred to as period prevalence estimates (%PE). These %PE substantiate the elimination of once common respiratory pathogens, such as Sendai virus, and reductions in the prevalence of other agents considered common, such as the rodent coronaviruses and parvoviruses. Conversely, the %PE of certain pathogens, for example, murine norovirus (MNV), Helicobacter, Rodentibacter, and parasites remain high, perhaps due to the increasing exchange of genetically engineered mutant (GEM) rodents among researchers and the challenges and high cost of eliminating these agents from rodent housing facilities. Study results also document the growing role of PCR in HM because of its applicability to all pathogen types and its high specificity and sensitivity; moreover, PCR can detect pathogens in samples collected antemortem directly from colony animals and from the environment, thereby improving the detection of host-adapted, environmentally unstable pathogens that are not efficiently transmitted to sentinels by soiled bedding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2003年至2020年实验室小鼠和大鼠的病原体流行率估计和诊断方法趋势。
生物医学研究中使用的啮齿动物通过采用生物安全措施来消除和排除已知会混淆研究的外来传染源,从而保持无特定病原体(SPF)。这些做法的疗效是通过被称为健康监测(HM)的常规实验室测试来评估的。本研究总结了查尔斯河研究动物诊断服务中心(CR-RADS)在2003年至2020年间对外部(非查尔斯河)客户提交的样本进行HM的结果。由于最近在Excel中引入了最终用户商业智能工具,总结大量数据变得切实可行。HM摘要包括通过诊断方法检测的样本数量和阳性率,包括寄生虫的直接检查、细菌的培养分离和鉴定、病毒和挑剔微生物抗体的血清学,以及病原体特异性基因组序列的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)测定。与可比研究一致,通过诊断方法和年份间隔得出的病原体阳性样本的百分比被称为时期流行率估计值(%PE)。这些%PE证实了仙台病毒等曾经常见的呼吸道病原体的消除,以及啮齿动物冠状病毒和细小病毒等其他常见病原体的流行率的降低。相反,某些病原体的%PE仍然很高,例如鼠诺如病毒(MNV)、幽门螺杆菌、啮齿类杆菌和寄生虫,这可能是由于研究人员之间基因工程突变(GEM)啮齿动物的交换不断增加,以及从啮齿动物饲养设施中消除这些病原体的挑战和高昂成本。研究结果还记录了PCR在HM中日益增长的作用,因为它适用于所有病原体类型,并且具有高度的特异性和敏感性;此外,PCR可以检测直接从群体动物和环境中采集的尸检样本中的病原体,从而提高对宿主适应的、环境不稳定的病原体的检测,这些病原体不能通过脏床上用品有效地传播给哨兵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intranasal Administration of Polymeric Biodegradable Films in C57bl/6 Mice. Comparison of Systemic Extended-release Buprenorphine and Local Extended-release Bupivacaine-Meloxicam as Analgesics for Laparotomy in Mice. Equipment and Methods for Concurrently Housing Germfree and Gnotobiotic Mice in the Same Room. Evaluation of Rodent Diet Stability when Stored in Conditions that Diverge from Guide Parameters. Behavioral Evaluation of Laboratory-housed Ferrets (Mustela Putorius Furo) in Different Enclosure Sizes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1