Quantification and statistical modeling of droplet-based single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data.

IF 1.8 3区 数学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Biostatistics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxad010
Albert Kuo, Kasper D Hansen, Stephanie C Hicks
{"title":"Quantification and statistical modeling of droplet-based single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data.","authors":"Albert Kuo, Kasper D Hansen, Stephanie C Hicks","doi":"10.1093/biostatistics/kxad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In complex tissues containing cells that are difficult to dissociate, single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) has become the preferred experimental technology over single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) to measure gene expression. To accurately model these data in downstream analyses, previous work has shown that droplet-based scRNA-seq data are not zero-inflated, but whether droplet-based snRNA-seq data follow the same probability distributions has not been systematically evaluated. Using pseudonegative control data from nuclei in mouse cortex sequenced with the 10x Genomics Chromium system and mouse kidney sequenced with the DropSeq system, we found that droplet-based snRNA-seq data follow a negative binomial distribution, suggesting that parametric statistical models applied to scRNA-seq are transferable to snRNA-seq. Furthermore, we found that the quantification choices in adapting quantification mapping strategies from scRNA-seq to snRNA-seq can play a significant role in downstream analyses and biological interpretation. In particular, reference transcriptomes that do not include intronic regions result in significantly smaller library sizes and incongruous cell type classifications. We also confirmed the presence of a gene length bias in snRNA-seq data, which we show is present in both exonic and intronic reads, and investigate potential causes for the bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":55357,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics","volume":" ","pages":"801-817"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxad010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In complex tissues containing cells that are difficult to dissociate, single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) has become the preferred experimental technology over single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) to measure gene expression. To accurately model these data in downstream analyses, previous work has shown that droplet-based scRNA-seq data are not zero-inflated, but whether droplet-based snRNA-seq data follow the same probability distributions has not been systematically evaluated. Using pseudonegative control data from nuclei in mouse cortex sequenced with the 10x Genomics Chromium system and mouse kidney sequenced with the DropSeq system, we found that droplet-based snRNA-seq data follow a negative binomial distribution, suggesting that parametric statistical models applied to scRNA-seq are transferable to snRNA-seq. Furthermore, we found that the quantification choices in adapting quantification mapping strategies from scRNA-seq to snRNA-seq can play a significant role in downstream analyses and biological interpretation. In particular, reference transcriptomes that do not include intronic regions result in significantly smaller library sizes and incongruous cell type classifications. We also confirmed the presence of a gene length bias in snRNA-seq data, which we show is present in both exonic and intronic reads, and investigate potential causes for the bias.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于液滴的单核rna测序数据的量化和统计建模。
在含有难以解离的细胞的复杂组织中,单核rna测序(snRNA-seq)已成为比单细胞rna测序(scRNA-seq)更好的测量基因表达的实验技术。为了在下游分析中准确地模拟这些数据,之前的工作表明,基于液滴的snRNA-seq数据不是零膨胀的,但基于液滴的snRNA-seq数据是否遵循相同的概率分布尚未得到系统评估。利用10x Genomics Chromium系统对小鼠皮质核和DropSeq系统对小鼠肾脏核的假阴性对照数据,我们发现基于液滴的snRNA-seq数据遵循负二项分布,这表明用于scRNA-seq的参数统计模型可转移到snRNA-seq中。此外,我们发现将定量定位策略从scRNA-seq调整为snRNA-seq的定量选择可以在下游分析和生物学解释中发挥重要作用。特别是,不包括内含子区域的参考转录组导致文库大小明显较小和细胞类型分类不一致。我们还证实了snRNA-seq数据中存在基因长度偏差,我们发现这种偏差存在于外显子和内含子读取中,并调查了这种偏差的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biostatistics
Biostatistics 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Among the important scientific developments of the 20th century is the explosive growth in statistical reasoning and methods for application to studies of human health. Examples include developments in likelihood methods for inference, epidemiologic statistics, clinical trials, survival analysis, and statistical genetics. Substantive problems in public health and biomedical research have fueled the development of statistical methods, which in turn have improved our ability to draw valid inferences from data. The objective of Biostatistics is to advance statistical science and its application to problems of human health and disease, with the ultimate goal of advancing the public''s health.
期刊最新文献
A semiparametric Gaussian mixture model for chest CT-based 3D blood vessel reconstruction. Simultaneous clustering and estimation of networks in multiple graphical models. A joint normal-ordinal (probit) model for ordinal and continuous longitudinal data. A modeling framework for detecting and leveraging node-level information in Bayesian network inference. A marginal structural model for normal tissue complication probability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1