Personalized definition of surgical targets in major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A potential role for low-intensity focused ultrasound?

Salvador M. Guinjoan
{"title":"Personalized definition of surgical targets in major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A potential role for low-intensity focused ultrasound?","authors":"Salvador M. Guinjoan","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2023.100100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) are common and potentially incapacitating conditions. Even when recognized and adequately treated, in over a third of patients with these conditions the response to first-line pharmacological and psychotherapeutic measures is not satisfactory. After more assertive measures including pharmacological augmentation (and in the case of depression, </span>transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, or treatment with </span>ketamine<span><span> or esketamine), a significant number of individuals remain severely symptomatic. In these persons, different ablation and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) psychosurgical techniques have been employed. However, apart from the cost and potential morbidity associated with surgery, on average only about half of patients show adequate response, which limits the widespread application of these potentially life-saving interventions. Possible reasons are considered for the wide variation in outcomes across different series of patients with MDD or OCD exposed to ablative or DBS psychosurgery, including interindividual anatomical and etiological variability. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is an emerging technique that holds promise in its ability to achieve anatomically circumscribed, noninvasive, and reversible </span>neuromodulation of deep brain structures. A possible role for LIFU in the personalized presurgical definition of neuromodulation targets in the individual patient is discussed, including a proposed roadmap for </span></span>clinical trials addressed at testing whether this technique can help to improve psychosurgical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10034711/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171723000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) are common and potentially incapacitating conditions. Even when recognized and adequately treated, in over a third of patients with these conditions the response to first-line pharmacological and psychotherapeutic measures is not satisfactory. After more assertive measures including pharmacological augmentation (and in the case of depression, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, or treatment with ketamine or esketamine), a significant number of individuals remain severely symptomatic. In these persons, different ablation and deep-brain stimulation (DBS) psychosurgical techniques have been employed. However, apart from the cost and potential morbidity associated with surgery, on average only about half of patients show adequate response, which limits the widespread application of these potentially life-saving interventions. Possible reasons are considered for the wide variation in outcomes across different series of patients with MDD or OCD exposed to ablative or DBS psychosurgery, including interindividual anatomical and etiological variability. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is an emerging technique that holds promise in its ability to achieve anatomically circumscribed, noninvasive, and reversible neuromodulation of deep brain structures. A possible role for LIFU in the personalized presurgical definition of neuromodulation targets in the individual patient is discussed, including a proposed roadmap for clinical trials addressed at testing whether this technique can help to improve psychosurgical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度抑郁症和强迫症手术靶点的个性化定义:低强度聚焦超声的潜在作用?
严重抑郁障碍(MDD)和强迫症(OCD)是常见的,可能会使人丧失能力。即使得到了认可和充分治疗,超过三分之一的患者对一线药物和心理治疗措施的反应也不令人满意。在采取更果断的措施,包括药物强化(在抑郁症、经颅磁刺激、电休克治疗或氯胺酮或爱斯基摩胺治疗的情况下)后,相当多的人仍然有严重症状。在这些人身上,采用了不同的消融和深部脑刺激(DBS)心理外科技术。然而,除了与手术相关的成本和潜在发病率外,平均只有大约一半的患者表现出足够的反应,这限制了这些可能挽救生命的干预措施的广泛应用。暴露于消融或DBS精神外科手术的不同系列MDD或OCD患者的结果差异很大,可能的原因包括个体间的解剖和病因变异性。低强度聚焦超声(LIFU)是一种新兴的技术,它有望实现大脑深层结构的解剖学限制、无创和可逆的神经调控。讨论了LIFU在个体患者神经调控靶点的个性化术前定义中的可能作用,包括为测试该技术是否有助于改善心理外科结果而提出的临床试验路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1