Short Term Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy in Acute Depressive Episodes of Bipolar II Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q3 Medicine Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2022-05-31
Jin Hong Park, Nicolas A Nuñez, Manuel Gardea-Resendez, Danielle J Gerberi, Scott Breitinger, Marin Veldic, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh
{"title":"Short Term Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy in Acute Depressive Episodes of Bipolar II Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jin Hong Park,&nbsp;Nicolas A Nuñez,&nbsp;Manuel Gardea-Resendez,&nbsp;Danielle J Gerberi,&nbsp;Scott Breitinger,&nbsp;Marin Veldic,&nbsp;Mark A Frye,&nbsp;Balwinder Singh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) has limited evidence-based treatment guidelines. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the efficacy and safety of second-generation antidepressant (SGAD) monotherapy in acute BD-II depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted from the database inception through March 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Outcome measures included: response rates, treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS) rates, discontinuation due to side-effects, and all-cause discontinuation. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3301 studies were screened, and 15 articles were selected for full-text review. Five studies met the inclusion criteria: Four double-blind RCTs (n = 533) and one open-label RCT (n = 83) were included. Two double-blind RCTs [n = 223, SGAD = 110 (venlafaxine = 65, sertraline = 45), lithium/control = 113] were included for meta-analysis. The response rate for SGAD monotherapy compared to lithium monotherapy were similar (RR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.78, 2.66). The TEAS rate for SGAD monotherapy was not significantly different from lithium monotherapy (p = 0.76). The discontinuation rate due to side-effects for SGAD monotherapy was significantly lower than lithium monotherapy with a RR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.96, p = 0.04 but all-cause discontinuation rates were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limited data suggests short-term efficacy of venlafaxine and sertraline monotherapy in patients with acute BD-II depression with good side effect tolerability and without significantly increased switch rate. There is an urgent need for RCTs investigating the role of SGAD monotherapy in short and long-term among patients with BD-II.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"52 2","pages":"45-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172552/pdf/PB-52-2-45.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) has limited evidence-based treatment guidelines. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the efficacy and safety of second-generation antidepressant (SGAD) monotherapy in acute BD-II depression.

Methods: A literature search was conducted from the database inception through March 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Outcome measures included: response rates, treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS) rates, discontinuation due to side-effects, and all-cause discontinuation. Risk ratio (RR) was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects model.

Results: 3301 studies were screened, and 15 articles were selected for full-text review. Five studies met the inclusion criteria: Four double-blind RCTs (n = 533) and one open-label RCT (n = 83) were included. Two double-blind RCTs [n = 223, SGAD = 110 (venlafaxine = 65, sertraline = 45), lithium/control = 113] were included for meta-analysis. The response rate for SGAD monotherapy compared to lithium monotherapy were similar (RR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.78, 2.66). The TEAS rate for SGAD monotherapy was not significantly different from lithium monotherapy (p = 0.76). The discontinuation rate due to side-effects for SGAD monotherapy was significantly lower than lithium monotherapy with a RR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.96, p = 0.04 but all-cause discontinuation rates were similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Limited data suggests short-term efficacy of venlafaxine and sertraline monotherapy in patients with acute BD-II depression with good side effect tolerability and without significantly increased switch rate. There is an urgent need for RCTs investigating the role of SGAD monotherapy in short and long-term among patients with BD-II.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期第二代抗抑郁单药治疗双相II型障碍急性抑郁发作:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:双相情感障碍(BD-II)有有限的循证治疗指南。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估第二代抗抑郁药(SGAD)单药治疗急性BD-II型抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法:从数据库建立到2021年3月进行文献检索。仅纳入随机对照试验(rct)。结果测量包括:反应率、治疗产生的情感转换(TEAS)率、因副作用而停药和全因停药。风险比(RR)采用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型计算。结果:共筛选3301项研究,选取15篇文章进行全文综述。5项研究符合纳入标准:包括4项双盲RCT (n = 533)和1项开放标签RCT (n = 83)。纳入两项双盲rct [n = 223, SGAD = 110(文拉法辛= 65,瑟曲林= 45),锂/对照= 113]进行meta分析。SGAD单药治疗与锂单药治疗的有效率相似(RR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.78, 2.66)。SGAD单药治疗的tea率与锂单药治疗无显著差异(p = 0.76)。SGAD单药治疗的副作用停药率显著低于锂单药治疗,RR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.96, p = 0.04,但两组的全因停药率相似。结论:有限的数据表明文拉法辛和舍曲林单药治疗急性BD-II型抑郁症的短期疗效良好,副作用耐受性好,转换率无明显增加。迫切需要随机对照试验来研究SGAD单药治疗在BD-II患者中短期和长期的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Related to Duloxetine-Atomoxetine Combination in an Adolescent with ADHD and Comorbid GAD. On the Origins of MAOI Misconceptions: Reaffirming their Role in Melancholic Depression. Alzheimer's and Dementia Guidelines and Tables. Captagone & Morbid Jealousy. Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to Early Cognitive Change in Parkinson's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1