A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical lung cancer Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.12.002
Aamna Akhtar , Ernesto Sosa , Samuel Castro , Melissa Sur , Vanessa Lozano , Gail D'Souza , Sophia Yeung , Jonjon Macalintal , Meghna Patel , Xiaoke Zou , Pei-chi Wu , Ellen Silver , Jossie Sandoval , Stacy W. Gray , Karen L. Reckamp , Jae Y. Kim , Virginia Sun , Dan J. Raz , Loretta Erhunmwunsee
{"title":"A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers","authors":"Aamna Akhtar ,&nbsp;Ernesto Sosa ,&nbsp;Samuel Castro ,&nbsp;Melissa Sur ,&nbsp;Vanessa Lozano ,&nbsp;Gail D'Souza ,&nbsp;Sophia Yeung ,&nbsp;Jonjon Macalintal ,&nbsp;Meghna Patel ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Zou ,&nbsp;Pei-chi Wu ,&nbsp;Ellen Silver ,&nbsp;Jossie Sandoval ,&nbsp;Stacy W. Gray ,&nbsp;Karen L. Reckamp ,&nbsp;Jae Y. Kim ,&nbsp;Virginia Sun ,&nbsp;Dan J. Raz ,&nbsp;Loretta Erhunmwunsee","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2021.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) serve minority and low-socioeconomic populations and provide care to high-risk smokers. These centers frequently experience barriers, including low provider and medical assistant (MA) knowledge around lung cancer screening (LCS). Subsequent low LCS referral rates by providers at FQHCs limit utilization of LCS in eligible, high-risk, underserved patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Providers and MAs from two FQHCs participated in a LCS educational session. A pre-educational survey was administered at the start of the session and a post-educational survey at the end. The intervention included a presentation with education around non-small cell lung cancer, LCS, tobacco cessation, and shared-decision making. Both surveys were used to evaluate changes in provider and MA ability to determine eligible patients for LCS. The Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction was used to measure the impact.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 29 providers and 28 MAs enrolled in the study from two FQHCs. There was an improvement, <em>P</em> &lt; .009 and <em>P</em> &lt; .015 respectively, in provider and MA confidence in identifying patients for LCS. Additionally, one year prior to the program, 9 low-dose computed tomography (LDCTs) were ordered at one of the FQHCs and 0 at the other. After the program, over 100 LDCTs were ordered at each FQHC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A targeted LCS educational program improves provider and MAs’ ability to identify eligible LCS patients and is associated with an increase in the number of patients referred to LDCT at FQHCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 356-363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9149065/pdf/nihms-1768575.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730421002898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) serve minority and low-socioeconomic populations and provide care to high-risk smokers. These centers frequently experience barriers, including low provider and medical assistant (MA) knowledge around lung cancer screening (LCS). Subsequent low LCS referral rates by providers at FQHCs limit utilization of LCS in eligible, high-risk, underserved patients.

Methods

Providers and MAs from two FQHCs participated in a LCS educational session. A pre-educational survey was administered at the start of the session and a post-educational survey at the end. The intervention included a presentation with education around non-small cell lung cancer, LCS, tobacco cessation, and shared-decision making. Both surveys were used to evaluate changes in provider and MA ability to determine eligible patients for LCS. The Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction was used to measure the impact.

Results

A total of 29 providers and 28 MAs enrolled in the study from two FQHCs. There was an improvement, P < .009 and P < .015 respectively, in provider and MA confidence in identifying patients for LCS. Additionally, one year prior to the program, 9 low-dose computed tomography (LDCTs) were ordered at one of the FQHCs and 0 at the other. After the program, over 100 LDCTs were ordered at each FQHC.

Conclusions

A targeted LCS educational program improves provider and MAs’ ability to identify eligible LCS patients and is associated with an increase in the number of patients referred to LDCT at FQHCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌筛查教育项目对两家联邦合格医疗中心的转诊率、提供者和医疗助理知识的影响
联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)服务于少数民族和低社会经济人群,并为高危吸烟者提供护理。这些中心经常遇到障碍,包括关于肺癌筛查(LCS)的低提供者和医疗助理(MA)知识。随后fqhc的低LCS转诊率限制了LCS在符合条件、高风险、服务不足患者中的应用。方法两家fqhc的提供者和MAs参加LCS教育会议。一项教育前调查在会议开始时进行,一项教育后调查在会议结束时进行。干预包括介绍关于非小细胞肺癌、LCS、戒烟和共同决策的教育。这两项调查都用于评估提供者和MA确定LCS合格患者的能力的变化。采用Pearson's卡方检验和Yates'连续性校正来测量影响。结果共有来自两家fqhc的29名提供者和28名MAs入组研究。有一个改进,P <.009和P <在确定LCS患者的提供者和MA信心方面分别为0.015。此外,在该计划的一年前,在一个fqhc处订购了9次低剂量计算机断层扫描(ldct),在另一个处订购了0次。项目结束后,每个FQHC订购了100多台ldct。结论:有针对性的LCS教育计划提高了提供者和MAs识别合格LCS患者的能力,并与fqhc转介到LDCT的患者数量增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Longitudinal Analysis of Recurrence and Risk Factors of Early-Stage Resected Adenocarcinoma With Common EGFR Mutations: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study in South Korea. First-Line Pembrolizumab Efficacy in Octogenarians With NSCLCs Expressing ≥ 50% PD-L1 (ESCKEYP GFPC 05-2018). The Role of GLP-1 Agonists in Mitigating Lorlatinib-Induced Metabolic Syndrome: Two Case Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1