Comparison of Pediatric Dentistry Under General Anesthesia in a Surgery Center vs a Hospital.

Q3 Medicine Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2344/anpr-69-02-07
Peter Douglas, Barbara Sheller, Travis Nelson, Elizabeth Velan, JoAnna M Scott
{"title":"Comparison of Pediatric Dentistry Under General Anesthesia in a Surgery Center vs a Hospital.","authors":"Peter Douglas,&nbsp;Barbara Sheller,&nbsp;Travis Nelson,&nbsp;Elizabeth Velan,&nbsp;JoAnna M Scott","doi":"10.2344/anpr-69-02-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatric patients who undergo general anesthesia (GA) for dentistry may be treated in different venues. This retrospective study compared patients treated in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) to those treated in a hospital operating room (H-OR). The 2-venue model was also compared with a historical hospital-only model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve months of data were collected via records review: patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and medical comorbidities. Data from patients treated at the H-OR 10 years prior were referenced for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 2017 and June 2018, 1148 patients were treated: 635 at the ASC and 513 at the H-OR. The most common age range for both venues was 3 to 8 years. Of all the ASC patients, 78% were ASA I, while 48% of H-OR patients were ASA III (P < .001). The number of patients treated with the 2-venue model represented a 240% annual increase compared with those treated historically using the hospital-only model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of differences in patient medical comorbidities, both the ASC and H-OR are needed to adequately address the needs of pediatric dental patients who require GA. Treating healthy patients in an ASC also creates increased capacity in the H-OR to better accommodate those with higher medical acuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"69 4","pages":"3-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773414/pdf/i1878-7177-69-4-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-69-02-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pediatric patients who undergo general anesthesia (GA) for dentistry may be treated in different venues. This retrospective study compared patients treated in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) to those treated in a hospital operating room (H-OR). The 2-venue model was also compared with a historical hospital-only model.

Methods: Twelve months of data were collected via records review: patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and medical comorbidities. Data from patients treated at the H-OR 10 years prior were referenced for comparison.

Results: Between July 2017 and June 2018, 1148 patients were treated: 635 at the ASC and 513 at the H-OR. The most common age range for both venues was 3 to 8 years. Of all the ASC patients, 78% were ASA I, while 48% of H-OR patients were ASA III (P < .001). The number of patients treated with the 2-venue model represented a 240% annual increase compared with those treated historically using the hospital-only model.

Conclusion: Because of differences in patient medical comorbidities, both the ASC and H-OR are needed to adequately address the needs of pediatric dental patients who require GA. Treating healthy patients in an ASC also creates increased capacity in the H-OR to better accommodate those with higher medical acuity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科中心与医院小儿牙科全麻比较
目的:小儿牙科全麻(GA)患者可在不同场所进行治疗。这项回顾性研究比较了在门诊手术中心(ASC)和在医院手术室(H-OR)治疗的患者。并将2个场地的模型与历史上仅医院的模型进行了比较。方法:通过记录回顾收集12个月的数据:患者人口统计、美国麻醉学会(ASA)分类和医疗合并症。参考10年前在H-OR接受治疗的患者的数据进行比较。结果:2017年7月至2018年6月期间,1148例患者接受了治疗:635例在ASC, 513例在H-OR。两个场地最常见的年龄范围是3至8岁。在所有ASC患者中,78%为ASA I,而H-OR患者中48%为ASA III (P < 0.001)。与以往仅使用医院模式治疗的患者相比,采用双中心模式治疗的患者数量每年增加240%。结论:由于患者合并症的差异,需要ASC和H-OR来充分满足需要GA的儿童牙科患者的需求。在ASC中治疗健康患者也增加了H-OR的容量,以更好地容纳那些具有更高医疗敏锐度的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Sedation Levels Using SedLine During Intravenous Sedation for Dental Procedures: A Case-Series Study. Cardiac Arrest Due to Pacing Failure From Pilsicainide Poisoning. A New Dental Specialty in Canada. Literature Review for Office-Based Anesthesia. Hypotension Without Skin Symptoms at Local Anesthesia in Dental Treatment: Anaphylaxis? Or Vasovagal Reaction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1