"Ten dollars today or 50 dollars after one month?" Temporal discounting in Korsakoff syndrome.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2023.2173059
Mohamad El Haj, Ahmed A Moustafa
{"title":"\"Ten dollars today or 50 dollars after one month?\" Temporal discounting in Korsakoff syndrome.","authors":"Mohamad El Haj,&nbsp;Ahmed A Moustafa","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2023.2173059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Little research has investigated decision making in patients with Korsakoff syndrome (KS). Specifically, to our knowledge, there is a lack of research investigating whether patients with KS may tend to prefer immediate over future rewards (i.e., temporal discounting). Further, we investigated the relationship between temporal discounting and inhibition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We, for the first time, invited patients with KS and control participants to perform a temporal discounting task, in which they answered questions probing preferences between an immediate, but smaller amount of money, and a delayed, but larger amount of money (e.g., \"would you prefer 10 dollars today or 50 dollars after one month?\"). Furthermore, inhibition was measured using the Stroop Colour Word Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis demonstrated higher temporal discounting in patients with KS than in control participants. Temporal discounting in both populations was significantly correlated with inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with KS may have difficulties to suppress the temptation of smaller, but immediate, rewards.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"28 2","pages":"116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2023.2173059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Little research has investigated decision making in patients with Korsakoff syndrome (KS). Specifically, to our knowledge, there is a lack of research investigating whether patients with KS may tend to prefer immediate over future rewards (i.e., temporal discounting). Further, we investigated the relationship between temporal discounting and inhibition.

Methods: We, for the first time, invited patients with KS and control participants to perform a temporal discounting task, in which they answered questions probing preferences between an immediate, but smaller amount of money, and a delayed, but larger amount of money (e.g., "would you prefer 10 dollars today or 50 dollars after one month?"). Furthermore, inhibition was measured using the Stroop Colour Word Test.

Results: Analysis demonstrated higher temporal discounting in patients with KS than in control participants. Temporal discounting in both populations was significantly correlated with inhibition.

Conclusions: Patients with KS may have difficulties to suppress the temptation of smaller, but immediate, rewards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“今天10美元还是一个月后50美元?”Korsakoff综合征的时间折扣。
目的:研究Korsakoff综合征(KS)患者的决策问题。具体而言,据我们所知,缺乏关于KS患者是否倾向于选择即时奖励而非未来奖励(即时间折扣)的研究。进一步,我们研究了时间折扣和抑制之间的关系。方法:我们首次邀请患有KS的患者和对照组参与者执行一项时间折扣任务,在这项任务中,他们回答了一些问题,探讨了在立即得到但金额较小的钱和延迟得到但金额较大的钱之间的偏好(例如,“你喜欢今天得到10美元还是一个月后得到50美元?”)。此外,使用Stroop颜色单词测试来测量抑制作用。结果:分析表明,与对照组相比,KS患者的时间折扣更高。两个群体的时间折扣与抑制显著相关。结论:KS患者可能难以抑制较小但即时奖励的诱惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
期刊最新文献
How disrupted interoception could lead to disturbances in perceptual reality monitoring. Can neurocognitive performance account for dimensional paranoid ideation? Conspiracy mentality in autistic and non-autistic individuals Pattern glare sensitivity distinguishes subclinical autism and schizotypy. Limited awareness of hallucinations in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1