How different microfilters affect the recovery of eleven EU-regulated mycotoxins.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3693
Marija Kovač Tomas, Anto Mijatović, Mateja Bulaić Nevistić, Bojan Šarkanj, Jurislav Babić, Tihomir Kovač
{"title":"How different microfilters affect the recovery of eleven EU-regulated mycotoxins.","authors":"Marija Kovač Tomas,&nbsp;Anto Mijatović,&nbsp;Mateja Bulaić Nevistić,&nbsp;Bojan Šarkanj,&nbsp;Jurislav Babić,&nbsp;Tihomir Kovač","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microfiltration is a common step in liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS), a method of choice in determining several mycotoxins in a solution at once. However, microfiltration may entail filter-analyte interactions that can affect the accuracy of the procedure, and underestimate exposure. The aim of our study was to assess how five different membrane materials for syringe filters (nylon, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyethersulphone, mixed cellulose ester, and cellulose acetate) affect microfiltration and recovery of EU-regulated mycotoxins, including aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins B1 and B2, zearalenone, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, and ochratoxin A. Polytetrafluoroethylene filters turned out to least affect microfiltration through mycotoxin loss, followed by more commonly used nylon filters, whereas the remaining three filter membrane materials had such a negative effect on recoveries that we found them incompatible with the procedure. Our findings clearly suggest that it is important to select a proper filter type that suits analyte properties and solution composition and to discard the first few filtrate drops to ensure the accuracy of the analytical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"74 1","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/16/aiht-74-1-aiht-2023-74-3693.PMC10231880.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microfiltration is a common step in liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS), a method of choice in determining several mycotoxins in a solution at once. However, microfiltration may entail filter-analyte interactions that can affect the accuracy of the procedure, and underestimate exposure. The aim of our study was to assess how five different membrane materials for syringe filters (nylon, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyethersulphone, mixed cellulose ester, and cellulose acetate) affect microfiltration and recovery of EU-regulated mycotoxins, including aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins B1 and B2, zearalenone, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, and ochratoxin A. Polytetrafluoroethylene filters turned out to least affect microfiltration through mycotoxin loss, followed by more commonly used nylon filters, whereas the remaining three filter membrane materials had such a negative effect on recoveries that we found them incompatible with the procedure. Our findings clearly suggest that it is important to select a proper filter type that suits analyte properties and solution composition and to discard the first few filtrate drops to ensure the accuracy of the analytical procedure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同微过滤器如何影响11种欧盟管制真菌毒素的回收。
微滤是液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS)的常用步骤,是同时测定溶液中几种真菌毒素的首选方法。然而,微过滤可能会导致过滤器-分析物相互作用,从而影响程序的准确性,并低估暴露。我们的研究目的是评估五种不同的注射器过滤器膜材料(尼龙、聚四氟乙烯、聚醚砜、混合纤维素酯和醋酸纤维素)如何影响欧盟规定的真菌毒素的微过滤和回收,包括黄曲霉毒素B1、B2、G1和G2、脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇、伏马菌素B1和B2、玉米赤霉烯酮、T-2和HT-2毒素以及赭曲霉毒素a。聚四氟乙烯过滤器通过真菌毒素损失对微过滤的影响最小。其次是更常用的尼龙过滤器,而其余三种过滤膜材料对回收率有负面影响,我们发现它们与程序不相容。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,选择适合分析物性质和溶液组成的合适过滤器类型以及丢弃前几滴滤液以确保分析过程的准确性是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Bis(amino acidato)copper(II) compounds in blood plasma: a review of computed structural properties and amino acid affinities for Cu2+ informing further pharmacological research. Difference between hand and forearm transepidermal water loss and skin pH as an improved method to biomonitor occupational hand eczema: our findings in healthcare workers. Does organisational myopia mediate the effect of occupational health and safety practices on the risk of occupational accidents in Turkish healthcare institutions? Factors predicting the level of vaccine protection against hepatitis B virus infection among physicians and nurses in Šabac, Serbia. Justice sensitivity among nurses and physiotherapists in a Croatian rehabilitation hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1