Global Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Priority-Matching Correction Technique to Prevent Postoperative Coronal Decompensation.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1177/21925682231178202
Shibao Lu, Weiguo Zhu, Ashish D Diwan, Jeffrey C Wang, Guoguang Zhao, Zorica Buser, Dongfan Wang, Peng Cui, Yu Wang, Chao Kong, Wei Wang, Xiaolong Chen
{"title":"Global Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Priority-Matching Correction Technique to Prevent Postoperative Coronal Decompensation.","authors":"Shibao Lu, Weiguo Zhu, Ashish D Diwan, Jeffrey C Wang, Guoguang Zhao, Zorica Buser, Dongfan Wang, Peng Cui, Yu Wang, Chao Kong, Wei Wang, Xiaolong Chen","doi":"10.1177/21925682231178202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze global coronal malalignment (GCM) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and to prospectively investigate the performance of priority-matching correction technique on preventing postoperative coronal imbalance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 444 DLS inpatients and outpatients were recruited. GCMs were classified into 2 types: Type 1, GCM with thoracolumbar (TL/L) curve as the main contribution on coronal imbalance; Type 2, GCM with lumbosacral (LS) curve as the main contribution on coronal imbalance. Patients receiving priority-matching correction were assigned to Group P-M and receiving traditional correction were assigned to Group T form August 2020. The fundamental principle of priority-matching technique was to first correct the key curve contributing to coronal imbalance rather than the curve with greater magnitude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Type 1 GCM accounted for 45% and Type 2 GCM accounted for 55% of patients. Type 2 GCM was detected to have greater LS Cobb angle and L4 tilt. At 1-year follow-up, 29.8% of patients with Type 2 GCM, whereas 11.7% of patients with Type 1 GCM were observed to have postoperative coronal decompensation. Patients with postoperative imbalance were revealed to have greater preoperative LS Cobb angle and L4 tilt and smaller correction extent of LS curve and L4 tilt. 6.25% of patients developed postoperative coronal imbalance in Group P-M, whereas 40.5% developed in Group T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Highlighting priority and aggressive correction of the key curve to coronal imbalance, priority-matching technique was proved to be able to limit the development of postoperative coronal decompensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2327-2339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231178202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A prospective case-control study.

Objective: To analyze global coronal malalignment (GCM) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and to prospectively investigate the performance of priority-matching correction technique on preventing postoperative coronal imbalance.

Methods: A total of 444 DLS inpatients and outpatients were recruited. GCMs were classified into 2 types: Type 1, GCM with thoracolumbar (TL/L) curve as the main contribution on coronal imbalance; Type 2, GCM with lumbosacral (LS) curve as the main contribution on coronal imbalance. Patients receiving priority-matching correction were assigned to Group P-M and receiving traditional correction were assigned to Group T form August 2020. The fundamental principle of priority-matching technique was to first correct the key curve contributing to coronal imbalance rather than the curve with greater magnitude.

Results: Type 1 GCM accounted for 45% and Type 2 GCM accounted for 55% of patients. Type 2 GCM was detected to have greater LS Cobb angle and L4 tilt. At 1-year follow-up, 29.8% of patients with Type 2 GCM, whereas 11.7% of patients with Type 1 GCM were observed to have postoperative coronal decompensation. Patients with postoperative imbalance were revealed to have greater preoperative LS Cobb angle and L4 tilt and smaller correction extent of LS curve and L4 tilt. 6.25% of patients developed postoperative coronal imbalance in Group P-M, whereas 40.5% developed in Group T.

Conclusion: Highlighting priority and aggressive correction of the key curve to coronal imbalance, priority-matching technique was proved to be able to limit the development of postoperative coronal decompensation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
退行性腰椎侧弯症的整体冠状位错位和防止术后冠状位失调的优先匹配矫正技术。
研究设计前瞻性病例对照研究:分析退行性腰椎侧弯症(DLS)患者的整体冠状位错位(GCM),并前瞻性地研究优先匹配矫正技术在预防术后冠状位失衡方面的性能:方法:共招募了 444 名 DLS 住院和门诊患者。GCM分为两种类型:类型 1:主要由胸腰椎 (TL/L) 曲线导致冠状失衡的 GCM;类型 2:主要由腰骶部 (LS) 曲线导致冠状失衡的 GCM。2020 年 8 月,接受优先匹配矫正的患者被分配到 P-M 组,接受传统矫正的患者被分配到 T 组。优先匹配技术的基本原则是首先矫正导致冠状失衡的关键曲线,而不是幅度较大的曲线:结果:1 型 GCM 患者占 45%,2 型 GCM 患者占 55%。发现 2 型 GCM 的 LS Cobb 角和 L4 倾斜更大。在 1 年的随访中,29.8% 的 2 型 GCM 患者和 11.7% 的 1 型 GCM 患者在术后出现冠状面失调。术后失衡的患者术前 LS Cobb 角和 L4 倾斜度较大,LS 曲线和 L4 倾斜度的矫正范围较小。P-M组有6.25%的患者出现术后冠状失衡,而T组则有40.5%:结论:事实证明,优先匹配技术能够限制术后冠状失衡的发展,突出了优先和积极矫正冠状失衡的关键曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
CT-Derived Hounsfield Units vs Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Spine Surgical Candidates: Concordance, Discordance, and Clinically Actionable Thresholds. Temporary Occiput-C2 Fixation for Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Reliable Alternative to Halo-Vest? Minimum Two-Year Clinical Outcomes. C2-Involving Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL): Dome-like Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion. miR-200a-3p Alleviates Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in Spinal Cord Injury via PTEN Targeting: A Potential Diagnostic Biomarker. Level I Trauma Centers Are Associated With Lower Adjusted In-Hospital Mortality After Operative Spine Trauma: Analysis of the 2023 United States National Trauma Data Bank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1