Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Medical Education in the Interdisciplinary Team: A Novel, Targeted Approach.

Billy Jenkins, Katrina Lester, Alex Nobel, Helen Such, Barbara Yawn, Alison Scott
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Medical Education in the Interdisciplinary Team: A Novel, Targeted Approach.","authors":"Billy Jenkins,&nbsp;Katrina Lester,&nbsp;Alex Nobel,&nbsp;Helen Such,&nbsp;Barbara Yawn,&nbsp;Alison Scott","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2022.2161730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to maximise the learning potential of medical education programmes aimed at interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary teams, it is important to understand how the effectiveness of these programmes can vary between healthcare professionals from different specialities. Measuring the impact of educational activities between specialities may facilitate the development of future interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary education programmes, yielding enhanced learner outcomes and, ultimately, improving outcomes for patients. In this analysis, we report on a new approach to measuring change in knowledge and competence among learners from different physician specialities. We did this by tailoring post-activity competency assessments to three specialities - primary care physicians, pulmonologists and immunologists caring for patients with severe asthma. Our findings revealed that primary care physicians had markedly improved knowledge, measured using assessment questions, compared with the other specialities after completing the activity. We also report on differences between these specialities in intention to change clinical practice, confidence in clinical practice, and remaining educational gaps. Understanding how different members of the interdisciplinary team have benefited from an educational activity is essential for designing future educational activities and targeting resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/20/ZJEC_12_2161730.PMC10031772.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2022.2161730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to maximise the learning potential of medical education programmes aimed at interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary teams, it is important to understand how the effectiveness of these programmes can vary between healthcare professionals from different specialities. Measuring the impact of educational activities between specialities may facilitate the development of future interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary education programmes, yielding enhanced learner outcomes and, ultimately, improving outcomes for patients. In this analysis, we report on a new approach to measuring change in knowledge and competence among learners from different physician specialities. We did this by tailoring post-activity competency assessments to three specialities - primary care physicians, pulmonologists and immunologists caring for patients with severe asthma. Our findings revealed that primary care physicians had markedly improved knowledge, measured using assessment questions, compared with the other specialities after completing the activity. We also report on differences between these specialities in intention to change clinical practice, confidence in clinical practice, and remaining educational gaps. Understanding how different members of the interdisciplinary team have benefited from an educational activity is essential for designing future educational activities and targeting resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估继续医学教育在跨学科团队中的影响:一种新颖的、有针对性的方法。
为了最大限度地发挥针对跨学科或多学科团队的医学教育方案的学习潜力,重要的是要了解这些方案的有效性如何在不同专业的医疗保健专业人员之间有所不同。衡量不同专业之间的教育活动的影响可能会促进未来跨学科和多学科教育计划的发展,从而提高学习者的学习效果,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。在本分析中,我们报告了一种新的方法来衡量不同医师专业的学习者在知识和能力方面的变化。为此,我们将活动后能力评估调整为三个专业——初级保健医生、肺科医生和治疗严重哮喘患者的免疫学家。我们的研究结果显示,在完成活动后,与其他专业相比,初级保健医生的知识有了明显的提高,用评估问题来衡量。我们还报告了这些专业在改变临床实践的意图、对临床实践的信心和剩余的教育差距方面的差异。了解跨学科团队的不同成员如何从教育活动中受益,对于设计未来的教育活动和定位资源至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Clinician-Scientists Access and Mobilise Social Capital and Thus Contribute to the Professional Development of Their Colleagues in Their Networks. Long-Term Effects of Individual-Focused and Team-Based Training on Health Professionals' Intention to Have Serious Illness Conversations: A Cluster Randomised Trial. A Systematic Investigation of Assessment Scores, Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Practice: Are They Related? Evolving Maintenance of Certification in Canada: A Collaborative Journey. Finding the Invisible Patient to Address Substance Use, Violence, and Depression in Women Living with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1