Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.4103/EUS-D-22-00077
Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Alec E Faggen, Muhammad Aziz, Saurabh Chandan, Zohaib Ahmed, Abdul Kouanda, Sun-Chuan Dai, Craig A Munroe, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage for benign biliary obstruction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Faisal Kamal,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Khan,&nbsp;Wade Lee-Smith,&nbsp;Sachit Sharma,&nbsp;Ashu Acharya,&nbsp;Umer Farooq,&nbsp;Zahid Ijaz Tarar,&nbsp;Alec E Faggen,&nbsp;Muhammad Aziz,&nbsp;Saurabh Chandan,&nbsp;Zohaib Ahmed,&nbsp;Abdul Kouanda,&nbsp;Sun-Chuan Dai,&nbsp;Craig A Munroe,&nbsp;Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.4103/EUS-D-22-00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ERCP is the first line of treatment for benign and malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. Recently, several studies have evaluated the role of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed several databases from inception to July 8, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. Our outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, and adverse events. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed including patients with normal anatomy versus surgically altered anatomy (SAA). Heterogeneity was assessed by I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies with 329 patients. The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success was 88% (83%, 92%). The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success for patients with SAA and normal anatomy was 92% (85%, 96%) and 83% (75%, 89%), respectively. The pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 89% (83%, 93%) and 19% (13%, 26%), respectively. We found low heterogeneity in most of the analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-BD is an effective and safe option in patients with benign biliary obstruction and should be considered after a failed attempt at ERCP or when ERCP is not technically possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"12 2","pages":"228-236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/21/EUS-12-228.PMC10237615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: ERCP is the first line of treatment for benign and malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. Recently, several studies have evaluated the role of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction.

Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to July 8, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in the management of benign biliary obstruction. Our outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, and adverse events. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes were calculated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed including patients with normal anatomy versus surgically altered anatomy (SAA). Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic.

Results: We included 14 studies with 329 patients. The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success was 88% (83%, 92%). The pooled rate (95% CI) of technical success for patients with SAA and normal anatomy was 92% (85%, 96%) and 83% (75%, 89%), respectively. The pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 89% (83%, 93%) and 19% (13%, 26%), respectively. We found low heterogeneity in most of the analyses.

Conclusions: EUS-BD is an effective and safe option in patients with benign biliary obstruction and should be considered after a failed attempt at ERCP or when ERCP is not technically possible.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EUS引导下胆道引流治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性——一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:ERCP是治疗良恶性胆道梗阻的第一线,EUS引导下胆道引流(EUS-BD)通常用于ERCP失败的患者。最近,一些研究评估了EUS-BD在良性胆道梗阻治疗中的作用。本荟萃分析评估了EUS-BD治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性。方法:我们回顾了从成立到2022年7月8日的几个数据库,以确定评估EUS-BD治疗良性胆道梗阻的疗效和安全性的研究。我们感兴趣的结果是技术成功、临床成功和不良事件。使用随机效应模型计算所有结果的95%置信区间(CI)的合并率。进行亚组分析,包括解剖结构正常与手术改变(SAA)的患者。通过I2统计评估异质性。结果:我们纳入了14项研究,涉及329名患者。技术成功的合并率(95%CI)为88%(83%,92%)。SAA和正常解剖患者的技术成功率(95%CI)分别为92%(85%,96%)和83%(75%,89%)。临床成功率和不良事件的合并率(95%CI)分别为89%(83%,93%)和19%(13%,26%)。我们在大多数分析中发现异质性较低。结论:EUS-BD在良性胆道梗阻患者中是一种有效且安全的选择,在ERCP尝试失败或ERCP在技术上不可行时应考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
期刊最新文献
Consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis from a Chinese multiple disciplinary team expert panel Computed tomography–based radial endobronchial ultrasound image simulation of peripheral pulmonary lesions using deep learning Comments and illustrations of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidelines: Multiparametric imaging and EUS-guided sampling in rare pancreatic tumors. Benign mesenchymal pancreatic tumors A rare but interesting case of small intestinal tumor diagnosed by transrectal EUS-FNA (with video). Detective flow imaging versus contrast-enhanced EUS in solid pancreatic lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1