Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Q2 Medicine Medicinski arhiv Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117
Alan Jahic, Emir Mujanovic, Mugdim Bajric, Denis Mirsic, Ismar Hasukic
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.","authors":"Alan Jahic,&nbsp;Emir Mujanovic,&nbsp;Mugdim Bajric,&nbsp;Denis Mirsic,&nbsp;Ismar Hasukic","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among interventional cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the duration of the procedure, the amount of delivered ionizing radiation, the amount of applied contrast agent, the frequency of procedural complications and patient comfort during coronary angiography performed via TR and TF arterial approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total sample of 240 respondents was divided into two groups in such a way that the first group consisted of 121 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TR arterial approach, and the second group consisted of 119 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TF arterial approach. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the research objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained research results showed that the duration of coronary angiography and the amount of radiation was greater when using TR arterial approach compared to TF approach. There is no statistically significant difference in relation to the amount of applied contrast medium and the frequency of complications between the two approaches. Periprocedural and postprocedural comfort was better in patents who underwent TR approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study show that diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TR arterial approach is as safe for the patient as diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TF arterial approach. With both approaches, there is no significant difference in the amount of contrast agent used nor in the frequency of complications. Procedure duration and radiation exposure are shorter when TF arterial approach i used, while patient comfort is better when the TR arterial approach is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":18421,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski arhiv","volume":"77 2","pages":"112-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/86/medarch-77-112.PMC10227836.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski arhiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among interventional cardiologists.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the duration of the procedure, the amount of delivered ionizing radiation, the amount of applied contrast agent, the frequency of procedural complications and patient comfort during coronary angiography performed via TR and TF arterial approach.

Methods: The total sample of 240 respondents was divided into two groups in such a way that the first group consisted of 121 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TR arterial approach, and the second group consisted of 119 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TF arterial approach. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the research objective.

Results: The obtained research results showed that the duration of coronary angiography and the amount of radiation was greater when using TR arterial approach compared to TF approach. There is no statistically significant difference in relation to the amount of applied contrast medium and the frequency of complications between the two approaches. Periprocedural and postprocedural comfort was better in patents who underwent TR approach.

Conclusion: The findings of this study show that diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TR arterial approach is as safe for the patient as diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TF arterial approach. With both approaches, there is no significant difference in the amount of contrast agent used nor in the frequency of complications. Procedure duration and radiation exposure are shorter when TF arterial approach i used, while patient comfort is better when the TR arterial approach is used.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经桡动脉入路与经股动脉入路诊断冠状动脉造影的比较分析。
背景:在世界上大多数中心以及波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,经股动脉入路仍然是诊断冠状动脉造影最常用的入路。近年来,经桡动脉入路在介入心脏病专家中得到越来越多的支持。目的:比较经TR和TF动脉入路冠状动脉造影的手术时间、电离辐射量、造影剂用量、手术并发症发生频率和患者舒适度。方法:将240例被调查者分为两组,第一组121例经TR动脉入路行冠状动脉造影,第二组119例经TF动脉入路行冠状动脉造影。采用Mann-Whitney U检验对研究目标进行验证。结果:获得的研究结果显示,与TF入路相比,TR动脉入路冠状动脉造影时间和放射线量更大。两种入路在造影剂用量和并发症发生率方面无统计学差异。经TR入路的患者术中、术后舒适度较好。结论:本研究结果表明,经TR动脉入路行诊断性冠状动脉造影与经TF动脉入路行诊断性冠状动脉造影对患者同样安全。两种方法在造影剂用量和并发症发生频率上均无显著差异。采用TF动脉入路手术时间和放疗时间较短,而采用TR动脉入路患者舒适度较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicinski arhiv
Medicinski arhiv Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Secretome of Hypoxia-Preconditioned Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Angiogenesis in Diabetic Rats with Peripheral Artery Disease. Perforated Stress Ulcer of the Duodenum: a Case of an Unexpected Diagnosis in a COVID-19 Patient Following Dilatation and Curettage Procedure. Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors. The Importance of Prediabetes Screening in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. The Correlation of Positive and Negative Symptoms (PANSS Scores) in Patients with Schizophrenia According to Gender.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1