Dynamic Assessment and Sustainability Strategies of Ecological Security in the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China.

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Chinese Geographical Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-11 DOI:10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z
Jie Fan, Ahemaitihali Abudumanan, Li Wang, Daojing Zhou, Zhao Wang, Hanchu Liu
{"title":"Dynamic Assessment and Sustainability Strategies of Ecological Security in the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China.","authors":"Jie Fan,&nbsp;Ahemaitihali Abudumanan,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Daojing Zhou,&nbsp;Zhao Wang,&nbsp;Hanchu Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The drylands of China are extensive, and they are home to more than one-third of the country's population. However, the watershed territories of the drylands, where the majority of human activities are concentrated have long experienced strained human-land relationships, culminating in ecological security concerns. Correspondingly, it is essential to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the ecological security of dryland watersheds and to identify the key factors influencing ecological security in order to formulate strategies that ensure the sustainability of drylands. Premised on the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, this study developed an ecological security index and applied it to the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020. The obstacle degree model was applied to reveal the obstacles in two dimensions: criterion level and indicator level. The findings suggested that the ecological security comprehensive index in the Irtysh River Basin has increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, irrespective of the fact that it decreased during the study period and then increased. The ecological security level changed from 'critically safe' in 2000 to 'general safety' in 2020, with the state subsystem and pressure subsystem becoming ecological security weaknesses. The primary factors influencing the ecological security of the study area were water consumption, the area of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation, the proportion of wetland area, vegetation coverage, and livestock population. The ecological security of different counties in the basin varies greatly, whereas the factors that influence ecological security showed both similarities and differences among the counties. In light of on the findings, we proposed that future strategies for ecological security enhancement should concentrate on enacting the policy of localizing spatial differentiation, optimizing industrial structure, strengthening scientific and technological support in the field of water conservation, bolstering the treatment capacity of environmental facilities, and implementing the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System to support the sustainable development of dryland watersheds.</p>","PeriodicalId":55258,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Geographical Science","volume":"33 3","pages":"393-409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10007664/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Geographical Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-023-1347-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The drylands of China are extensive, and they are home to more than one-third of the country's population. However, the watershed territories of the drylands, where the majority of human activities are concentrated have long experienced strained human-land relationships, culminating in ecological security concerns. Correspondingly, it is essential to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the ecological security of dryland watersheds and to identify the key factors influencing ecological security in order to formulate strategies that ensure the sustainability of drylands. Premised on the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, this study developed an ecological security index and applied it to the Irtysh River Basin of Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020. The obstacle degree model was applied to reveal the obstacles in two dimensions: criterion level and indicator level. The findings suggested that the ecological security comprehensive index in the Irtysh River Basin has increased significantly from 2000 to 2020, irrespective of the fact that it decreased during the study period and then increased. The ecological security level changed from 'critically safe' in 2000 to 'general safety' in 2020, with the state subsystem and pressure subsystem becoming ecological security weaknesses. The primary factors influencing the ecological security of the study area were water consumption, the area of high-efficiency water-saving irrigation, the proportion of wetland area, vegetation coverage, and livestock population. The ecological security of different counties in the basin varies greatly, whereas the factors that influence ecological security showed both similarities and differences among the counties. In light of on the findings, we proposed that future strategies for ecological security enhancement should concentrate on enacting the policy of localizing spatial differentiation, optimizing industrial structure, strengthening scientific and technological support in the field of water conservation, bolstering the treatment capacity of environmental facilities, and implementing the Mountains-Rivers-Forests-Farmlands-Lakes-Grasslands System to support the sustainable development of dryland watersheds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新疆额尔齐斯河流域生态安全动态评价与可持续发展战略。
中国的旱地面积很大,占全国人口的三分之一以上。然而,大多数人类活动都集中在旱地的分水岭地区,长期以来人地关系紧张,最终导致生态安全问题。相应地,必须对旱地流域的生态安全进行全面评估,并确定影响生态安全的关键因素,以便制定确保旱地可持续性的战略。本研究在驱动压力-状态-影响响应(DPSIR)模型的基础上,建立了生态安全指数,并于2000年至2020年将其应用于新疆额尔齐斯河流域。运用障碍度模型从两个维度揭示障碍:标准层面和指标层面。研究结果表明,从2000年到2020年,额尔齐斯河流域的生态安全综合指数显著上升,尽管在研究期间有所下降,然后又有所上升。生态安全水平从2000年的“极度安全”转变为2020年的“一般安全”,状态子系统和压力子系统成为生态安全薄弱环节。影响研究区生态安全的主要因素是用水量、高效节水灌溉面积、湿地面积比例、植被覆盖率和牲畜数量。流域内不同县域的生态安全差异较大,而影响生态安全的因素在县域之间既有相似性,也有差异性。根据研究结果,我们提出,未来的生态安全增强战略应集中在制定空间差异化政策、优化产业结构、加强节水领域的科技支持、提高环境设施的处理能力、,实施山区-河流-森林-农田-湖泊-草地系统,以支持旱地流域的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Geographical Science
Chinese Geographical Science 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Geographical Science is an international journal, sponsored by Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and published by Science Press, Beijing, China. Chinese Geographical Science is devoted to leading scientific and technological innovation in geography, serving development in China, and promoting international scientific exchange. The journal mainly covers physical geography and its sub-disciplines, human geography and its sub-disciplines, cartography, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. It pays close attention to the major issues the world is concerned with, such as the man-land relationship, population, resources, environment, globalization and regional development.
期刊最新文献
City Network Evolution Characteristics of Smart Industry: Evidence from Yangtze River Delta, China Spatial Equity Evaluation of Rural Eldercare Service Resources Based on Accessibility: A Case Study of Huanxian County of Gansu Province, China Impact of Hinterland Manufacturing on the Development of Container Ports: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta, China Dynamic Identification and Evolution of Urban-suburban-rural Transition Zones Based on the Blender of Natural and Humanistic Factors: A Case Study of Chengdu, China Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Heat Islands and Optimization of Spatial Network Construction in the Central Urban Area of Fuzhou City, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1