Evaluation of MTT reducers and strongly colored substances in the Short Time Exposure test method for assessing eye irritation potential.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY Journal of Toxicological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2131/jts.48.363
Takayuki Abo, Yuuki Deguchi, Takuo Yuki, Yutaka Takahashi, Masaaki Miyazawa, Hitoshi Sakaguchi
{"title":"Evaluation of MTT reducers and strongly colored substances in the Short Time Exposure test method for assessing eye irritation potential.","authors":"Takayuki Abo,&nbsp;Yuuki Deguchi,&nbsp;Takuo Yuki,&nbsp;Yutaka Takahashi,&nbsp;Masaaki Miyazawa,&nbsp;Hitoshi Sakaguchi","doi":"10.2131/jts.48.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Short Time Exposure (STE) test evaluates eye irritation potential using a 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. MTT assays may underpredict results for some substances that directly reduce MTT (i.e., MTT reducers) or interfere with absorbance because of their strong color (i.e., strongly colored substances). Based on previous research, we selected 25 substances as MTT reducers. Of these, 13 were expected to be MTT reducers at 5% dilution (5% MTT reducers) of the STE test condition. These 13 substances were then tested to determine whether the results were interfered from direct MTT reduction. Those 5% MTT reducers that were classified as irritants based on in vivo data were identified as irritants by the STE test. In addition, the low cell viability results at 5% dilution suggested that direct MTT reduction had not occurred. Next, the remaining 5% MTT reducers that were classified as non-irritants based on in vivo data were identified as non-irritants by the STE test. We then examined two strongly colored substances. One was classified as an irritant based on in vivo data and was confirmed as an irritant by the STE test. The other was classified as a non-irritant by the STE test. This was further evaluated using a medium that did not contain MTT; the result indicated that it was a non-irritant correctly. In conclusion, the STE test is useful for evaluating eye irritation potential without the drawback of underprediction for MTT reducers and strongly colored substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":17654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","volume":"48 6","pages":"363-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.48.363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Short Time Exposure (STE) test evaluates eye irritation potential using a 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. MTT assays may underpredict results for some substances that directly reduce MTT (i.e., MTT reducers) or interfere with absorbance because of their strong color (i.e., strongly colored substances). Based on previous research, we selected 25 substances as MTT reducers. Of these, 13 were expected to be MTT reducers at 5% dilution (5% MTT reducers) of the STE test condition. These 13 substances were then tested to determine whether the results were interfered from direct MTT reduction. Those 5% MTT reducers that were classified as irritants based on in vivo data were identified as irritants by the STE test. In addition, the low cell viability results at 5% dilution suggested that direct MTT reduction had not occurred. Next, the remaining 5% MTT reducers that were classified as non-irritants based on in vivo data were identified as non-irritants by the STE test. We then examined two strongly colored substances. One was classified as an irritant based on in vivo data and was confirmed as an irritant by the STE test. The other was classified as a non-irritant by the STE test. This was further evaluated using a medium that did not contain MTT; the result indicated that it was a non-irritant correctly. In conclusion, the STE test is useful for evaluating eye irritation potential without the drawback of underprediction for MTT reducers and strongly colored substances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在评估眼睛刺激电位的短时间暴露试验方法中对MTT还原剂和强色物质的评价。
短时间暴露(STE)试验使用3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四唑(MTT)测定法评估眼睛刺激潜能。对于一些直接降低MTT的物质(即MTT还原剂),MTT测定可能会低估结果,或者由于它们的强颜色(即强颜色物质)而干扰吸光度。在前人研究的基础上,我们选择了25种物质作为MTT还原剂。其中,在STE测试条件的5%稀释(5% MTT还原剂)下,预计有13种是MTT还原剂。然后测试这13种物质,以确定结果是否受到直接MTT还原的干扰。根据体内数据归类为刺激物的5% MTT还原剂通过STE测试被识别为刺激物。此外,5%稀释后的低细胞活力结果表明,没有发生直接的MTT减少。接下来,剩余的5%根据体内数据被归类为非刺激物的MTT还原剂通过STE测试被确定为非刺激物。然后我们检查了两种颜色强烈的物质。一种是根据体内数据归类为刺激物,并通过STE测试确认为刺激物。另一个经STE测试为非刺激物。使用不含MTT的培养基进一步评估;结果表明,它是一种正确的无刺激性物质。综上所述,STE测试可用于评估眼睛刺激电位,而不会对MTT还原剂和强颜色物质预测不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) is a scientific journal that publishes research about the mechanisms and significance of the toxicity of substances, such as drugs, food additives, food contaminants and environmental pollutants. Papers on the toxicities and effects of extracts and mixtures containing unidentified compounds cannot be accepted as a general rule.
期刊最新文献
Benzalkonium chloride initiates proinflammatory responses via NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Evaluation of rewarding effects of nitazene analogs: results from conditioned place preference tests and in vivo microdialysis experiments in mice. Investigation of additional suitable positive controls in the human Cell Line Activation Test. Toxicity of nickel, copper, and selenium in medaka embryos (oryzias latipes): a comparative study. Construction and evaluation of an open-source database for inhalation-based physiologically based kinetic modeling of selected categories for industrial chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1