How to Improve Patients' Perceived Quality of Sleep During Hospitalization Through a Multicomponent "Good Sleep Bundle": A Prospective Before and After Controlled Study.

Barbara Ragonese, Valeria Denotti, Vincenzina Lo Re, Giovanni Vizzini, Brigida Corso, Giuseppe Arena, Rosario Girgenti, Maria Luisa Fazzina, Fabio Tuzzolino, Michele Pilato, Angelo Luca
{"title":"How to Improve Patients' Perceived Quality of Sleep During Hospitalization Through a Multicomponent \"Good Sleep Bundle\": A Prospective Before and After Controlled Study.","authors":"Barbara Ragonese,&nbsp;Valeria Denotti,&nbsp;Vincenzina Lo Re,&nbsp;Giovanni Vizzini,&nbsp;Brigida Corso,&nbsp;Giuseppe Arena,&nbsp;Rosario Girgenti,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Fazzina,&nbsp;Fabio Tuzzolino,&nbsp;Michele Pilato,&nbsp;Angelo Luca","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-22-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite sound evidence on the importance of sleep for human beings and its role in healing, hospitalized patients still experience sleep disruption with deleterious effects. Many factors affecting patients' sleep can be removed or minimized. We evaluated the efficacy of a multicomponent Good Sleep Bundle (GSB) developed to improve patients' perceived quality of sleep, through which we modified environmental factors, timing of nighttime clinical interventions, and actively involved patients in order to positively influence their experience during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective, before and after controlled study, two different groups of 65 patients each were admitted to a cardiothoracic unit in two different periods, receiving the usual care (control group) and the GSB (GSB group), respectively. Sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at the admission, discharge, and 30 days after discharge in all patients enrolled. Comparisons between the two groups evaluated changes in PSQI score from admission to discharge (primary endpoint), and from admission to 30 days after discharge (secondary endpoint).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PSQI score difference between admission and discharge was 4.54 (SD 4.11) in the control group, and 2.05 (SD 4.25) in the GSB group. The mean difference in PSQI score change between the two groups, which was the primary endpoint, was 2.49 (SD 4.19). This difference was highly significant (<i>p</i> = 0.0009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GSB was associated with a highly significant reduction of the negative effects that hospitalization produces on patients' perceived quality of sleep compared with the usual care group.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"5 3","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/e8/i2589-9449-5-3-56.PMC10228997.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-22-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite sound evidence on the importance of sleep for human beings and its role in healing, hospitalized patients still experience sleep disruption with deleterious effects. Many factors affecting patients' sleep can be removed or minimized. We evaluated the efficacy of a multicomponent Good Sleep Bundle (GSB) developed to improve patients' perceived quality of sleep, through which we modified environmental factors, timing of nighttime clinical interventions, and actively involved patients in order to positively influence their experience during hospitalization.

Methods: In a prospective, before and after controlled study, two different groups of 65 patients each were admitted to a cardiothoracic unit in two different periods, receiving the usual care (control group) and the GSB (GSB group), respectively. Sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at the admission, discharge, and 30 days after discharge in all patients enrolled. Comparisons between the two groups evaluated changes in PSQI score from admission to discharge (primary endpoint), and from admission to 30 days after discharge (secondary endpoint).

Results: The mean PSQI score difference between admission and discharge was 4.54 (SD 4.11) in the control group, and 2.05 (SD 4.25) in the GSB group. The mean difference in PSQI score change between the two groups, which was the primary endpoint, was 2.49 (SD 4.19). This difference was highly significant (p = 0.0009).

Conclusion: The GSB was associated with a highly significant reduction of the negative effects that hospitalization produces on patients' perceived quality of sleep compared with the usual care group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何通过多组分“良好睡眠束”改善住院期间患者的睡眠感知质量:一项前瞻性前后对照研究
引言:尽管有充分的证据表明睡眠对人类的重要性及其在治疗中的作用,但住院患者仍然会经历睡眠中断的有害影响。许多影响患者睡眠的因素都可以消除或最小化。我们评估了用于改善患者感知睡眠质量的多组分良好睡眠束(GSB)的功效,通过该方法,我们修改了环境因素、夜间临床干预的时间,并积极参与患者,以积极影响他们在住院期间的体验。方法:前瞻性对照研究,前后对照研究,两组患者各65例,分别在两个不同时期入住心脏科,分别接受常规治疗(对照组)和GSB治疗(GSB组)。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)对所有入组患者在入院、出院和出院后30天的睡眠质量进行评估。两组之间的比较评估了入院至出院(主要终点)和入院至出院后30天(次要终点)PSQI评分的变化。结果:对照组入院与出院PSQI评分平均差4.54 (SD 4.11), GSB组入院与出院PSQI评分平均差2.05 (SD 4.25)。两组间PSQI评分变化的平均差异(主要终点)为2.49 (SD 4.19)。这一差异非常显著(p = 0.0009)。结论:与常规护理组相比,GSB与住院治疗对患者感知睡眠质量的负面影响显著降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1