Help-Seeking and Barriers to Service Use amongst Men with Past-Year Suicidal Ideation and not in Contact with Mental Health Services.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2190781
Natalie M Reily, Samantha Tang, Philip J Batterham, Bani Aadam, Brian Draper, Fiona Shand, Jin Han, Angela Nicholas, Helen Christensen
{"title":"Help-Seeking and Barriers to Service Use amongst Men with Past-Year Suicidal Ideation and not in Contact with Mental Health Services.","authors":"Natalie M Reily, Samantha Tang, Philip J Batterham, Bani Aadam, Brian Draper, Fiona Shand, Jin Han, Angela Nicholas, Helen Christensen","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2190781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Men are less likely than women to engage with formal mental health services for suicidality. We describe the sources of support, barriers to service use, and coping strategies of men with past-year suicidal ideation who are not receiving formal mental health services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Australian men experiencing past-year suicidal ideation who also did not receive formal mental health services within the past year (<i>n</i> = 176) completed a survey that assessed help-seeking behaviors, coping strategies and styles, use of general services, barriers to service use, and individual-level characteristics. Analyses included descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common type of support was self-help resources, and self-reliance was the most common barrier to formal mental health service use. Most participants had seen a GP for non-mental-health-related reasons in the past year. Men who did not seek any help for their suicidality experienced lower instrumental barriers and perceived need for support, and lower levels of certain coping styles. Limitations included a cross-sectional design and small sample size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides insight into the help-seeking experiences of men with past-year suicidality and not receiving formal mental health services. The findings suggest it may be helpful to improve the linkage between online and informal sources of support and evidence-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2190781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Men are less likely than women to engage with formal mental health services for suicidality. We describe the sources of support, barriers to service use, and coping strategies of men with past-year suicidal ideation who are not receiving formal mental health services.

Method: Australian men experiencing past-year suicidal ideation who also did not receive formal mental health services within the past year (n = 176) completed a survey that assessed help-seeking behaviors, coping strategies and styles, use of general services, barriers to service use, and individual-level characteristics. Analyses included descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses.

Results: The most common type of support was self-help resources, and self-reliance was the most common barrier to formal mental health service use. Most participants had seen a GP for non-mental-health-related reasons in the past year. Men who did not seek any help for their suicidality experienced lower instrumental barriers and perceived need for support, and lower levels of certain coping styles. Limitations included a cross-sectional design and small sample size.

Conclusion: The current study provides insight into the help-seeking experiences of men with past-year suicidality and not receiving formal mental health services. The findings suggest it may be helpful to improve the linkage between online and informal sources of support and evidence-based interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去一年有自杀倾向但未接触过心理健康服务的男性寻求帮助和使用服务的障碍。
目的:与女性相比,男性因自杀倾向而接受正规心理健康服务的可能性较低。我们描述了过去一年中有自杀倾向但未接受正规心理健康服务的男性的支持来源、使用服务的障碍以及应对策略:方法:过去一年内有自杀倾向但未接受正规心理健康服务的澳大利亚男性(n = 176)完成了一项调查,该调查评估了求助行为、应对策略和方式、一般服务的使用情况、服务使用障碍以及个人特征。分析包括描述性统计和双变量分析:最常见的支持类型是自助资源,而自力更生是使用正规心理健康服务的最常见障碍。大多数参与者在过去一年中都曾因与精神健康无关的原因看过全科医生。没有因自杀而寻求任何帮助的男性所面临的工具性障碍和感知到的支持需求较低,某些应对方式的水平也较低。研究的局限性包括研究设计为横断面且样本量较小:目前的研究有助于深入了解过去一年中有自杀倾向但未接受正规心理健康服务的男性的求助经历。研究结果表明,改善在线和非正式支持来源与循证干预之间的联系可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation. Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide. The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review. The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode. Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1