Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Finger Amputations.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-03 DOI:10.1177/15589447231174480
Nikhil Adapa, Zachary B Adkins, Krystin A Hidden, Kanu S Goyal
{"title":"Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Finger Amputations.","authors":"Nikhil Adapa, Zachary B Adkins, Krystin A Hidden, Kanu S Goyal","doi":"10.1177/15589447231174480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digit amputations are relatively simple and are often performed in the setting of trauma or infection. However, it is not uncommon for digit amputations to undergo secondary revision due to complications or patient dissatisfaction. Identifying factors associated with secondary revision may alter treatment strategy. We hypothesize that the secondary revision rate is affected by digit, initial level of amputation, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing digit amputations in operating rooms at our institution from 2011 to 2017. Secondary revision amputations were defined as a separate return to the operating room following initial surgical amputation, excluding emergency room amputations. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of amputation, and complications were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 278 patients were included with a total of 386 digit amputations and mean follow-up of 2.6 months. Three hundred twenty-six primary digit amputations were performed in 236 patients (group A). Sixty digits were secondarily revised in 42 patients (group B). The secondary revision rate was 17.8% for patients and 15.5% for digits. Patients with heart disease and diabetes mellitus were associated with secondary revision, with wound complications being the leading indication overall (73.8%). Medicare covered 52.4% of patients in group B versus 30.1% in group A (<i>P</i> = .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk factors for secondary revision include Medicare insurance, comorbidities, previous digit amputations, and initial amputation of either the index finger or the distal phalanx. These data may serve as a prediction model to aid surgical decision-making by identifying patients at risk of secondary revision amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231174480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digit amputations are relatively simple and are often performed in the setting of trauma or infection. However, it is not uncommon for digit amputations to undergo secondary revision due to complications or patient dissatisfaction. Identifying factors associated with secondary revision may alter treatment strategy. We hypothesize that the secondary revision rate is affected by digit, initial level of amputation, and comorbidities.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing digit amputations in operating rooms at our institution from 2011 to 2017. Secondary revision amputations were defined as a separate return to the operating room following initial surgical amputation, excluding emergency room amputations. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of amputation, and complications were collected.

Results: In all, 278 patients were included with a total of 386 digit amputations and mean follow-up of 2.6 months. Three hundred twenty-six primary digit amputations were performed in 236 patients (group A). Sixty digits were secondarily revised in 42 patients (group B). The secondary revision rate was 17.8% for patients and 15.5% for digits. Patients with heart disease and diabetes mellitus were associated with secondary revision, with wound complications being the leading indication overall (73.8%). Medicare covered 52.4% of patients in group B versus 30.1% in group A (P = .005).

Conclusion: Risk factors for secondary revision include Medicare insurance, comorbidities, previous digit amputations, and initial amputation of either the index finger or the distal phalanx. These data may serve as a prediction model to aid surgical decision-making by identifying patients at risk of secondary revision amputation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手指截肢后二次翻修的风险因素。
背景:截肢相对简单,通常在创伤或感染的情况下进行。然而,由于并发症或患者不满意而进行二次翻修的情况并不少见。确定与二次翻修相关的因素可能会改变治疗策略。我们假设二次翻修率受截肢部位、初始截肢程度和合并症的影响:我们对 2011 年至 2017 年在本院手术室接受截肢手术的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。二次翻修截肢定义为初次手术截肢后再次返回手术室,不包括急诊室截肢。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、截肢程度和并发症:共有 278 名患者接受了 386 例截肢手术,平均随访时间为 2.6 个月。236名患者(A组)接受了326例初次截肢。42名患者(B组)进行了60个数位的二次修正。患者的二次翻修率为 17.8%,截肢率为 15.5%。心脏病和糖尿病患者与二次翻修有关,而伤口并发症是主要的适应症(73.8%)。B组52.4%的患者享受医疗保险,而A组为30.1%(P = .005):结论:二次翻修的风险因素包括医疗保险、合并症、既往截肢以及食指或远端指骨的初次截肢。这些数据可作为一个预测模型,通过识别有二次翻修截肢风险的患者来帮助手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Early and Late Intrinsic Hand Muscle Reinnervation After End-to-Side AIN to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer. Generic Volar Locking Plate Use in Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes and Cost Reduction. Infections and Patient Satisfaction in WALANT Hand Surgery in a Hospital Procedure Room. Management Options and Clinical Outcomes After Flexor Tendon Ruptures Following Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures. Decreased Complication Rate Using Partially Threaded Compared With Fully Threaded Compression Screws in 4 Corner Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1