Outcomes of a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for elective, periprocedural support of high-risk percutaneous cardiac interventions: An experience from a latinamerican center.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/02676591231178413
Juan F Bulnes, Alejandro Martínez, Pablo Sepúlveda, Alberto Fuensalida, Santiago Besa, Luis Garrido, Gonzalo Martínez
{"title":"Outcomes of a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for elective, periprocedural support of high-risk percutaneous cardiac interventions: An experience from a latinamerican center.","authors":"Juan F Bulnes, Alejandro Martínez, Pablo Sepúlveda, Alberto Fuensalida, Santiago Besa, Luis Garrido, Gonzalo Martínez","doi":"10.1177/02676591231178413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology include a wide spectrum of clinical and anatomical scenarios related to a higher periprocedural morbidity and mortality. The prophylactic use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) may improve both the safety and efficacy of the intervention by leading to more stable procedural hemodynamics. However, the significant costs may limit its use in resource constrained settings. To overcome this limitation, we ideated a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (V-A ECMO) setup.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational prospective study including all patients undergoing a high-risk interventional cardiology procedure at our institution under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost version of V-A ECMO, where some components of the standard V-A ECMO circuit were replaced by supplies used for cardiac surgical cardiopulmonary bypass, achieving a cost reduction of 72%. We assessed in-hospital and mid-term outcomes, including procedural success, post-procedure complications and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between March 2016 and December 2021, ten patients underwent high-risk IC procedures with prophylactic use of V-A ECMO. Isolated percutaneous intervention (PCI) was performed in six patients, isolated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in two, and a combined procedure (PCI + TAVR) in two. Mean ejection fraction was 34% (range 20-64%). Mean STS PROM was 16.2% (range 9.5-35.8%) and mean EuroScore was 23.7% (range 1.5-60%). The planned intervention was successfully performed in all cases. There were no reports of V-A ECMO malfunction. In nine patients the VA-ECMO was withdrawn immediately after the procedure but one patient required extended - 24 h - support with no significant issues. One patient experienced a periprocedural myocardial infarction and another developed a femoral pseudoaneurysm. In-hospital and 30-day survival were 100%, and 1-year survival was 80%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology can be successfully performed under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost V-A ECMO, suitable for limited-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591231178413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology include a wide spectrum of clinical and anatomical scenarios related to a higher periprocedural morbidity and mortality. The prophylactic use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) may improve both the safety and efficacy of the intervention by leading to more stable procedural hemodynamics. However, the significant costs may limit its use in resource constrained settings. To overcome this limitation, we ideated a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (V-A ECMO) setup.

Methods: We conducted an observational prospective study including all patients undergoing a high-risk interventional cardiology procedure at our institution under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost version of V-A ECMO, where some components of the standard V-A ECMO circuit were replaced by supplies used for cardiac surgical cardiopulmonary bypass, achieving a cost reduction of 72%. We assessed in-hospital and mid-term outcomes, including procedural success, post-procedure complications and mortality.

Results: Between March 2016 and December 2021, ten patients underwent high-risk IC procedures with prophylactic use of V-A ECMO. Isolated percutaneous intervention (PCI) was performed in six patients, isolated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in two, and a combined procedure (PCI + TAVR) in two. Mean ejection fraction was 34% (range 20-64%). Mean STS PROM was 16.2% (range 9.5-35.8%) and mean EuroScore was 23.7% (range 1.5-60%). The planned intervention was successfully performed in all cases. There were no reports of V-A ECMO malfunction. In nine patients the VA-ECMO was withdrawn immediately after the procedure but one patient required extended - 24 h - support with no significant issues. One patient experienced a periprocedural myocardial infarction and another developed a femoral pseudoaneurysm. In-hospital and 30-day survival were 100%, and 1-year survival was 80%.

Conclusions: High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology can be successfully performed under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost V-A ECMO, suitable for limited-resource settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良型低成本静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(V-A ECMO)用于高风险经皮心脏介入手术的择期、围手术期支持的效果:来自拉丁美洲中心的经验。
导言:介入心脏病学中的高风险手术包括与较高围手术期发病率和死亡率有关的各种临床和解剖情况。预防性使用短期机械循环支持(ST-MCS)可使术中血流动力学更加稳定,从而提高介入治疗的安全性和有效性。然而,高昂的费用可能会限制其在资源有限环境中的使用。为了克服这一限制,我们设想了一种改良的、低成本的静脉-动脉体外膜氧合器(V-A ECMO)装置:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象包括在我院接受预防性 ST-MCS 的高风险介入心脏病学手术的所有患者,使用的是改良的低成本版 V-A ECMO,其中标准 V-A ECMO 电路的部分组件由心脏外科心肺旁路所用的耗材取代,成本降低了 72%。我们评估了院内和中期结果,包括手术成功率、术后并发症和死亡率:2016 年 3 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,10 名患者接受了高风险 IC 手术,并预防性使用了 V-A ECMO。六名患者接受了单独的经皮介入手术(PCI),两名患者接受了单独的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR),两名患者接受了联合手术(PCI + TAVR)。平均射血分数为 34%(范围为 20-64%)。平均STS PROM为16.2%(范围9.5-35.8%),平均EuroScore为23.7%(范围1.5-60%)。所有病例均成功实施了计划中的介入治疗。没有关于 V-A ECMO 故障的报告。有九名患者在手术后立即撤除了 VA-ECMO,但有一名患者需要延长 24 小时的支持,但没有出现重大问题。一名患者发生了围手术期心肌梗塞,另一名患者出现了股骨假性动脉瘤。住院和30天存活率均为100%,1年存活率为80%:结论:介入心脏病学中的高风险手术可在预防性 ST-MCS 下使用改良的低成本 V-A ECMO 成功实施,适用于资源有限的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy and endoscopic gastrostomy in patients on extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. The emerging role of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation in totally endoscopic and robotic-assisted cardiac surgery procedures. Safety and feasibility of conversion from venoarterial to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric patients: A case series. Successful management of pulmonary hemorrhage from lung carcinoid, in a patient on VenoArterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Learning: A lifelong process of evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1