Saki Ito, Michal Cohen-Shelly, Zachi I Attia, Eunjung Lee, Paul A Friedman, Vuyisile T Nkomo, Hector I Michelena, Peter A Noseworthy, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Jae K Oh
{"title":"Correlation between artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram and echocardiographic features in aortic stenosis.","authors":"Saki Ito, Michal Cohen-Shelly, Zachi I Attia, Eunjung Lee, Paul A Friedman, Vuyisile T Nkomo, Hector I Michelena, Peter A Noseworthy, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Jae K Oh","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztad009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is a promising tool to detect patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before developing symptoms. However, functional, structural, or haemodynamic components reflected in AI-ECG responsible for its detection are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The AI-ECG model that was developed at Mayo Clinic using a convolutional neural network to identify patients with moderate-severe AS was applied. In patients used as the testing group, the correlation between the AI-ECG probability of AS and echocardiographic parameters was investigated. This study included 102 926 patients (63.0 ± 16.3 years, 52% male), and 28 464 (27.7%) were identified as AS positive by AI-ECG. Older age, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and heart failure were more common in the positive AI-ECG group than in the negative group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The AI-ECG was correlated with aortic valve area (ρ = -0.48, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.20), peak velocity (ρ = 0.22, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08), and mean pressure gradient (ρ = 0.35, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08). The AI-ECG also correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (ρ = 0.36, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.13), <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>' (ρ = 0.36, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12), and left atrium volume index (ρ = 0.42, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12). Neither LV ejection fraction nor stroke volume index had a significant correlation with the AI-ECG. Age correlated with the AI-ECG (ρ = 0.46, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.22) and its correlation with echocardiography parameters was similar to that of the AI-ECG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of AS severity, diastolic dysfunction, and LV hypertrophy is reflected in the AI-ECG to detect AS. There seems to be a gradation of the cardiac anatomical/functional features in the model and its identification process of AS is multifactorial.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"4 3","pages":"196-206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/07/ztad009.PMC10232245.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztad009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Aims: An artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is a promising tool to detect patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before developing symptoms. However, functional, structural, or haemodynamic components reflected in AI-ECG responsible for its detection are unknown.
Methods and results: The AI-ECG model that was developed at Mayo Clinic using a convolutional neural network to identify patients with moderate-severe AS was applied. In patients used as the testing group, the correlation between the AI-ECG probability of AS and echocardiographic parameters was investigated. This study included 102 926 patients (63.0 ± 16.3 years, 52% male), and 28 464 (27.7%) were identified as AS positive by AI-ECG. Older age, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and heart failure were more common in the positive AI-ECG group than in the negative group (P < 0.001). The AI-ECG was correlated with aortic valve area (ρ = -0.48, R2 = 0.20), peak velocity (ρ = 0.22, R2 = 0.08), and mean pressure gradient (ρ = 0.35, R2 = 0.08). The AI-ECG also correlated with left ventricular (LV) mass index (ρ = 0.36, R2 = 0.13), E/e' (ρ = 0.36, R2 = 0.12), and left atrium volume index (ρ = 0.42, R2 = 0.12). Neither LV ejection fraction nor stroke volume index had a significant correlation with the AI-ECG. Age correlated with the AI-ECG (ρ = 0.46, R2 = 0.22) and its correlation with echocardiography parameters was similar to that of the AI-ECG.
Conclusion: A combination of AS severity, diastolic dysfunction, and LV hypertrophy is reflected in the AI-ECG to detect AS. There seems to be a gradation of the cardiac anatomical/functional features in the model and its identification process of AS is multifactorial.