Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1057/s41287-023-00577-x
Marina Apgar, Mieke Snijder, Grace Lyn Higdon, Sylvia Szabo
{"title":"Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity.","authors":"Marina Apgar,&nbsp;Mieke Snijder,&nbsp;Grace Lyn Higdon,&nbsp;Sylvia Szabo","doi":"10.1057/s41287-023-00577-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world's poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to evaluation. The papers in this special issue present rich experiences of authors working across sectors and geographies, employing methodological innovation and navigating power as they reconcile tensions. They illustrate the challenges with (i) evaluating performance to meet accountability demands while fostering learning for adaptation; (ii) evaluating prospective theories of change while capturing emergent change; (iii) evaluating internal relational dimensions while measuring external development outcomes; (iv) evaluating across scales: from measuring local level end impact to understanding contributions to systems level change. Taken as a whole, the issue illustrates how the research for development evaluation field is maturing through the experiences of a growing and diverse group of researchers and evaluators as they shift from using narrow accountability instruments to appreciating emergent causal pathways within research for development.</p>","PeriodicalId":75001,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"35 2","pages":"241-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9976688/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-023-00577-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Large publicly funded programmes of research continue to receive increased investment as interventions aiming to produce impact for the world's poorest and most marginalized populations. At this intersection of research and development, research is expected to contribute to complex processes of societal change. Embracing a co-produced view of impact as emerging along uncertain causal pathways often without predefined outcomes calls for innovation in the use of complexity-aware approaches to evaluation. The papers in this special issue present rich experiences of authors working across sectors and geographies, employing methodological innovation and navigating power as they reconcile tensions. They illustrate the challenges with (i) evaluating performance to meet accountability demands while fostering learning for adaptation; (ii) evaluating prospective theories of change while capturing emergent change; (iii) evaluating internal relational dimensions while measuring external development outcomes; (iv) evaluating across scales: from measuring local level end impact to understanding contributions to systems level change. Taken as a whole, the issue illustrates how the research for development evaluation field is maturing through the experiences of a growing and diverse group of researchers and evaluators as they shift from using narrow accountability instruments to appreciating emergent causal pathways within research for development.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价研究促进发展:通过创新驾驭复杂性。
大型公共资助的研究方案继续得到更多的投资,作为干预措施,旨在对世界上最贫穷和最边缘化的人口产生影响。在这个研究与发展的交叉点上,研究有望为复杂的社会变革过程做出贡献。接受共同产生的影响观点,认为影响是沿着不确定的因果路径出现的,往往没有预先确定的结果,这要求在使用具有复杂性意识的评估方法方面进行创新。这期特刊中的论文展示了作者在跨部门和跨地域工作的丰富经验,他们在调和紧张关系时采用了方法创新和导航能力。它们说明了以下方面的挑战:(i)评估绩效以满足问责要求,同时促进适应学习;(ii)在捕捉紧急变化的同时,评估前瞻性的变化理论;(iii)在衡量外部发展成果的同时评估内部关系维度;(iv)跨尺度评估:从衡量地方层面的最终影响到理解对系统层面变化的贡献。作为一个整体,这个问题说明了发展研究评价领域是如何通过越来越多的不同的研究人员和评价人员的经验而趋于成熟的,因为他们从使用狭隘的问责制工具转向了解发展研究中出现的因果途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1