The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychosocial rehabilitation of forensic psychiatric patients in Austria

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101889
Marlene Koch , Alexander Dvorak , Melanie Hobersdorfer , Lusine Yeghiazaryan , Ulrich Rabl , Arkadiusz Komorowski
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychosocial rehabilitation of forensic psychiatric patients in Austria","authors":"Marlene Koch ,&nbsp;Alexander Dvorak ,&nbsp;Melanie Hobersdorfer ,&nbsp;Lusine Yeghiazaryan ,&nbsp;Ulrich Rabl ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Komorowski","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to increased psychological distress and far-reaching restrictions of freedom. In March 2020, Austrian penal authorities enacted various safety and protection measures to mitigate the propagation of COVID-19. While infection rates in penal institutions were low, restrictive conditions of detention limited the forensic care of offenders. This retrospective longitudinal observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the psychosocial rehabilitation in forensic psychiatry.</p><p>Administrative and clinical data obtained from 97 males treated at an inpatient forensic mental health institution were compared before (January 2019 – mid-March 2020) and after (mid-March 2020 – May 2021) the enactment of pandemic-related restrictive measures. The study outcomes related to rehabilitative activities, social contacts, psychopathological stability, and compliance with institutional regulations.</p><p>During the pandemic, a decrease in individual one-day temporary releases (64 vs. 3, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and one-day group excursions (103 vs. 10, p &lt; .001) was observed. Likewise, visits by relatives (1440 vs. 429, p &lt; .001) and legal guardians (286 vs. 130, <em>p</em> = .009) decreased. Regarding compliance with institutional regulations, illegal activities decreased from 27 to 8 after enactment of restrictive measures (<em>p</em> = .024). In contrast, long-term temporary releases (122 vs. 188 weeks, <em>p</em> = .131) and admissions to the acute ward (141 vs. 143, <em>p</em> = .712) remained unchanged. Overall, this study demonstrates the substantial impact of COVID-19 on the psychosocial care of forensic psychiatric patients and implies the necessity for guidelines to uphold an appropriate standard of forensic rehabilitation during future pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10110938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252723000328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to increased psychological distress and far-reaching restrictions of freedom. In March 2020, Austrian penal authorities enacted various safety and protection measures to mitigate the propagation of COVID-19. While infection rates in penal institutions were low, restrictive conditions of detention limited the forensic care of offenders. This retrospective longitudinal observational study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the psychosocial rehabilitation in forensic psychiatry.

Administrative and clinical data obtained from 97 males treated at an inpatient forensic mental health institution were compared before (January 2019 – mid-March 2020) and after (mid-March 2020 – May 2021) the enactment of pandemic-related restrictive measures. The study outcomes related to rehabilitative activities, social contacts, psychopathological stability, and compliance with institutional regulations.

During the pandemic, a decrease in individual one-day temporary releases (64 vs. 3, p < .001) and one-day group excursions (103 vs. 10, p < .001) was observed. Likewise, visits by relatives (1440 vs. 429, p < .001) and legal guardians (286 vs. 130, p = .009) decreased. Regarding compliance with institutional regulations, illegal activities decreased from 27 to 8 after enactment of restrictive measures (p = .024). In contrast, long-term temporary releases (122 vs. 188 weeks, p = .131) and admissions to the acute ward (141 vs. 143, p = .712) remained unchanged. Overall, this study demonstrates the substantial impact of COVID-19 on the psychosocial care of forensic psychiatric patients and implies the necessity for guidelines to uphold an appropriate standard of forensic rehabilitation during future pandemics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情对奥地利法医精神病患者心理社会康复的影响
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致心理困扰加剧,对自由的限制影响深远。2020年3月,奥地利刑事当局颁布了各种安全和保护措施,以减轻COVID-19的传播。虽然刑罚机构的感染率很低,但限制性的拘留条件限制了对罪犯的法医护理。本回顾性纵向观察研究旨在评估大流行对法医精神病学心理社会康复的影响。在实施与大流行相关的限制措施之前(2019年1月至2020年3月中旬)和之后(2020年3月中旬至2021年5月),对在法医精神卫生住院机构接受治疗的97名男性的行政和临床数据进行了比较。研究结果涉及康复活动、社会交往、精神病理稳定性和对机构规定的遵守情况。在大流行期间,个别单日临时释放减少(64对3,p <.001)和一天的团体旅行(103 vs. 10, p <.001)。同样,亲戚拜访(1440 vs. 429, p <.001)和法定监护人(286对130,p = .009)减少。在遵守体制规定方面,实施限制性措施后,非法活动从27项减少到8项(p = 0.024)。相比之下,长期临时释放(122周对188周,p = .131)和急性病房入院(141周对143周,p = .712)保持不变。总体而言,本研究表明COVID-19对法医精神病患者的心理社会护理产生了重大影响,并暗示有必要制定指南,在未来的大流行期间维持适当的法医康复标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Global prevalence of borderline personality disorder and self-reported symptoms of adults in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) and the criminal justice system: A guide for legal professionals Advance healthcare directives and advance choice documents in psychiatry: New resources, new legislation, new opportunities Policing psychiatric illness: An organisational paradox for Health & Law Antisocial personality disorder and determinants among prisoners in South Gondar zone correctional institutions, Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1