Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis Requiring Midodrine

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2023.100163
Ethan C. Korngold MD , Ruyun Jin MD , Kateri J. Spinelli PhD , Vishesh Kumar MD , Brydan Curtis DO , Sameer Gafoor MD , Derek Phan MD , Daniel Spoon MD , Aidan Raney MD , Lisa McCabe ARNP , Brandon Jones MD
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis Requiring Midodrine","authors":"Ethan C. Korngold MD ,&nbsp;Ruyun Jin MD ,&nbsp;Kateri J. Spinelli PhD ,&nbsp;Vishesh Kumar MD ,&nbsp;Brydan Curtis DO ,&nbsp;Sameer Gafoor MD ,&nbsp;Derek Phan MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Spoon MD ,&nbsp;Aidan Raney MD ,&nbsp;Lisa McCabe ARNP ,&nbsp;Brandon Jones MD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2023.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) taking midodrine may be at high risk for poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated dialysis-dependent ESRD patients taking midodrine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-clinical trial TAVR patients from February 2012 to December 2020 from 11 facilities in a Western US health system. Patient groups included ESRD patients on midodrine before TAVR (ESRD [+M]), ESRD patients without midodrine (ESRD [−M]), and non-ESRD patients. The endpoints of 30-day and 1-year mortality were represented by Kaplan–Meier survival estimator and compared by log-rank test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five ESRD (+M), 216 ESRD (−M), and 6898 non-ESRD patients were included. ESRD patients had more comorbid conditions, despite no significant difference in predicted Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk between ESRD (+M) and ESRD (−M) (8.7% vs. 9.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.491). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) patients vs. ESRD (−M) patients (20.1% vs. 5.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.001) and for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (2.5%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). One-year mortality trended higher for ESRD (+M) vs. ESRD (−M) patients (41.9% vs. 29.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.07), and was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (10.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Compared to ESRD (−M), ESRD (+M) patients had a higher incidence of 30-day stroke (6.7% vs. 1.4%, <em>p</em> = 0.033), 30-day vascular complications (6.7% vs. 0.9%, <em>p</em> = 0.011), and a lower rate of discharge to home (62.2% vs. 84.7%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, ESRD (−M) patients had no significant differences from non-ESRD patients for these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our experience suggests ESRD patients on midodrine are a higher acuity population with worse survival after TAVR, compared to ESRD patients not on midodrine. These findings may help with risk stratification for ESRD patients undergoing TAVR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) taking midodrine may be at high risk for poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated dialysis-dependent ESRD patients taking midodrine.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-clinical trial TAVR patients from February 2012 to December 2020 from 11 facilities in a Western US health system. Patient groups included ESRD patients on midodrine before TAVR (ESRD [+M]), ESRD patients without midodrine (ESRD [−M]), and non-ESRD patients. The endpoints of 30-day and 1-year mortality were represented by Kaplan–Meier survival estimator and compared by log-rank test.

Results

Forty-five ESRD (+M), 216 ESRD (−M), and 6898 non-ESRD patients were included. ESRD patients had more comorbid conditions, despite no significant difference in predicted Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk between ESRD (+M) and ESRD (−M) (8.7% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.491). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) patients vs. ESRD (−M) patients (20.1% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001) and for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (2.5%, p < 0.001). One-year mortality trended higher for ESRD (+M) vs. ESRD (−M) patients (41.9% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.07), and was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (10.7%, p < 0.001). Compared to ESRD (−M), ESRD (+M) patients had a higher incidence of 30-day stroke (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.033), 30-day vascular complications (6.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.011), and a lower rate of discharge to home (62.2% vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, ESRD (−M) patients had no significant differences from non-ESRD patients for these outcomes.

Conclusions

Our experience suggests ESRD patients on midodrine are a higher acuity population with worse survival after TAVR, compared to ESRD patients not on midodrine. These findings may help with risk stratification for ESRD patients undergoing TAVR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗需要米多定血液透析的终末期肾病患者的预后
背景透析依赖性终末期肾病(ESRD)患者服用米多林可能是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后不良结果的高危人群。我们评估了服用米多林的透析依赖性ESRD患者。方法我们对2012年2月至2020年12月来自美国西部卫生系统11个机构的非临床试验TAVR患者进行了回顾性分析。患者组包括TAVR前服用米多林的ESRD患者(ESRD[+M])、未服用米多琳的ESRD(ESRD[-M])和非ESRD患者。30天和1年死亡率的终点由Kaplan–Meier生存估计量表示,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。结果纳入45例ESRD(+M)、216例ESRD患者和6898例非ESRD患者。ESRD患者有更多的合并症,尽管ESRD(+M)和ESRD(−M)之间预测的胸科医生学会死亡率风险没有显著差异(8.7%vs.9.2%,p=0.491)。ESRD(−M)患者(20.1%对5.6%,p=0.001),ESRD(+M)与非ESRD患者(2.5%,p<;0.001)。ESRD(+M)与ESRD(–M)患者的一年死亡率趋势更高(41.9%对29.8%,p=0.07),ESRD(+M,ESRD(+M)患者的30天中风发生率较高(6.7%对1.4%,p=0.033),30天血管并发症发生率较高,出院率较低(62.2%对84.7%,p<0.001)。相反,ESRD(−M)患者与非ESRD患者在这些结果上没有显著差异。结论我们的经验表明,与未服用米多林的ESRD患者相比,服用米多丁的ESRD病人是TAVR后视力更高、生存率更差的人群。这些发现可能有助于对接受TAVR的ESRD患者进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
National Trends, In-Hospital Mortality, and Outcomes of Atrial Septal Defect/Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Procedure: An Analysis From the National Inpatient Sample In-Hospital Outcomes and 30-Day Readmission Rate After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Liver Cirrhosis: A Contemporary Propensity-Matched Analysis The Cost of Waiting for a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries With Severe Aortic Stenosis Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Clinical Trials: Incomplete Data and FDA-Approved Devices Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of Common Atrioventricular Valve Regurgitation in the Setting of a Lateral Tunnel Fontan Circulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1