Ethan C. Korngold MD , Ruyun Jin MD , Kateri J. Spinelli PhD , Vishesh Kumar MD , Brydan Curtis DO , Sameer Gafoor MD , Derek Phan MD , Daniel Spoon MD , Aidan Raney MD , Lisa McCabe ARNP , Brandon Jones MD
{"title":"Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis Requiring Midodrine","authors":"Ethan C. Korngold MD , Ruyun Jin MD , Kateri J. Spinelli PhD , Vishesh Kumar MD , Brydan Curtis DO , Sameer Gafoor MD , Derek Phan MD , Daniel Spoon MD , Aidan Raney MD , Lisa McCabe ARNP , Brandon Jones MD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2023.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) taking midodrine may be at high risk for poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated dialysis-dependent ESRD patients taking midodrine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-clinical trial TAVR patients from February 2012 to December 2020 from 11 facilities in a Western US health system. Patient groups included ESRD patients on midodrine before TAVR (ESRD [+M]), ESRD patients without midodrine (ESRD [−M]), and non-ESRD patients. The endpoints of 30-day and 1-year mortality were represented by Kaplan–Meier survival estimator and compared by log-rank test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five ESRD (+M), 216 ESRD (−M), and 6898 non-ESRD patients were included. ESRD patients had more comorbid conditions, despite no significant difference in predicted Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk between ESRD (+M) and ESRD (−M) (8.7% vs. 9.2%, <em>p</em> = 0.491). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) patients vs. ESRD (−M) patients (20.1% vs. 5.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.001) and for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (2.5%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). One-year mortality trended higher for ESRD (+M) vs. ESRD (−M) patients (41.9% vs. 29.8%, <em>p</em> = 0.07), and was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (10.7%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Compared to ESRD (−M), ESRD (+M) patients had a higher incidence of 30-day stroke (6.7% vs. 1.4%, <em>p</em> = 0.033), 30-day vascular complications (6.7% vs. 0.9%, <em>p</em> = 0.011), and a lower rate of discharge to home (62.2% vs. 84.7%, <em>p</em> < 0.001). In contrast, ESRD (−M) patients had no significant differences from non-ESRD patients for these outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our experience suggests ESRD patients on midodrine are a higher acuity population with worse survival after TAVR, compared to ESRD patients not on midodrine. These findings may help with risk stratification for ESRD patients undergoing TAVR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) taking midodrine may be at high risk for poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated dialysis-dependent ESRD patients taking midodrine.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-clinical trial TAVR patients from February 2012 to December 2020 from 11 facilities in a Western US health system. Patient groups included ESRD patients on midodrine before TAVR (ESRD [+M]), ESRD patients without midodrine (ESRD [−M]), and non-ESRD patients. The endpoints of 30-day and 1-year mortality were represented by Kaplan–Meier survival estimator and compared by log-rank test.
Results
Forty-five ESRD (+M), 216 ESRD (−M), and 6898 non-ESRD patients were included. ESRD patients had more comorbid conditions, despite no significant difference in predicted Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk between ESRD (+M) and ESRD (−M) (8.7% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.491). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) patients vs. ESRD (−M) patients (20.1% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001) and for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (2.5%, p < 0.001). One-year mortality trended higher for ESRD (+M) vs. ESRD (−M) patients (41.9% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.07), and was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (10.7%, p < 0.001). Compared to ESRD (−M), ESRD (+M) patients had a higher incidence of 30-day stroke (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.033), 30-day vascular complications (6.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.011), and a lower rate of discharge to home (62.2% vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, ESRD (−M) patients had no significant differences from non-ESRD patients for these outcomes.
Conclusions
Our experience suggests ESRD patients on midodrine are a higher acuity population with worse survival after TAVR, compared to ESRD patients not on midodrine. These findings may help with risk stratification for ESRD patients undergoing TAVR.