Safety Signal between Azacitidine and Pericarditis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000526610
Brandon Chu, Ajit Venkatakrishnan, Pushkar Aggarwal
{"title":"Safety Signal between Azacitidine and Pericarditis.","authors":"Brandon Chu,&nbsp;Ajit Venkatakrishnan,&nbsp;Pushkar Aggarwal","doi":"10.1159/000526610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced pericarditis is an important cause of pericarditis and if unnoticed and unmanaged can lead to constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this analysis was to determine if a significant signal exists between azacitidine use and pericarditis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using the FDA Adverse Event Database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 reports of azacitidine-induced pericarditis with azacitidine as the suspect drug were identified. The most common indications for azacitidine use in the adverse event reports were myelodysplastic syndrome (48%) and acute myelogenous leukemia (27%). Physicians reported 44% of the azacitidine-induced pericarditis reports, while other health professional reported 52% of the reports. The disproportionality analysis showed a proportional reporting ratio of 5.0, χ2 of 149.8, reporting odds ratio of 5.0, and IC025 of 1.8. Literature review found 3 case reports of azacitidine-induced pericarditis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The signal between azacitidine and pericarditis was found to be statistically significant. Clinicians should be aware of the possible risk of pericarditis when prescribing azacitidine. If there is suspicion for azacitidine-induced pericarditis, clinicians should consider discontinuation of azacitidine to improve patient's symptoms and reduce the likelihood of the development of constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced pericarditis is an important cause of pericarditis and if unnoticed and unmanaged can lead to constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade.

Objective: The objective of this analysis was to determine if a significant signal exists between azacitidine use and pericarditis.

Methods: A pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using the FDA Adverse Event Database.

Results: 48 reports of azacitidine-induced pericarditis with azacitidine as the suspect drug were identified. The most common indications for azacitidine use in the adverse event reports were myelodysplastic syndrome (48%) and acute myelogenous leukemia (27%). Physicians reported 44% of the azacitidine-induced pericarditis reports, while other health professional reported 52% of the reports. The disproportionality analysis showed a proportional reporting ratio of 5.0, χ2 of 149.8, reporting odds ratio of 5.0, and IC025 of 1.8. Literature review found 3 case reports of azacitidine-induced pericarditis.

Conclusion: The signal between azacitidine and pericarditis was found to be statistically significant. Clinicians should be aware of the possible risk of pericarditis when prescribing azacitidine. If there is suspicion for azacitidine-induced pericarditis, clinicians should consider discontinuation of azacitidine to improve patient's symptoms and reduce the likelihood of the development of constrictive pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿扎胞苷与心包炎之间的安全信号。
背景:药物性心包炎是心包炎的一个重要原因,如果不加以注意和处理,可导致缩窄性心包炎、心包积液和心包填塞。目的:本分析的目的是确定阿扎胞苷使用和心包炎之间是否存在显著的信号。方法:使用FDA不良事件数据库进行药物警戒分析。结果:共发现48例阿扎胞苷致心包炎,疑似用药为阿扎胞苷。在不良事件报告中,阿扎胞苷最常见的适应症是骨髓增生异常综合征(48%)和急性髓性白血病(27%)。阿扎胞苷引起的心包炎报告中,医生报告了44%,而其他卫生专业人员报告了52%。歧化分析显示,比例报告比为5.0,χ2为149.8,报告优势比为5.0,IC025为1.8。文献复习发现阿扎胞苷致心包炎3例报告。结论:阿扎胞苷与心包炎的信号有统计学意义。临床医生在开阿扎胞苷处方时应注意可能的心包炎风险。如果怀疑阿扎胞苷引起心包炎,临床医生应考虑停用阿扎胞苷,以改善患者的症状,减少发生缩窄性心包炎、心包积液和心包填塞的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1